IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiiy2025i2p950-960.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate Entrepreneurship and the Ownership Structure of Large Enterprises in Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Lisowska

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to explore the relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and the capital structure of large enterprises operating in Poland. Specifically, the research examines how different forms of capital ownership (domestic, foreign, and mixed) influence the development of entrepreneurial orientation, leadership, strategic resource management, and entrepreneurial culture. Design/Methodology/Approach: A quantitative, longitudinal approach was employed. Data were collected from 100 large Polish enterprises in two waves (2019 and 2022) using CATI and CAWI techniques. Exploratory Factor Analysis was applied to confirm the structure of corporate entrepreneurship dimensions, followed by non-parametric tests (Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s post hoc) to examine differences across capital structures. Findings: The findings reveal significant differences in the levels of selected corporate entrepreneurship dimensions based on capital origin. Firms with foreign or mixed capital scored significantly higher in entrepreneurial orientation, strategic resource management, and top management support than those with solely domestic capital. No significant variation was observed in entrepreneurial leadership, suggesting convergence in managerial practices across ownership types. Practical Implication: These insights provide valuable direction for corporate executives and policymakers. Domestically owned firms can benefit from adopting entrepreneurial practices commonly seen in foreign-invested enterprises, such as innovation support systems, strategic flexibility, and employee engagement initiatives. Public policy could also support entrepreneurship by incentivizing knowledge transfer and international collaboration. Originality/Value: This study contributes to the corporate entrepreneurship literature by identifying capital structure as a significant but underexplored determinant of entrepreneurial behavior in large firms. It emphasizes the role of foreign investment in enhancing innovation, adaptability, and strategic governance within organizations. The findings offer a foundation for comparative, cross-national, and sectoral research.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Lisowska, 2025. "Corporate Entrepreneurship and the Ownership Structure of Large Enterprises in Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 950-960.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxviii:y:2025:i:2:p:950-960
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/4020/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wladyslaw Janasz & Krzysztof Janasz, 2012. "Innovation management in organization," Perspectives of Innovation in Economics and Business (PIEB), Prague Development Center, vol. 11(2), pages 100-109, May.
    2. Jeffrey G. Covin & Dennis P. Slevin, 1991. "A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behavior," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 16(1), pages 7-26, October.
    3. Apostolov Mico, 2016. "Foreign Direct Investments Induced Innovation? A Case Study − Macedonia," Comparative Economic Research, Sciendo, vol. 19(1), pages 5-25, March.
    4. Danny Miller, 1983. "The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(7), pages 770-791, July.
    5. Gupta, Vipin & MacMillan, Ian C. & Surie, Gita, 2004. "Entrepreneurial leadership: developing and measuring a cross-cultural construct," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 241-260, March.
    6. E.C. Martins & F. Terblanche, 2003. "Building organisational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation," European Journal of Innovation Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(1), pages 64-74, March.
    7. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    8. Janasz, Wladyslaw & Janasz, Krzysztof, 2012. "Innovation management in organization," Perspectives of Innovations, Economics and Business (PIEB), Prague Development Center (PRADEC), vol. 10(01-2), pages 1-10, May.
    9. Constance E. Helfat & Margaret A. Peteraf, 2003. "The dynamic resource‐based view: capability lifecycles," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(10), pages 997-1010, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Teece, David J., 2016. "Dynamic capabilities and entrepreneurial management in large organizations: Toward a theory of the (entrepreneurial) firm," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 202-216.
    2. André de Abreu Saraiva Monteiro Alves & Fernando Manuel Pereira de Oliveira Carvalho, 2022. "How Dynamic Managerial Capabilities, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Operational Capabilities Impact Microenterprises’ Global Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.
    3. Marcin Suder, 2025. "Determinant or moderator? Exploring the role of the external environment in the relationship between dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance. Evidence from the hotel industry," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-53, December.
