IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiy2024ispecialap454-467.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Open Strategy: A Modern Approach to Strategy Formulation – Theory and Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Jezak
  • Joanna Jagiello

Abstract

Purpose: This article aims to review and synthesize world research related to Open Strategy, a contemporary concept of inclusive and transparent strategy formulation, selection and implementation. The trend of openness, with its hallmarks of transparent access to information and the demand for stakeholder inclusion, has become a global social expectation in almost all dimensions of life, including strategy development. At the same time, the need to reconcile effectively multiple stakeholders’ interests and still be able to build coherent strategy remains the field of focus for scientists and business practitioners. Open Strategy may help to solve this dilemma and become an efficient framework for building coalition of interests among multiple stakeholders. Design/Methodology/Approach: This study employs a systematic literature review (SLR) with bibliometric analysis to identify genesis and key characteristics of OS concept. Comprehensive analysis of most relevant articles from top rated journals has been applied to understand scientific achievements of this research stream and implications of OS concept to strategy practice. Findings: The analysis reveals Open Strategy brings fundamental changes to strategy process and is the opposite of the classic strategy development. Its attributes alter from "confidential" and "exclusive for top management" to "transparent" and "inclusive". In the research we raise two questions: RQ1 What are the genesis and characteristics of OS?and RQ2 What are the changes OS concept is bringing to the process of strategy formulation and selection?We respond to the first question with systematic literature review (SLR) of OS research published between 2007 and November 2024, identifying key contributors (researchers and research centres) and key attributes of the concept established. We leverage bibliometric analysis of key words clusters to identify key themes and connections. Based on this we elaborate on the concept, analyse seminal works and identify connected research streams. They are centered around open innovation, transparency, inclusion, strategy as practice and recently collaborative governance. Practical Implications: Inclusion of stakeholders and transparency of information form major expectations towards company governance in the modern economy. As the review presents, openness in strategy process can bring many benefits but carries certain risks at the same time. Executives need to build their understanding of Open Strategy to balance openness and closure depending on the business situation. Originality/Value: This study provides the comprehensive analysis of Open Strategy, its characteristics and practical implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Jezak & Joanna Jagiello, 2024. "Open Strategy: A Modern Approach to Strategy Formulation – Theory and Practice," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special A), pages 454-467.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:speciala:p:454-467
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3704/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Strategy process; openness; stakeholders; transparency; inclusion; participation.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • D00 - Microeconomics - - General - - - General
    • D02 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact
    • D04 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Microeconomic Policy: Formulation; Implementation; Evaluation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:speciala:p:454-467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.