IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v15y2025i6p200-d1663870.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Family vs. Non-Family CEOs on Product Innovation in Turkish Family Businesses

Author

Listed:
  • Saltuk Karayalcin

    (Kurtsan Ilaclari A.S., Merkez, Ofispark, Baglar Cd. No:14C Ic Kapi No:4, Kagithane, Istanbul 34406, Türkiye)

Abstract

Family businesses are a significant part of the global economy, yet defining them and understanding their features remains a topic of debate. Despite the suggestion that family ownership may lead to conservative innovation strategies, recent research indicates that family businesses can embrace strategic risk in innovation. Governance of innovation in family firms is a growing area of interest, with corporate governance influencing R&D and innovation decisions. The role of CEOs in family businesses is critical for innovation strategies, with family CEOs often prioritizing long-term interests. However, research on innovation in Turkish family businesses is lacking, offering an open area for exploration. This article investigates the influence of CEO type (family vs. non-family) on product innovation, innovation management processes, strategic decision-making, risk-taking behaviors, technology adoption, and emotional attachment within Turkish family businesses. A survey methodology was employed, reaching out to Turkish family businesses with a CEO involved in product innovation. The study found that, while family CEOs exhibit a stronger emotional attachment compared to non-family CEOs, there was no significant difference in the perceived influence of CEOs on product innovation. Non-family CEOs were not significantly more likely to implement formal innovation management processes or prioritize long-term strategic goals over short-term profits. Similarly, there was no significant evidence supporting the notion that non-family CEOs are more likely to engage in risk-taking behaviors compared to family CEOs. The study suggests a need for further research using a larger sample and diverse methodologies to deepen understanding of family business dynamics, particularly in the context of innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Saltuk Karayalcin, 2025. "The Effect of Family vs. Non-Family CEOs on Product Innovation in Turkish Family Businesses," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-29, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:6:p:200-:d:1663870
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/6/200/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/6/200/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David J. TEECE, 2008. "Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: The Transfer And Licensing Of Know-How And Intellectual Property Understanding the Multinational Enterprise in the Modern World, chapter 5, pages 67-87, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Juliana R. Baltazar & Cristina I. Fernandes & Veland Ramadani & Mathew Hughes, 2023. "Family business succession and innovation: a systematic literature review," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(8), pages 2897-2920, November.
    3. Esra Memili, 2015. "Performance and Behavior of Family Firms," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-8, September.
    4. Anna Maria Bornhausen & Torsten Wulf, 2024. "Digital innovation in family firms: The roles of non-family managers and transgenerational control intentions," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 1429-1448, April.
    5. Qiuqin He & Carlos Lassala & Rosa Currás-Móstoles, 2024. "Can family CEOs promote enterprises’ digital transformation? An analysis based on ability-willingness paradox," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 3181-3205, December.
    6. Carlos Benavides-Velasco & Cristina Quintana-García & Vanesa Guzmán-Parra, 2013. "Trends in family business research," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 41-57, January.
    7. Dmitry Khanin & Atanu Rakshit & Raj V. Mahto & William C. McDowell, 2020. "An Ongoing race: family CEOs vs. non-family CEOs," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1043-1063, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sabela Siaba & Berta Rivera, 2024. "The evolution of the field of family business research over a decade (2012–2022)," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 1089-1115, October.
    2. S. Arunachalam & Sridhar N. Ramaswami & Pol Herrmann & Doug Walker, 2018. "Innovation pathway to profitability: the role of entrepreneurial orientation and marketing capabilities," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 744-766, July.
    3. Krickx, Guido A., 1995. "Vertical integration in the computer mainframe industry: A transaction cost interpretation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 75-91, January.
    4. Soufiane Mezzourh & Walid A Nakara, 2009. "Governance and innovation : A Knowledge-based approach [La gouvernance de l'innovation : une approche par la connaissance]," Post-Print halshs-01955966, HAL.
    5. Hua Tang, 2022. "The Effect of ESG Performance on Corporate Innovation in China: The Mediating Role of Financial Constraints and Agency Cost," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    6. Morricone, Serena & Munari, Federico & Oriani, Raffaele & de Rassenfosse, Gaetan, 2017. "Commercialization Strategy and IPO Underpricing," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 1133-1141.
    7. Kuosmanen, Natalia & Valmari, Nelli, 2023. "Renewal of Companies Through Product Switching," ETLA Working Papers 104, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    8. Tarifa Fernández, Jorge & de Burgos Jiménez, Jerónimo & Céspedes Lorente, José Joaquín, 2018. "Absorptive capacity as a confounder of the process of supply chain integration," MPRA Paper 120125, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2018.
    9. Laura Barbieri & Daniela Bragoli & Flavia Cortelezzi & Giovanni Marseguerra, 2015. "Public Support to Innovation Strategies," DISCE - Quaderni del Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali dises1509, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE).
    10. Baldwin, Carliss Y. & Bogers, Marcel L.A.M. & Kapoor, Rahul & West, Joel, 2024. "Focusing the ecosystem lens on innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    11. Massimo Colombo & Annalisa Croce & Samuele Murtinu, 2014. "Ownership structure, horizontal agency costs and the performance of high-tech entrepreneurial firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 265-282, February.
    12. Ariño, Africa & García-Canal, Esteban & Valdes, Ana, 1999. "Longevity of strategic alliances between competitors: A dynamic value creation approach," IESE Research Papers D/404, IESE Business School.
    13. Zemsky, Peter & Adner, Ron, 2003. "Disruptive Technologies and the Emergence of Competition," CEPR Discussion Papers 3994, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    14. Frida Thomas Pacho, 2018. "Diversified Network Effects on Innovation Performance in Tanzania: Innovation Strategy in Service Firms," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business Innovation, Macrothink Institute, Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business Innovation, vol. 5(1), pages 1-1, December.
    15. Dwibedy, Punyashlok, 2022. "Informal competition and product innovation decisions of new ventures and incumbents across developing and transitioning countries," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 17(C).
    16. Richard Harris & John Moffat, 2011. "R&D, Innovation and Exporting," SERC Discussion Papers 0073, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    17. Iain M. Cockburn & Megan J. MacGarvie, 2011. "Entry and Patenting in the Software Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(5), pages 915-933, May.
    18. Markus Solf, 2004. "Unternehmenskooperationen als Folge von Informations- und Kommunikations-technologieveränderungen: Eine theoretische Analyse," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 146-167, March.
    19. Annika Rickne, 2006. "Connectivity and Performance of Science-based Firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 393-407, May.
    20. Holger Patzelt & Dean A. Shepherd, 2009. "Strategic Entrepreneurship at Universities: Academic Entrepreneurs’ Assessment of Policy Programs," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 33(1), pages 319-340, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:6:p:200-:d:1663870. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.