    4. Francesca Maria Cesaroni & Mara Del Baldo & Paola Demartini & Paola Paoloni, 2015. "Entrepreneurial, Renewal and Trust Capital of Italian Firms: Insights from an Empirical Study," International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, ToKnowPress, vol. 4(1), pages 69-89.
    5. Turró, Andreu & Urbano, David & Peris-Ortiz, Marta, 2014. "Culture and innovation: The moderating effect of cultural values on corporate entrepreneurship," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 360-369.
    6. Esthela Galván-Vela & Eduardo Arango Herrera & Deisy Milena Sorzano Rodríguez & Rafael Ravina-Ripoll, 2021. "State-of-the-Art Analysis of Intrapreneurship: A Review of the Theoretical Construct and Its Bibliometrics," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Li Peng & Yuan Li & Marc Essen & Mike W. Peng, 2020. "Institutions, resources, and strategic orientations: A meta-analysis," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 499-529, June.
    8. Yunis, Manal & Tarhini, Abbas & Kassar, Abdulnasser, 2018. "The role of ICT and innovation in enhancing organizational performance: The catalysing effect of corporate entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 344-356.
    9. repec:isv:jouijm:v:4:y:2015:i:1:p:69-89 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Tânia Gonçalves & Mário Sérgio Teixeira & José G. Dias & Sofia Gouveia & Ricardo Jorge Correia, 2021. "Commitment to exporting as an antecedent of organizational skills and firm performance," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 91(7), pages 1063-1084, September.
    11. Engelen, Andreas & Kube, Harald & Schmidt, Susanne & Flatten, Tessa Christina, 2014. "Entrepreneurial orientation in turbulent environments: The moderating role of absorptive capacity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(8), pages 1353-1369.
    12. Osama Musa Ali Al-Darras & Cem Tanova, 2022. "From Big Data Analytics to Organizational Agility: What Is the Mechanism?," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, June.
    13. Nadia Zahoor & Yong Kyu Lew, 2022. "Sustaining superior international performance: Strategic orientations and dynamic capability of environmentally concerned small‐ and medium‐sized enterprises," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 1002-1017, March.
    14. Mitja Ruzzier & Evan J. Douglas & Maja Konečnik Ruzzier & Jana Hojnik, 2020. "International Entrepreneurial Orientation and the Intention to Internationalize," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-19, July.
    15. Hwan Jin Kim, 2018. "Reconciling Entrepreneurial Orientation and Dynamic Capabilities: A Strategic Entrepreneurship Perspective," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 27(2), pages 180-208, September.
    16. Navarro-García, Antonio & Ledesma-Chaves, Pablo & Gil-Cordero, Eloy & De-Juan-Vigaray, María Dolores, 2024. "Intangible resources, static and dynamic capabilities and perceived competitive advantage in exporting firms. A PLS-SEM/fsQCA approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    17. Encarnacion García-Sánchez & Víctor Jesús García-Morales & Rodrigo Martín-Rojas, 2018. "Analysis of the influence of the environment, stakeholder integration capability, absorptive capacity, and technological skills on organizational performance through corporate entrepreneurship," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 345-377, June.
    18. Zahra, Shaker A. & Garvis, Dennis M., 2000. "International corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: The moderating effect of international environmental hostility," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 15(5-6), pages 469-492.
    19. Shaker A. Zahra & Anders P. Nielsen & William C. Bogner, 1999. "Corporate Entrepreneurship, Knowledge, and Competence Development," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 23(3), pages 169-189, April.
    20. Maryono & Imam Ghozali & Amie Kusumawardhani & R. Mahelan Prabantarikso & Firdaus Basbeth, 2020. "Entrepreneurial Orientation in Government-Owned Bank: Do They Improve Competitive Advantage?," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(2), pages 262-270, April.
    21. Hui Ding, 2024. "Unraveling the Nexus between Entrepreneurial Orientation, Effect Reasoning, and Digital Transformation in Enterprises," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 39(1), pages 143-161.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L26 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Entrepreneurship
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • D22 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxviii:y:2025:i:2:p:950-960. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.