IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiy2024ispecialap454-467.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Open Strategy: A Modern Approach to Strategy Formulation – Theory and Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Jezak
  • Joanna Jagiello

Abstract

Purpose: This article aims to review and synthesize world research related to Open Strategy, a contemporary concept of inclusive and transparent strategy formulation, selection and implementation. The trend of openness, with its hallmarks of transparent access to information and the demand for stakeholder inclusion, has become a global social expectation in almost all dimensions of life, including strategy development. At the same time, the need to reconcile effectively multiple stakeholders’ interests and still be able to build coherent strategy remains the field of focus for scientists and business practitioners. Open Strategy may help to solve this dilemma and become an efficient framework for building coalition of interests among multiple stakeholders. Design/Methodology/Approach: This study employs a systematic literature review (SLR) with bibliometric analysis to identify genesis and key characteristics of OS concept. Comprehensive analysis of most relevant articles from top rated journals has been applied to understand scientific achievements of this research stream and implications of OS concept to strategy practice. Findings: The analysis reveals Open Strategy brings fundamental changes to strategy process and is the opposite of the classic strategy development. Its attributes alter from "confidential" and "exclusive for top management" to "transparent" and "inclusive". In the research we raise two questions: RQ1 What are the genesis and characteristics of OS?and RQ2 What are the changes OS concept is bringing to the process of strategy formulation and selection?We respond to the first question with systematic literature review (SLR) of OS research published between 2007 and November 2024, identifying key contributors (researchers and research centres) and key attributes of the concept established. We leverage bibliometric analysis of key words clusters to identify key themes and connections. Based on this we elaborate on the concept, analyse seminal works and identify connected research streams. They are centered around open innovation, transparency, inclusion, strategy as practice and recently collaborative governance. Practical Implications: Inclusion of stakeholders and transparency of information form major expectations towards company governance in the modern economy. As the review presents, openness in strategy process can bring many benefits but carries certain risks at the same time. Executives need to build their understanding of Open Strategy to balance openness and closure depending on the business situation. Originality/Value: This study provides the comprehensive analysis of Open Strategy, its characteristics and practical implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Jezak & Joanna Jagiello, 2024. "Open Strategy: A Modern Approach to Strategy Formulation – Theory and Practice," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special A), pages 454-467.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:speciala:p:454-467
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3704/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. Whittington & Ludovic Cailluet & B. Yakis-Douglas, 2011. "Opening Strategy: Evolution of a Precarious Profession," Post-Print halshs-00738389, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kozarkiewicz Alina, 2018. "Between it and Societal Shift: Preconditions of Open Strategizing," Management Sciences. Nauki o Zarządzaniu, Sciendo, vol. 23(4), pages 3-8, December.
    2. Darbi, William Phanuel Kofi & Knott, Paul, 2016. "Strategising practices in an informal economy setting: A case of strategic networking," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 400-413.
    3. Theresa Langenmayr & David Seidl & Violetta Splitter, 2024. "Interdiscursive struggles: Managing the co‐existence of the conventional and open strategy discourse," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(9), pages 1696-1730, September.
    4. Bjorn Remneland Wikhamn & Alexander Styhre, 2019. "Open Innovation Groundwork," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(02), pages 1-29, January.
    5. Jan Oliver Schwarz, 2022. "From alternative pictures of the future to an organizational intervention: A commentary on Rowland and Spaniol," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(1), March.
    6. Radomska Joanna & Hajdas Monika & Wołczek Przemysław & Glinka Beata, 2023. "Wide open? Creative industries and open strategizing challenges," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 59(2), pages 117-136, June.
    7. Stéphanie Dameron & Christophe Torset, 2014. "The Discursive Construction of Strategists' Subjectivities: Towards a Paradox Lens on Strategy," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(2), pages 291-319, March.
    8. Raphaël Maucuer & Alexandre Renaud, 2019. "Company’s Business Models and NGOs: Inputs from the Partnerships Portfolio [Business models de l’entreprise et ONG : contributions du portefeuille de partenariats]," Post-Print hal-02062146, HAL.
    9. Alex Wright, 2022. "I, strategist," Post-Print hal-04577428, HAL.
    10. Paul Knott & Chatchai Thnarudee, 2022. "Strategic planning as inter-unit coordination: An in depth case study in Thailand," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 201-224, March.
    11. Michael A. Zaggl & Arvind Malhotra & Oliver Alexy & Ann Majchrzak, 2023. "Governing crowdsourcing for unconstrained innovation problems," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(11), pages 2783-2817, November.
    12. Splitter, Violetta & David Seidl & Whittington, Richard, 2018. "Lower-level employees’ participation in strategy making over time," SocArXiv jr8bs, Center for Open Science.
    13. Merendino, Alessandro & Dibb, Sally & Meadows, Maureen & Quinn, Lee & Wilson, David & Simkin, Lyndon & Canhoto, Ana, 2018. "Big data, big decisions: The impact of big data on board level decision-making," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 67-78.
    14. Pittz, Thomas G. & Adler, Terry R., 2023. "Open strategy as a catalyst for innovation: Evidence from cross-sector social partnerships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    15. Valérie-Inès de La Ville & Eléonore Mounoud, 2015. "A Narrative to Approach to Strategy as Practice: strategy making from texts and narratives," Post-Print halshs-01390100, HAL.
    16. Eero Vaara & Juha-Antti Lamberg, 2016. "Taking historical embeddedness seriously : Three historical approaches to advance strategy process and practice research," Post-Print hal-02276732, HAL.
    17. Demir, Robert, 2014. "Strategic Activity as Bundled Affordances," Ratio Working Papers 243, The Ratio Institute.
    18. Raphaël Maucuer & Alexandre Renaud, 2019. "Company's Business Models and NGOs: Inputs from the Partnerships Portfolio," Post-Print hal-02403835, HAL.
    19. Innan Sasaki & Josip Kotlar & Davide Ravasi & Eero Vaara, 2020. "Dealing with revered past: Historical identity statements and strategic change in Japanese family firms," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 590-623, March.
    20. Adobor, Henry, 2019. "Opening up strategy formulation: Benefits, risks, and some suggestions," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 383-393.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Strategy process; openness; stakeholders; transparency; inclusion; participation.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • D00 - Microeconomics - - General - - - General
    • D02 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact
    • D04 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Microeconomic Policy: Formulation; Implementation; Evaluation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:speciala:p:454-467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.