IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/far/spaeco/y2019i1p170-184.html

Analysis of the Sustainability of the ‘Pomogaistvo’ Institution

Author

Listed:
  • Denis Vitalyevich Krylov

    (School of Economics and Management, Far Eastern Federal University)

Abstract

This article discusses the phenomenon of the informal economy. The main emphasis is placed on the ‘pomogaistvo’ institution, which is typical for the border regions of Russia. The functioning of this institution is related to the possibility of duty-free importation of up to 50 kg of various goods, the total value of which does not exceed $1,500 (from January 1, 2019 the rate decreased to 25 kg and $500) in accordance with the customs code of the Eurasian Economic Union. This research is focused on the ‘pomogaistvo’ institution mainly taking place in the sector of the informal economy in Primorsky Krai. The main objectives of the research are: to find out why the ‘pomogaistvo’ institution stopped its work for a year and a half after the currency crisis of 2014, but later regained its activity and former influence; to study how the changing technologies affect the formalization / legalization of the institution of the informal economy. The research is based on qualitative data collected in the field using the following basic methods: in-depth interview and naturalistic observation. The article presents a description of the functioning of the ‘pomogaistvo’ institution, the processes taking place in it, a description of the roles of agents operating within this institution, and an assessment of the scale of this activity in the form of providing an approximate volume of goods imported into the Russian Federation from China. The analysis of the obtained empirical data is carried out on the basis of the positions of the North Douglas institutions concept, and more broadly, in the framework of the new institutional economic theory. As a result of processing the empirical data, it was concluded that institutional inertia and the introduction of electronic commerce technology into this institution were the main factors in the recovery of the ‘pomogaistvo’ institution. A contradiction was found between empirical data and a theory that the integration of technologies that reduce transaction costs in the institution of the informal economy does not lead to the formalization of this institution

Suggested Citation

  • Denis Vitalyevich Krylov, 2019. "Analysis of the Sustainability of the ‘Pomogaistvo’ Institution," Spatial Economics=Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika, Economic Research Institute, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Khabarovsk, Russia), issue 1, pages 170-184.
    • Handle: RePEc:far:spaeco:y:2019:i:1:p:170-184
    DOI: 10.14530/se.2019.1.170-184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.spatial-economics.com/images/spatial-econimics/2019_1/SE.2019.1.170-184.Krylov.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://spatial-economics.com/eng/arkhiv-nomerov/2019/101-2019-1/907-SE-2019-1-170-184
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.14530/se.2019.1.170-184?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kakhkharov, Jakhongir & Akimov, Alexandr & Rohde, Nicholas, 2017. "Transaction costs and recorded remittances in the post-Soviet economies: Evidence from a new dataset on bilateral flows," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 98-107.
    2. Dahlman, Carl J, 1979. "The Problem of Externality," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 22(1), pages 141-162, April.
    3. Feige, Edgar L., 1990. "Defining and estimating underground and informal economies: The new institutional economics approach," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 18(7), pages 989-1002, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Аникина, Надежда & Стукач, Виктор, 2012. "Неформальные Институты Трансакционного Сектора Региона: Агроэкономический Аспект [Informal institutions transaction sector of the region: the agro-economic aspect]," MPRA Paper 74171, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Feb 2016.
    2. Marisa D.M. Vieira & Thomas C. Ponsioen & Mark J. Goedkoop & Mark A.J. Huijbregts, 2016. "Surplus Cost Potential as a Life Cycle Impact Indicator for Metal Extraction," Resources, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-12, January.
    3. Branimir Jovanovic, 2015. "Kalman Filter Estimation of the Unrecorded Economy in Macedonia," Working Papers 2015-02, National Bank of the Republic of North Macedonia.
    4. Pasour, E.C., Jr., 1980. "A Critique Of Federal Agricultural Programs," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 12(01), pages 1-9, July.
    5. Laurent, Catherine & Maxime, Françoise & Mazé, Armelle & Tichit, Muriel, 2003. "Multifonctionnalité de l'agriculture et modèles de l'exploitation agricole," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 273.
    6. Tamara Todorova, 2004. "The Firm in the Context of the Theory of Transaction Costs," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 55-74.
    7. Élodie Bertrand, 2006. "La thèse d'efficience du « théorème de Coase ». Quelle critique de la microéconomie ?," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 57(5), pages 983-1007.
    8. Stanisław Cichocki, 2008. "Shadow economy and its relations with tax system and state budget in Poland 1995 - 2007," Working Papers 2008-05, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    9. Yoonkyo Cho & Taehwan Kim & Jaewhak Roh, 2021. "An analysis of the effects of electronic commerce on the Korean economy using the CGE model," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 831-854, September.
    10. Luis Felipe Fajardo Pineda & Andr�s Fernando Pava Vargas, 2021. "La evaluación multicriterio en la ubicación de las ventas ambulantes en Tibasosa, Boyacá, Colombia," Apuntes del Cenes, Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, vol. 40(72), pages 151-179.
    11. Estrin, Saul & Guerrero, Maribel & Mickiewicz, Tomasz, 2024. "A framework for investigating new firm entry: The (limited) overlap between informal-formal and necessity-opportunity entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 39(4).
    12. Goldberg, Victor P., 1983. "Production functions, Transactions Costs and the New Institutionalism," Working Papers 229120, University of California, Davis, Department of Economics.
    13. Nino Kokashvili & Irakli Barbakadze & Ketevani Kapanadze, 2017. "How Participating In The Shadow Economy Affects The Growth Of Latvian Firms," University of Tartu - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Working Paper Series 101, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu (Estonia).
    14. Q M Ahmed & M Haider Hussain, 2008. "Estimating the Black Economy through a Monetary Approach: A Case Study of Pakistan," Economic Issues Journal Articles, Economic Issues, vol. 13(1), pages 45-60, March.
    15. Andres Ruiz Serrano & Andrea Musumeci & Juan Julie Li & Mauricio Ruiz Serrano & Carolina Serrano Barquin, 2025. "Rationality and the exploitation of natural resources: a psychobiological conceptual model for sustainability," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 13167-13189, June.
    16. Ahmad, Waqar & Hussain, Babar, 2023. "Fiscal Policy Effects on Shadow Economy: Empirical Evidence from Developing Countries," Asian Journal of Applied Economics, Kasetsart University, Center for Applied Economics Research, vol. 30(2), July.
    17. Phillips, Willard, 2012. "Regional environmental policy and sustainable tourism development in the Caribbean," Studies and Perspectives – ECLAC Subregional Headquarters for The Caribbean 5051, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    18. Jascha-Alexander Koch & Jens Lausen & Moritz Kohlhase, 2021. "Internalizing the externalities of overfunding: an agent-based model approach for analyzing the market dynamics on crowdfunding platforms," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 91(9), pages 1387-1430, November.
    19. Arash Kordestani & Setayesh Sattari & Kaveh Peighambari & Pejvak Oghazi, 2017. "Exclude Me Not: The Untold Story of Immigrant Entrepreneurs in Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-22, September.
    20. Dinghuan Yuan & Haijun Bao & Yung Yau & Yancun Lin, 2024. "Why Do Heterogeneous Outcomes Emerge in Urban Village Redevelopment? A Comparative Study of Four Cases in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D02 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact
    • F33 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - International Monetary Arrangements and Institutions
    • C83 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Survey Methods; Sampling Methods

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:far:spaeco:y:2019:i:1:p:170-184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sergey Rogov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecrinru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.