IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiy2024i2p693-715.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Evolution of Employee Well-Being Interest in Management Sciences: Bibliometric and Scientometric Analyses

Author

Listed:
  • Iwona Oleniuch

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to assess the state of research on employee well-being and to answer the following questions: Q1. What was, is and will be the research context related to employee well-being? Q2. Who is the most influential author who it is worth collaborating with in research? Q3. Which scientific organizations should be contacted when planning research projects? Q4. In which journals should one publish to reach the largest number of people interested in the issue of employee well-being? Design/Methodology/Approach: The analysis covered publications obtained from the Web of Science Core Collection for the period from 1989 (the first publication in this area of knowledge) to the end of 2023. The collection consisted of 1,720 items. The VOSviewer program was used for the scientometric analysis, and UCINET 6 for Windows with the NetDraw 2 application for the analysis of centrality measures. Findings: The analyses allowed us to answer the following questions: Q1. The most important research contexts are employee well-being considered from the employee's perspective, the importance of employee well-being for the organization and employee well-being in the context of leadership. An evolution of interest can be observed from the initial search for definitions of concepts and theoretical models to the currently prevailing practical research using statistical modeling. Further multidisciplinary practical research should be expected, using modeling and developing specific diagnostic tools for the needs of management sciences. Q2. Based on the analysis of centrality measures, the following can be recommended as potential co-authors for further research: B.A. Bakker, A. van den Broeck, M. van Veldhoven and H. de Witte. Q3. The organizations that create the greatest potential for cooperation in projects in the field of employee well-being are: Erasmus University Rotterdam and Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. Q4. The first-choice journals for researchers studying employee well-being in the context of management should be: Personnel Review, International Journal of Human Resource Management and Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. Practical Implications: The obtained results may be a hint for scientists interested in various contexts of employee well-being for further research and for cooperation with indicated researchers and organizations. Taking into account the indications resulting from the study should increase the effectiveness of disseminating the results of their research and acquired knowledge. Originality/Value: This is the first article to undertake scientometric research and analyze centrality measures in the field of employee well-being. This topic, although considered in the context of management sciences for 35 years, has not yet been analyzed in this way. This study helps fill this research gap.

