IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v13y2023i12p248-d1291513.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Agile Values in Enhancing Good Governance in Public Administration during the COVID-19 Crisis: An International Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Nina Tomaževič

    (Faculty of Public Administration, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Polonca Kovač

    (Faculty of Public Administration, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Dejan Ravšelj

    (Faculty of Public Administration, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Lan Umek

    (Faculty of Public Administration, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Cenay Babaoğlu

    (Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University, 51240 Niğde, Türkiye)

  • Marie Bohatá

    (Business Economics Department, University of Economics and Management, 15000 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Bernhard Hirsch

    (Bundeswehr University Munich, 85577 Neubiberg, Germany)

  • Onur Kulaç

    (Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Pamukkale University, 20160 Denizli, Türkiye)

  • Guliya K. Nurlybaeva

    (Institute for Social Sciences, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, 119571 Moscow, Russia)

  • Fabienne-Sophie Schäfer

    (Bundeswehr University Munich, 85577 Neubiberg, Germany)

  • Aleksander Aristovnik

    (Faculty of Public Administration, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

Abstract

This study aimed to analyse the impact of digitalisation on good governance with respect to selected local public administrations during the COVID-19 lockdown in the spring of 2020. The overriding assumption made is that agile values mediate the relationship between digitalisation and good governance on this level of public administration. Data were obtained through a web-based survey conducted between June and August 2020. The empirical analysis was facilitated by applying partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) on a sample of 761 public managers from five Central European countries (Czech Republic, Germany, Poland, Romania, Slovenia). The results show that digitalisation acted as an essential driver of good governance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Three out of four agile values—“employees and internal relationships”, “working public services”, and “change management”—were also shown to help make digitalisation more effective and thereby facilitate good governance. Despite some limitations (e.g., respondents’ subjective evaluations, the study only being performed during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in the observed countries with different situations and consequent measures in response, and differences in the broader environment and local administration systems in the studied countries), the findings of the study are important given the lack of similar empirical studies. Public administrations should be digitalised and reformed in a way that ensures that they effectively and efficiently design, implement, measure, and continuously improve their strategies, tactics, and services, which can all be accomplished by being agile. The paper offers insights into: (1) the lessons learnt about the nature of digitalised public services/processes and agile management approaches in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and their impact on good governance; and (2) proposals for policymakers and managers in public administrations with regard to operating in extreme VUCA circumstances in any next wave of COVID-19 pandemic or in a new pandemic/public health disaster.

