IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/euc/ancoec/wpaper1163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Senhoriagem ou soberania?

Author

Listed:
  • Wray, L. Randall

Abstract

This paper contrasts the well known concept of seigniorage with sovereignty. The sovereignty approach links the State?s ability to issue a currency denominated in the unit of account it has chosen, without any explicit guarantee that the currency will be converted to anything, to a fundamental power that is directly associated with sovereign nations. Any sovereign State that has the ability to impose tax liabilities will be able to issue a fiat money, to exogenously maintain overnight interest rates, and to deficit spend, purchasing goods and services by crediting bank reserves. It will never need to borrow before it can spend. Many nations have chosen not to exercise this sovereign power, choosing instead to fix exchange rates, to issue government debt denominated in a foreign currency, or to operate with a currency board. This paper will show why this is a mistake, and will argue that the sovereignty approach offers insights into operation of modern money systems that the notion of seigniorage cannot provide.

Suggested Citation

  • Wray, L. Randall, 2002. "Senhoriagem ou soberania?," Revista Economia e Sociedade, Instituto de Economia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), vol. 19, pages 1-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:euc:ancoec:wpaper:1163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.eco.unicamp.br/images/arquivos/artigos/541/01-wray.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Perry Mehrling, 2000. "Modern Money: Fiat or Credit?," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 397-406, March.
    2. Stephanie Bell, 2000. "Do Taxes and Bonds Finance Government Spending?," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 603-620, September.
    3. Charles Goodhart, 1989. "Money, Information and Uncertainty: 2nd Edition," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 2, volume 1, number 0262071223, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:euc:ancoec:v:19:y:2002:p:193-211 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. L. Randall Wray, 2007. "Endogenous Money: Structuralist and Horizontalist," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_512, Levy Economics Institute.
    3. Camera, Gabriele, 2001. "Dirty money," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 377-415, April.
    4. William Van Lear, 2011. "Economic Crisis and the Fiscal Challenge of the State," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(6), pages 61-77.
    5. Ronny Mazzocchi & Roberto Tamborini, 2019. "Current Account Imbalances and the Euro Area: Alternative Views," EconPol Working Paper 27, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    6. Berentsen, Aleksander & Monnet, Cyril, 2008. "Monetary policy in a channel system," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(6), pages 1067-1080, September.
    7. Marc Audi & Amjad Ali, 2023. "Public Policy and Economic Misery Nexus: A Comparative Analysis of Developed and Developing World," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 13(3), pages 56-73, May.
    8. Alberto ZAZZARO, 2002. "How Heterodox is the Heterodoxy of the Monetary Circuit Theory? The Nature of Money and the Microeconomy of the Circuit," Working Papers 163, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    9. Charles A.E. Goodhart & Pojanart Sunirand & Dimitrios P. Tsomocos, 2005. "A risk assessment model for banks," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 197-224, September.
    10. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/4ppcskgnsc8tmbhdrupis355j7 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Francesco Saraceno & Roberto Tamborini, 2015. "How can it work? On the impact of quantitative easing in the Eurozone," DEM Working Papers 2015/03, Department of Economics and Management.
    12. Maurizio Trapanese, 2025. "Financial stability considerations on bail-in," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 968, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    13. Jan Marc Berk, 2002. "Central banking and financial innovation. A survey of the modern literature," BNL Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 55(222), pages 263-297.
    14. L. Randall Wray, 2008. "Banking, Finance and Money: A Social Economics Approach," Chapters, in: John B. Davis & Wilfred Dolfsma (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Social Economics, chapter 27, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Nadia F. Piffaretti, 1998. "A Theoretical Approach to Electronic Money," FSES Working Papers 302, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Freiburg/Fribourg Switzerland.
    16. Brett Fiebiger, 2016. "Fiscal Policy, Monetary Policy and the Mechanics of Modern Clearing and Settlement Systems," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 590-608, October.
    17. Zhang, Chengping & Ramse, Jonathan, 2021. "Teaching economics behind the global COVID-19 pandemic," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    18. Ehnts, Dirk H., 2020. "The fiscal-monetary nexus in Germany," IPE Working Papers 138/2020, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
    19. Vipul Bhatt & Andre R. Neveu, 2019. "Re-Thinking Debt Burden: Going with the Flow?," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 45(2), pages 179-203, April.
    20. Thomas I. Palley, 2015. "The Critics of Modern Money Theory (MMT) are Right," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 45-61, January.
    21. Presser, Mario Ferreira, 2000. "Políticas macroeconômicas e regimes cambiais: uma resenha crítica da contribuição do mainstream na década de 80," Revista Economia e Sociedade, Instituto de Economia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), vol. 14, pages 1-46, January.
    22. L. Randall Wray, 2014. "From the State Theory of Money to Modern Money Theory: An Alternative to Economic Orthodoxy," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_792, Levy Economics Institute.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:euc:ancoec:wpaper:1163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Carolina Troncoso Baltar (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ieuecbr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.