Suggested Citation

  • Iwona Oleniuch, 2024. "The Evolution of Employee Well-Being Interest in Management Sciences: Bibliometric and Scientometric Analyses," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 693-715.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:2:p:693-715
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3812/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yanto Chandra, 2018. "Mapping the evolution of entrepreneurship as a field of research (1990–2013): A scientometric analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, January.
    2. Jacob Wood & Woocheol Kim & Gohar Feroz Khan, 2016. "Work engagement in organizations: a social network analysis of the domain," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(1), pages 317-336, October.
    3. Jiajing Li & Yang Mao & Jingyi Ouyang & Shuanning Zheng, 2022. "A Review of Urban Microclimate Research Based on CiteSpace and VOSviewer Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Xinmin Zhang & Ronald C Estoque & Hualin Xie & Yuji Murayama & Manjula Ranagalage, 2019. "Bibliometric analysis of highly cited articles on ecosystem services," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Erjia Yan & Ying Ding, 2009. "Applying centrality measures to impact analysis: A coauthorship network analysis," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 60(10), pages 2107-2118, October.
    6. Nees Jan Eck & Ludo Waltman, 2010. "Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(2), pages 523-538, August.
    7. Vicky Zampeta & Gregory Chondrokoukis, 2023. "Maritime Transportation Accidents: A Bibliometric Analysis," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), Democritus University of Thrace (DUTH), Kavala Campus, Greece, vol. 16(1), pages 19-26, October.
    8. José M. Núñez-Sánchez & Ramón Gómez-Chacón & Carmen Jambrino-Maldonado & Jerónimo García-Fernández, 2021. "Corporate Well-Being Programme in COVID-19 Times. The Mahou San Miguel Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, May.
    9. Bei Wen & Edwin Horlings & Mariëlle van der Zouwen & Peter van den Besselaar, 2017. "Mapping science through bibliometric triangulation: An experimental approach applied to water research," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(3), pages 724-738, March.
    10. Waltman, Ludo & van Eck, Nees Jan & Noyons, Ed C.M., 2010. "A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 629-635.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roberto Pico-Saltos & Paúl Carrión-Mero & Néstor Montalván-Burbano & Javier Garzás & Andrés Redchuk, 2021. "Research Trends in Career Success: A Bibliometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, April.
    2. Guindalini, Camila & Verreynne, Martie-Louise & Kastelle, Tim, 2021. "Taking scientific inventions to market: Mapping the academic entrepreneurship ecosystem," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    3. Fernando Morante-Carballo & Néstor Montalván-Burbano & Maribel Aguilar-Aguilar & Paúl Carrión-Mero, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Research on Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-29, July.
    4. Yanto Chandra, 2018. "Mapping the evolution of entrepreneurship as a field of research (1990–2013): A scientometric analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, January.
    5. Lutz Bornmann & Robin Haunschild & Sven E. Hug, 2018. "Visualizing the context of citations referencing papers published by Eugene Garfield: a new type of keyword co-occurrence analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(2), pages 427-437, February.
    6. Loet Leydesdorff & Dieter Franz Kogler & Bowen Yan, 2017. "Mapping patent classifications: portfolio and statistical analysis, and the comparison of strengths and weaknesses," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(3), pages 1573-1591, September.
    7. Filippo Corsini & Rafael Laurenti & Franziska Meinherz & Francesco Paolo Appio & Luca Mora, 2019. "The Advent of Practice Theories in Research on Sustainable Consumption: Past, Current and Future Directions of the Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, January.
    8. María Pinto & Rosaura Fernández-Pascual & David Caballero-Mariscal & Dora Sales, 2020. "Information literacy trends in higher education (2006–2019): visualizing the emerging field of mobile information literacy," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(2), pages 1479-1510, August.
    9. Giovanni Matteo & Pierfrancesco Nardi & Stefano Grego & Caterina Guidi, 2018. "Bibliometric analysis of Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment research," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(4), pages 508-516, December.
    10. Ciarli, Tommaso & Ràfols, Ismael, 2019. "The relation between research priorities and societal demands: The case of rice," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 949-967.
    11. Loredana Canfora & Corrado Costa & Federico Pallottino & Stefano Mocali, 2021. "Trends in Soil Microbial Inoculants Research: A Science Mapping Approach to Unravel Strengths and Weaknesses of Their Application," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, February.
    12. Giovanni Abramo & Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo & Flavia Costa, 2012. "Identifying interdisciplinarity through the disciplinary classification of coauthors of scientific publications," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(11), pages 2206-2222, November.
    13. Raymundo das Neves Machado & Benjamín Vargas-Quesada & Jacqueline Leta, 2016. "Intellectual structure in stem cell research: exploring Brazilian scientific articles from 2001 to 2010," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(2), pages 525-537, February.
    14. Ying Huang & Wolfgang Glänzel & Lin Zhang, 2021. "Tracing the development of mapping knowledge domains," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(7), pages 6201-6224, July.
    15. Ludo Waltman & Nees Jan Eck, 2012. "A new methodology for constructing a publication-level classification system of science," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(12), pages 2378-2392, December.
    16. Jun-Ping Qiu & Ke Dong & Hou-Qiang Yu, 2014. "Comparative study on structure and correlation among author co-occurrence networks in bibliometrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(2), pages 1345-1360, November.
    17. Margarida Rodrigues & Cidália Oliveira & MárioFranco & Ana Daniel, 2024. "A Bibliometric Study About the Rural Creative Class: Proposal of a Conceptual Framework and Future Agenda," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 15278-15303, September.
    18. Anthony FJ van Raan, 2024. "Simulating urban scaling with a term linkages network of a university," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(9), pages 2092-2107, November.
    19. Vanessa Ioannoni & Tommaso Vitale & Corrado Costa & Iris Elliott, 2020. "Depicting communities of Romani studies: on the who, when and where of Roma related scientific publications," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(3), pages 1473-1490, March.
    20. Jielan Ding & Per Ahlgren & Liying Yang & Ting Yue, 2018. "Disciplinary structures in Nature, Science and PNAS: journal and country levels," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(3), pages 1817-1852, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Bibliometric analysis; scientometric analysis; employee well-being; VOSviewer; betweenness centrality; eigenvector centrality.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I31 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General Welfare, Well-Being
    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:2:p:693-715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.