Suggested Citation

  • Nina Tomaževič & Polonca Kovač & Dejan Ravšelj & Lan Umek & Cenay Babaoğlu & Marie Bohatá & Bernhard Hirsch & Onur Kulaç & Guliya K. Nurlybaeva & Fabienne-Sophie Schäfer & Aleksander Aristovnik, 2023. "The Role of Agile Values in Enhancing Good Governance in Public Administration during the COVID-19 Crisis: An International Survey," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:13:y:2023:i:12:p:248-:d:1291513
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/13/12/248/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/13/12/248/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mariana Mazzucato, 2018. "Mission-oriented innovation policies: challenges and opportunities," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(5), pages 803-815.
    2. Wolfgang Drechsler & Rainer Kattel, 2020. "Debate: The developed civil servant—providing agility and stability at the same time," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(8), pages 549-551, November.
    3. Stephen Osborne & Taco Brandsen & Valentina Mele & Juraj Nemec & Marieke van Genugten & Sophie Flemig, 2020. "Risking innovation. Understanding risk and public service innovation—evidence from a four nation study," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(1), pages 52-62, January.
    4. Mariana Mazzucato & Rainer Kattel, 2020. "COVID-19 and public-sector capacity," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 36(Supplemen), pages 256-269.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shufang Huang & Jin Chen & Liang Mei & Weiqiao Mo, 2019. "The Effect of Heterogeneity and Leadership on Innovation Performance: Evidence from University Research Teams in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Spaniol, Matthew J. & Rowland, Nicholas J., 2022. "Business ecosystems and the view from the future: The use of corporate foresight by stakeholders of the Ro-Ro shipping ecosystem in the Baltic Sea Region," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    3. Ralf Martin & Sam Unsworth & Anna Valero & Dennis Verhoeven, 2020. "Innovation for a strong and sustainable recovery," CEP Covid-19 Analyses cepcovid-19-014, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    4. Roth, Florian & Warnke, Philine & Niessen, Pia & Edler, Jakob, 2021. "Insights into systemic resilience from innovation research," Perspectives – Policy Briefs 03 / 2021, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    5. Magnus Henrekson & Anders Kärnä & Tino Sanandaji, 2022. "Schumpeterian entrepreneurship: coveted by policymakers but impervious to top-down policymaking," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 867-890, July.
    6. Janssen, Matthijs J. & Abbasiharofteh, Milad, 2022. "Boundary spanning R&D collaboration: Key enabling technologies and missions as alleviators of proximity effects?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    7. Ademuyiwa A. Lawal, 2021. "A Comparative Analysis of Innovative Automobile Policy on Employment in Nigeria and China," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(09), pages 679-686, September.
    8. Alje van Dam & Koen Frenken, 2020. "Vertical vs. Horizontal Policy in a Capabilities Model of Economic Development," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2037, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Aug 2020.
    9. Allen, Darcy W.E. & Berg, Chris & Markey-Towler, Brendan & Novak, Mikayla & Potts, Jason, 2020. "Blockchain and the evolution of institutional technologies: Implications for innovation policy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    10. Balkrishna C. Rao & Ingo Liefner, 2023. "Frugal Engineering of Advanced Frugal Innovations for Global Sustainability Entrepreneurship," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 32(2_suppl), pages 69-88, November.
    11. Odeh Al-Jayyousi & Hira Amin & Hiba Ali Al-Saudi & Amjaad Aljassas & Evren Tok, 2023. "Mission-Oriented Innovation Policy for Sustainable Development: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-21, August.
    12. Caravella, Serenella & Crespi, Francesco & Cucignatto, Giacomo & Guarascio, Dario, 2023. "Technological Sovereignty and Strategic Dependencies: The case of the Photovoltaic Supply Chain," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1330, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    13. Suarsana, Laura & Schneider, Tina & Warsewa, Günter, 2023. "Do regional innovation strategies meet societal challenges? A comparative analysis across regions in Belgium, Germany, Netherlands and Finland," Schriftenreihe Institut Arbeit und Wirtschaft 40/2023, Institut Arbeit und Wirtschaft (IAW), Universität Bremen und Arbeitnehmerkammer Bremen.
    14. Anne Rainville, 2022. "Green Public Procurement in Mission-Orientated Innovation Systems: Leveraging Voluntary Standards to Improve Sustainability Performance of Municipalities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    15. Gasperin, Simone, 2022. "Lessons from the past for 21st century systems of state-owned enterprises: The case of Italy's IRI in the 1930s," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 599-612.
    16. Nomaler, Önder & Spinola, Danilo & Verspagen, Bart, 2021. "Demand-led industrialisation policy in a dual-sector small balance of payments constrained economy," MERIT Working Papers 2021-038, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    17. Llopis, Oscar & D'Este, Pablo & McKelvey, Maureen & Yegros, Alfredo, 2022. "Navigating multiple logics: Legitimacy and the quest for societal impact in science," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    18. Coveri, Andrea & Cozza, Claudio & Guarascio, Dario, 2023. "Blurring boundaries: an analysis of the digital platforms-military nexus," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1364, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    19. Malte Jütting, 2020. "Exploring Mission-Oriented Innovation Ecosystems for Sustainability: Towards a Literature-Based Typology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-28, August.
    20. Pierre Azoulay & Danielle Li, 2020. "Scientific Grant Funding," NBER Working Papers 26889, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:13:y:2023:i:12:p:248-:d:1291513. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.