IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejisjr/157.html

Identifying the Drivers of Food Security Based on Perception among Households in South Western Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Wasiu Olayinka FAWOLE

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey)

Abstract

Food insecurity has been considered lately as one of the developmental challenges facing developing nations particularly the sub-Saharan Africa that if not curtailed may have embarrassing consequences not only to the affected area but to humanity in general due to instability that may occur. This study aimed to identify those factors that influence food security and how they did to guide the relevant stakeholders in the design and implementation of food programmes. The study assessed food security of the households based on perception of heads/appointed representatives and logistic regression model to identify its drivers in respective households. The findings of the study revealed that majority of households investigated (60.2 percent) showed varying degrees of food insecurity and hunger while those living with moderate hunger were leading by 31.6 percent. Furthermore, logistic regression analysis results showed that eight of the ten explanatory variables such as income, access to credit and public health facilities among others as specified in the model significantly influenced the food security of the sampled households.

Suggested Citation

  • Wasiu Olayinka FAWOLE, 2017. "Identifying the Drivers of Food Security Based on Perception among Households in South Western Nigeria," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 3, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejisjr:157
    DOI: 10.26417/ejis.v9i1.p49-55
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejis/article/view/1579
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://revistia.com/files/articles/ejis_v3_i4_17/Wasiu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/ejis.v9i1.p49-55?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tako, Antuela A. & Robinson, Stewart, 2010. "Model development in discrete-event simulation and system dynamics: An empirical study of expert modellers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 784-794, December.
    2. Homer, J.B. & Hirsch, G.B., 2006. "System dynamics modeling for public health: Background and opportunities," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 96(3), pages 452-458.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meimei Wang & Steffen Flessa, 2020. "Modelling Covid-19 under uncertainty: what can we expect?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(5), pages 665-668, July.
    2. Hazhir Rahmandad, 2012. "Impact of Growth Opportunities and Competition on Firm-Level Capability Development Trade-offs," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 138-154, February.
    3. Erika Palmer, 2018. "The Heavy Cost of Care: Systemic Challenges in Norwegian Work Absenteeism," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Simon K Chiu & Louise Freebairn & Louise A Baur & L. Kurt Kreuger & Adam Skinner & Jo‐An Occhipinti, 2023. "Modeling distribution parameters in system dynamics: an application in childhood obesity," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 39(2), pages 103-124, April.
    5. Hardcopf, Rick & Gonçalves, Paulo & Linderman, Kevin & Bendoly, Elliot, 2017. "Short-term bias and strategic misalignment in operational solutions: Perceptions, tendencies, and traps," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(3), pages 1004-1021.
    6. Therese Riley & Liza Hopkins & Maria Gomez & Seanna Davidson & Daniel Chamberlain & Jessica Jacob & Sonia Wutzke, 2021. "A Systems Thinking Methodology for Studying Prevention Efforts in Communities," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 34(5), pages 555-573, October.
    7. Zhe Zhao & Xin Xuan & Fan Zhang & Ying Cai & Xiaoyu Wang, 2022. "Scenario Analysis of Renewable Energy Development and Carbon Emission in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-13, September.
    8. Hassmiller Lich, Kristen & Urban, Jennifer Brown & Frerichs, Leah & Dave, Gaurav, 2017. "Extending systems thinking in planning and evaluation using group concept mapping and system dynamics to tackle complex problems," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 254-264.
    9. Bidhan Bhuson Roy & Qingshi Tu, 2022. "A review of system dynamics modeling for the sustainability assessment of biorefineries," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1450-1459, August.
    10. Negar Darabi & Niyousha Hosseinichimeh, 2020. "System dynamics modeling in health and medicine: a systematic literature review," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 36(1), pages 29-73, January.
    11. Emmanuel Yeboah-Assiamah & Kobus Muller & Kwame Ameyaw Domfeh, 2025. "Lessons from the past: a forest policy reform in Ghana through the feedback loop," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 3393-3413, February.
    12. Elizabeth Bruch & Jon Atwell, 2015. "Agent-Based Models in Empirical Social Research," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 44(2), pages 186-221, May.
    13. Mingers, John & White, Leroy, 2010. "A review of the recent contribution of systems thinking to operational research and management science," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1147-1161, December.
    14. Gough, Rebecca & Dickerson, Charles & Rowley, Paul & Walsh, Chris, 2017. "Vehicle-to-grid feasibility: A techno-economic analysis of EV-based energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 12-23.
    15. Monks, Thomas & Robinson, Stewart & Kotiadis, Kathy, 2014. "Learning from discrete-event simulation: Exploring the high involvement hypothesis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 195-205.
    16. Thompson, James P. & Howick, Susan & Belton, Valerie, 2016. "Critical Learning Incidents in system dynamics modelling engagements," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 945-958.
    17. Anaely Aguiar, 2020. "The role of systematic reviews in the system dynamics modelling process," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 892-895, November.
    18. Cyrelle J Tenhagen & Engin Topan & Karin C G M Groothuis-Oudshoorn, 2023. "Predicting the spread of covid-19 and the impact of government measures at the early stage of the pandemic: The Dutch case—Stricter but short-term measures are better," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(5), pages 1-21, May.
    19. Karl M Rich & Matthew J Denwood & Alistair W Stott & Dominic J Mellor & Stuart W J Reid & George J Gunn, 2013. "Systems Approaches to Animal Disease Surveillance and Resource Allocation: Methodological Frameworks for Behavioral Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-1, November.
    20. Cristian Mahulea & Liliana Mahulea & Juan Manuel García Soriano & José Manuel Colom, 2018. "Modular Petri net modeling of healthcare systems," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 329-357, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejisjr:157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.org/index.php/ejis .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.