IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v10y2020i4p99-d454847.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Review of Selected Performance Measurement Models Used in Public Administration

Author

Listed:
  • Alicja Gębczyńska

    (Institute of Logistics, WSB University in Wroclaw, 53-609 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Renata Brajer-Marczak

    (Department of Economic and Organisation of Enterprises, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, 53-345 Wroclaw, Poland)

Abstract

The main goal of this article is to define the characteristics of and to evaluate the three selected models used to measure the performance of public administration bodies, with an emphasis placed on their application in different perspectives. The contemporary public administration institutions are obligated to increase their operating efficiency as well as the satisfaction of their stakeholders. This is precisely why they have been implementing diverse models, especially those already used for years in managing profit-oriented organisations. The models chosen for analysis are applied in public administration, making it possible to measure numerous indicators of both financial and nonfinancial nature. The research method adopted by the authors is a conceptual literature review performed using the resources of the Scopus, Springer, WoS, Emerald, and EBSCO databases. The items subject to analysis were the 3Es (i.e., economy, efficiency, effectiveness) and IOO (e.g., input, output, and outcome) models as well as the model included in the BSC (Balance Scorecard). The research has evidenced that each of the models has its strengths and limitations. The results thus obtained have led to a conclusion that the solution showing the highest potential in the area of the study is the performance measurement model proposed under the BSC; however, according to the authors, it still requires some fine-tuning to public administration’s operating conditions and organisational culture. The article also highlights the fundamental operationalisation problems related to the subject in question.

