IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxy2017i3bp277-289.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conception of Managing of Fuzzy-Institutional Meso-Level Organizational Separations in a Context of Product Projects Internationalization

Author

Listed:
  • Dmitriev Oleg Nikolaevich
  • Novikov Sergey Vyacheslavovich

Abstract

The paper covers many conceptual design solutions related to the management of meso-level organizational separations operating in economy, which are institutionally fully or partly undetermined or fuzzy as a generalization (which are non-existent de jure, and take place in economy de facto). They belong to a considerable variety of countries of their member enterprises and various operational areas. An important feature is that they are fully or partially (some of the members) dynamically and considerably belong to heterogeneous countries with different law, economic, information and engineering systems, including the level of advancement in post-industrial society. It is proposed to determine a certain typological variety of such separations and to treat them as pseudo-corporation. Among such pseudo-corporations are enterprises, which are involved in product projects implementation as well as those, including the enterprises won of a number kind of contests. As a result, management in objective product localization is transformed into a kind of an intercorporate one. It is suggested that for this type a conceptual scheme of technical and economical evaluation of in-house management solutions should be applied.

Suggested Citation

  • Dmitriev Oleg Nikolaevich & Novikov Sergey Vyacheslavovich, 2017. "Conception of Managing of Fuzzy-Institutional Meso-Level Organizational Separations in a Context of Product Projects Internationalization," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4B), pages 277-289.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xx:y:2017:i:3b:p:277-289
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ersj.eu/dmdocuments/2017-xx-4-b-21.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrick M. Kreiser & Louis D. Marino & K. Mark Weaver, 2002. "Assessing the Psychometric Properties of the Entrepreneurial Orientation Scale: A Multi-Country Analysis," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 26(4), pages 71-93, July.
    2. E.S. Akopova & N.V. Przhedetskaya, 2016. "Imperative of State in the Process of Establishment of Innovational Economy in the Globalizing World," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 79-85.
    3. Michael A. Hitt & R. Duane Ireland & S. Michael Camp & Donald L. Sexton, 2001. "Strategic entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(6‐7), pages 479-491, June.
    4. G. Tomas M. Hult & David J. Ketchen, 2001. "Does market orientation matter?: a test of the relationship between positional advantage and performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(9), pages 899-906, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iqbal Alan Abdullah & Aripin, 2017. "The Effect of Entrepreneurship and Regulation Policy on Competitive Advantage," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4A), pages 298-307.
    2. Wickramaratne, Aruni & Kiminami, Akira & Yagi, Hironori, 2017. "External relationships and entrepreneurial orientation of tea manufacturing firms in Sri Lanka," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 20(3), January.
    3. Li Peng & Yuan Li & Marc Essen & Mike W. Peng, 2020. "Institutions, resources, and strategic orientations: A meta-analysis," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 499-529, June.
    4. Hwan Jin Kim, 2018. "Reconciling Entrepreneurial Orientation and Dynamic Capabilities: A Strategic Entrepreneurship Perspective," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 27(2), pages 180-208, September.
    5. Tobias Kollmann & Christoph Stöckmann, 2014. "Filling the Entrepreneurial Orientation–Performance Gap: The Mediating Effects of Exploratory and Exploitative Innovations," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 38(5), pages 1001-1026, September.
    6. Ghodbane Adel & Affes Habib, 2018. "Mediating Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation on the Relationship Between Relational Network and Competitive Advantages of Tunisian Contractors," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 9(2), pages 665-679, June.
    7. Syed Shah Alam & Vijayesvaran Arumugam & Noor Gani Mohd Nor & Pushpa Kaliappan & Lee Sze Fang, 2013. "Relationships between Innovation Capabilities, Business Performance, Marketing Performance and Financial Performance: A Literature Review," Business and Management Horizons, Macrothink Institute, vol. 1(1), pages 59-73, June.
    8. Peris Ortiz, Marta & Rueda Armengot, Carlos & Palacios Marqués, Daniel, 2016. "Is it possible to measure social entrepreneurship in firms?," Cuadernos de Gestión, Universidad del País Vasco - Instituto de Economía Aplicada a la Empresa (IEAE).
    9. Wu, Chih-Wen, 2013. "Global-innovation strategy modeling of biotechnology industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 1994-1999.
    10. Henri, Jean-Francois, 2006. "Management control systems and strategy: A resource-based perspective," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 529-558, August.
    11. Schweiger, & Baldauf,, 2016. "„Entrepreneurial Orientation“: Eine Bestandsaufnahme der Konstruktschärfe," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 70(4), pages 423-447.
    12. Zhaoyang Guo & Wei Jiang, 2020. "Risk-taking for entrepreneurial new entry: risk-taking dimensions and contingencies," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 739-781, June.
    13. Sahi, Gurjeet Kaur & Gupta, Mahesh C. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2020. "The effects of strategic orientation on operational ambidexterity: A study of indian SMEs in the industry 4.0 era," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    14. Siriram, Rajenlall, 2022. "An innovative approach to overcoming technological challenges and improving firm performance in South Africa," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    15. David Urbano & Andreu Turro & Mike Wright & Shaker Zahra, 2022. "Corporate entrepreneurship: a systematic literature review and future research agenda," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 1541-1565, December.
    16. Gunday, Gurhan & Ulusoy, Gunduz & Kilic, Kemal & Alpkan, Lutfihak, 2011. "Effects of innovation types on firm performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 662-676, October.
    17. Patrick M. Kreiser, 2011. "Entrepreneurial Orientation and Organizational Learning: The Impact of Network Range and Network Closure," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(5), pages 1025-1050, September.
    18. Felipe Hernández-Perlines & Juan Moreno-García & Benito Yáñez-Araque, 2019. "The influence of socioemotional wealth in the entrepreneurial orientation of family businesses," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 523-544, June.
    19. Swen Nadkarni & Reinhard Prügl, 2021. "Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 233-341, April.
    20. Aziz Barhmi & Omar Hajaji, 2023. "Multidisciplinary Approach to Supply Chain Resilience: Conceptualization and Scale Development," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2023(5), pages 43-69.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xx:y:2017:i:3b:p:277-289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.