IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v12y2022i1p29-d748658.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Antecedents of Transparency of Italian Public Entities: An Empirical Analysis in Universities and Public Research Institutes

Author

Listed:
  • Angela Rella

    (Department of Management, Finance and Technology, LUM University, 70010 Bari, Italy)

  • Arcangelo Marrone

    (Department of Management, Finance and Technology, LUM University, 70010 Bari, Italy)

  • Nicola Raimo

    (Department of Management, Finance and Technology, LUM University, 70010 Bari, Italy)

  • Filippo Vitolla

    (Department of Management, Finance and Technology, LUM University, 70010 Bari, Italy)

Abstract

Transparency within universities and public research institutes is an element of significant relevance in the Italian context. Over the years, the need for greater transparency has prompted the legislator to regulate transparency obligations in order to ensure a minimum level of information disclosure. Despite the normative obligation, Italian universities and public research institutes provide different levels of information. This circumstance requires an empirical analysis aimed at understanding the different levels of transparency of Italian universities and public research institutes, and the factors that can influence the amount of information disclosed. The results show a positive impact of the size and the internationalization on the level of the transparency of these institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Angela Rella & Arcangelo Marrone & Nicola Raimo & Filippo Vitolla, 2022. "The Antecedents of Transparency of Italian Public Entities: An Empirical Analysis in Universities and Public Research Institutes," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:29-:d:748658
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/12/1/29/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/12/1/29/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roman Lanis & Grant Richardson, 2013. "Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: a test of legitimacy theory," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(1), pages 75-100, January.
    2. Blake E. Ashforth & Barrie W. Gibbs, 1990. "The Double-Edge of Organizational Legitimation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(2), pages 177-194, May.
    3. Natalia Aversano & Ferdinando Di Carlo & Giuseppe Sannino & Paolo Tartaglia Polcini & Rosa Lombardi, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility, stakeholder engagement, and universities: New evidence from the Italian scenario," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1892-1899, July.
    4. Patten, Dennis M., 2002. "The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: a research note," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(8), pages 763-773, November.
    5. Mehmoona Sharif & Kashif Rashid, 2014. "Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting: an empirical evidence from commercial banks (CB) of Pakistan," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 2501-2521, September.
    6. Robert A. Opoku & Magnus Hultman & Esmail Saheli-Sangari, 2008. "Positioning in Market Space: The Evaluation of Swedish Universities' Online Brand Personalities," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 124-144, February.
    7. Paolo RICCI, 2013. "What Future for Social Reporting and Accountability in Academic Systems. An Overview of the Italian Case," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(2), pages 202-221, May.
    8. Raimo, Nicola & Zito, Marianna & Caragnano, Alessandra, 2019. "Does national culture affect integrated reporting quality? A focus on GLOBE dimensions," EconStor Conference Papers 199012, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vitiana L'Abate & Filippo Vitolla & Paolo Esposito & Nicola Raimo, 2023. "The drivers of sustainability disclosure practices in the airport industry: A legitimacy theory perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 1903-1916, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vitiana L'Abate & Filippo Vitolla & Paolo Esposito & Nicola Raimo, 2023. "The drivers of sustainability disclosure practices in the airport industry: A legitimacy theory perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 1903-1916, July.
    2. Arcangelo Marrone & Lara Oliva, 2021. "Is ESG Disclosure a Means to Respond to Catastrophic Events? A Case Study Analysis," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(11), pages 1-53, July.
    3. Tiffany Cheng-Han Leung & Robin Stanley Snell, 2021. "Strategies for Social and Environmental Disclosure: The Case of Multinational Gambling Companies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(3), pages 447-467, January.
    4. Zeeshan Mahmood & Rehana Kouser & Md. Abdul Kaium Masud, 2019. "An emerging economy perspective on corporate sustainability reporting – main actors’ views on the current state of affairs in Pakistan," Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-31, December.
    5. Francesco Rosati & Lourenço Galvão Diniz Faria, 2019. "Business contribution to the Sustainable Development Agenda: Organizational factors related to early adoption of SDG reporting," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 588-597, May.
    6. Yinglin Huang & Claude Francoeur & Stephen Brammer, 2022. "What drives and curbs brownwashing?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2518-2532, July.
    7. Habib Zaman Khan & Muhammad Nurul Houqe & Ielemia K Ielemia, 2023. "Organic versus cosmetic efforts of the quality of carbon reporting by top New Zealand firms. Does market reward or penalise?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 686-703, January.
    8. Angelo Rosa & Angela Rella & Filippo Vitolla & Nicola Raimo, 2022. "Le determinanti della trasparenza informativa nella sanità pubblica. Un?analisi empirica nelle strutture ospedaliere i," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(122), pages 29-43.
    9. Siddique, Md Abubakar & Akhtaruzzaman, Md & Rashid, Afzalur & Hammami, Helmi, 2021. "Carbon disclosure, carbon performance and financial performance: International evidence," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    10. Michelon, Giovanna & Pilonato, Silvia & Ricceri, Federica, 2015. "CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 59-78.
    11. Hummel, Katrin & Schlick, Christian, 2013. "Zusammenhang zwischen Nachhaltigkeitsperformance und Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung – Legitimität oder finanzielle Überlegungen?," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 67(1), pages 36-61.
    12. Renata Blanc & Manuel Castelo Branco & Charles H. Cho & Joanne Sopt, 2013. "In Search Of Disclosure Effects Of The Siemens Ag’S Corruption Scandal," OBEGEF Working Papers 015, OBEGEF - Observatório de Economia e Gestão de Fraude;OBEGEF Working Papers on Fraud and Corruption.
    13. Raimo, Nicola & Zito, Marianna & Caragnano, Alessandra, 2020. "Firm Characteristics and Corporate Governance Disclosure in Integrated Reports," EconStor Conference Papers 224760, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    14. Aerts, Walter & Cormier, Denis, 2009. "Media legitimacy and corporate environmental communication," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 1-27, January.
    15. Alessandra Allini & Adele Caldarelli & Rosanna Span? & Annamaria Zampella, 2019. "Legitimating efforts in Performance Plans. Evidences on the thoroughness of disclosure in the Italian Higher Education setting," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2019(1), pages 143-168.
    16. Akbas Halil Emre, 2016. "The Relationship Between Board Characteristics and Environmental Disclosure: Evidence from Turkish Listed Companies," South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 11(2), pages 7-19, December.
    17. Arcangelo Marrone & Lara Oliva, 2021. "The Level of Integrated Reporting Alignment with the IIRC Framework: Evidence from South Africa," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(1), pages 1-99, July.
    18. Carsten Albers & Thomas Günther, 2010. "Disclose or not disclose: determinants of social reporting for STOXX Europe 600 firms," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 323-347, November.
    19. Isabel-María García-Sánchez & Nicola Raimo & Filippo Vitolla, 2021. "Are Environmentally Innovative Companies Inclined towards Integrated Environmental Disclosure Policies?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, March.
    20. Jennifer C. Chen & Dennis M. Patten & Robin Roberts, 2008. "Corporate Charitable Contributions: A Corporate Social Performance or Legitimacy Strategy?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 82(1), pages 131-144, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:29-:d:748658. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.