Suggested Citation

  • Alicja Gębczyńska & Renata Brajer-Marczak, 2020. "Review of Selected Performance Measurement Models Used in Public Administration," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:10:y:2020:i:4:p:99-:d:454847
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/10/4/99/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/10/4/99/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Myung Jin, 2013. "Public Service Motivation: A Cross-Country Study," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(5), pages 331-343.
    2. George A. Boyne, 2002. "Theme: Local Government: Concepts and Indicators of Local Authority Performance: An Evaluation of the Statutory Frameworks in England and Wales," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 17-24, April.
    3. William Dunn & David Miller, 2007. "A Critique of the New Public Management and the Neo-Weberian State: Advancing a Critical Theory of Administrative Reform," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 345-358, December.
    4. Max Moullin, 2017. "Improving and evaluating performance with the Public Sector Scorecard," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 66(4), pages 442-458, April.
    5. Benjamin Dreveton, 2013. "The advantages of the balanced scorecard in the public sector: beyond performance measurement," Post-Print hal-02071259, HAL.
    6. Marino, Calogero, 2010. "The Introduction of new Public Management Principles in the Italian Public Sector," Apas Papers 227, Academic Public Administration Studies Archive - APAS.
    7. Alberto Sardi & Enrico Sorano, 2019. "Dynamic Performance Management: An Approach for Managing the Common Goods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-22, November.
    8. Jingfeng Yuan & Alex Yajun Zeng & Miroslaw Skibniewski & Qiming Li, 2009. "Selection of performance objectives and key performance indicators in public-private partnership projects to achieve value for money," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 253-270.
    9. Jean Hartley & Clive Fletcher, 2008. "Leading with Political Awareness: Leadership Across Diverse Interests Inside and Outside the Organisation," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Kim Turnbull James & James Collins (ed.), Leadership Perspectives, chapter 12, pages 163-176, Palgrave Macmillan.
    10. Hoque, Zahirul, 2014. "20 years of studies on the balanced scorecard: Trends, accomplishments, gaps and opportunities for future research," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 33-59.
    11. Benjamin Dreveton, 2013. "The advantages of the balanced scorecard in the public sector: beyond performance measurement," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(2), pages 131-136, March.
    12. Jose A. Puppim De Oliveira & Yijia Jing & Paul Collins & Jie Gao, 2015. "Performance Measurement and Management in the Public Sector: Some Lessons from Research Evidence," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 35(2), pages 86-96, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schorn, Michael & Kaesmayr, Julia & Steidle, Anna, 2023. "Measuring Good Administration," OSF Preprints 9dt5c, Center for Open Science.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laura Espinasse & Bastien Viollet Viollet, 2022. "French Rugby Put To The Test Of Management Instrumentation: A Cross-Section Of The Federation And A Professional Sports Club [Le Rugby Français À L'Épreuve De L'Instrumentation De Gestion : Regards," Post-Print hal-03584048, HAL.
    2. Małgorzata Zajdel & Małgorzata Michalcewicz-Kaniowska & Paweł Modrzyński & Anna Komarnicka & Joanna Modrzyńska, 2021. "Conditions and Determinants of Distance Education for Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic—Evaluation in the Kuyavia-Pomerania Region in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-26, September.
    3. Pawel Modrzynski & Malgorzata Zajdel & Malgorzata Michalcewicz-Kaniowska, 2020. "Conditions and Potential for Remote Student Teaching," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 848-866.
    4. Cristiano CODAGNONE & Giovanni LIVA & Egidijus BARCEVICIUS & Gianluca MISURACA & Luka KLIMAVICIUTE & Michele BENEDETTI & Irene VANINI & Giancarlo VECCHI & Emily RYEN GLOINSON & Katherine STEWART & Sti, 2020. "Assessing the impacts of digital government transformation in the EU: Conceptual framework and empirical case studies," JRC Research Reports JRC120865, Joint Research Centre.
    5. Carolyn‐Dung Thi Thanh Tran & Brian Dollery, 2021. "All in the Mind: Citizen Satisfaction and Financial Performance in the Victorian Local Government System," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 31(1), pages 51-64, March.
    6. Nicolai PETROVSKY, 2011. "Measuring The Performance Of Federal Agencies And Programs In The Usa: An Overview And Some Reflections," Proceedings of Administration and Public Management International Conference, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 7(1), pages 17-26, June.
    7. Tóth, Balázs, 2021. "Milyen kapcsolatban állnak a közszféra reformjai a gazdaságpolitikai paradigmákkal? [How reforms of the public sector relate to the paradigms of economic policy]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 205-222.
    8. Cipolletta, Germano & Fiorani, Gloria & Matei, Ani & Matei, Lucica & Meneguzzo, Marco & Mititelu, Cristina, 2010. "Public Sector Modernization Trends of the Member States of European Union.Trajectories of reforms in Italy and Romania," Apas Papers 267, Academic Public Administration Studies Archive - APAS.
    9. Sari Suomalainen & Outi Tahvonen & Helena Kahiluoto, 2022. "From Participation to Involvement in Urban Open Space Management and Maintenance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, October.
    10. , Aisdl, 2020. "Employing Value Chain Theory To Address COVID-19 Outbreak In Tourism Management: A Resilience and Stakeholder View," OSF Preprints tmzvf, Center for Open Science.
    11. Tawse, Alex & Tabesh, Pooya, 2023. "Thirty years with the balanced scorecard: What we have learned," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 123-132.
    12. Stewart Kaupa & Sulaiman Olusegun Atiku, 2020. "Challenges in the Implementation of Performance Management System in Namibian Public Sector," International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 6(2), pages 25-34, June.
    13. Patrizia Di Tullio & Matteo La Torre & Diego Valentinetti & Michele A. Rea, 2021. "Toward performance measurement systems based on business models," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2021(suppl. 1), pages 97-122.
    14. repec:rom:campco:v:7:y:2011:i:1:p:17-26 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Chrisovalantis Malesios & Prasanta K. Dey & Fuad Ben Abdelaziz, 2020. "Supply chain sustainability performance measurement of small and medium sized enterprises using structural equation modeling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 294(1), pages 623-653, November.
    16. Namık Kemal Erdoğan & Ahmet Onay & Çağlar Karamaşa, 2019. "Measuring the Performance of Retailer Firms Listed in BIST under the Balanced Scorecard Perspective by Using Interval Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy AHP Based Pythagorean Fuzzy TODIM Methodology," Alphanumeric Journal, Bahadir Fatih Yildirim, vol. 7(2), pages 333-350, December.
    17. Henry J Liu & Peter ED Love & Jim Smith & Michael CP Sing & Jane Matthews, 2018. "Evaluation of public–private partnerships: A life-cycle Performance Prism for ensuring value for money," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(6), pages 1133-1153, September.
    18. Jingfeng Yuan & Wenying Ji & Jiyue Guo & Mirosław J. Skibniewski, 2019. "Simulation-based dynamic adjustments of prices and subsidies for transportation PPP projects based on stakeholders’ satisfaction," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 2309-2345, December.
    19. Dag Øivind Madsen & Kåre Slåtten, 2015. "The Balanced Scorecard: Fashion or Virus?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-35, June.
    20. Ibrahim, Awad Elsayed Awad & Hussainey, Khaled & Nawaz, Tasawar & Ntim, Collins & Elamer, Ahmed, 2022. "A systematic literature review on risk disclosure research: State-of-the-art and future research agenda," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    21. Long Li & Zhongfu Li & Lei Jiang & Guangdong Wu & Daojin Cheng, 2018. "Enhanced Cooperation among Stakeholders in PPP Mega-Infrastructure Projects: A China Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:10:y:2020:i:4:p:99-:d:454847. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.