IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiiy2025i2p853-867.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Do Executives Define Corporate Entrepreneurship? A Longitudinal Analysis of Large Enterprises in Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Lisowska

Abstract

Purpose: This study explores how corporate entrepreneurship is perceived in large enterprises and how it contributes to their strategic development and competitive positioning. The research responds to the identified gap in both domestic and international literature regarding comprehensive insights into the dimensions and perception of corporate entrepreneurship. Design/Methodology/Approach: The study was conducted in two waves, in 2019 and 2022, using a structured questionnaire administered via CATI and CAWI methods. The sample consisted of 100 large enterprises operating in Poland, across various sectors. Respondents were asked to select one of five definitions of corporate entrepreneurship that best reflected their organizational practice, enabling a comparative analysis across time. Findings: The findings show a notable shift in the perception of corporate entrepreneurship between 2019 and 2022. While the importance of innovation (Definition A) remained relatively stable, there was a significant decline in support for continuous employee engagement in internal innovation processes (Definition B). Conversely, Definitions D and E, emphasizing risk-taking and the social impact of entrepreneurship respectively, gained in popularity. The results indicate an evolving orientation toward more dynamic, externally focused, and socially aware forms of entrepreneurship, reflecting changes in the macroeconomic environment and post-pandemic business priorities. Practical Implication: The research highlights the growing strategic role of innovation, risk-taking, and social responsibility in large enterprises. Understanding how corporate entrepreneurship is interpreted can guide decision-makers in aligning entrepreneurial initiatives with organizational development goals, especially in times of uncertainty. Originality/Value: This study offers a longitudinal perspective on corporate entrepreneurship in large enterprises and introduces a novel methodological approach by comparing executive preferences across predefined definitions. It enriches the understanding of how corporate entrepreneurship evolves in practice and offers insight into the strategic mindset of business leaders in large organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Lisowska, 2025. "How Do Executives Define Corporate Entrepreneurship? A Longitudinal Analysis of Large Enterprises in Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 853-867.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxviii:y:2025:i:2:p:853-867
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/4014/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L26 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Entrepreneurship
    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • D22 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxviii:y:2025:i:2:p:853-867. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.