IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021i4-part1p723-736.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Changes in the Strategies and Structures of Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations during the Covid 19 Pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Dariusz Sobotkiewicz

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to present and evaluate the changes that have occurred in the structures and strategies of subsidiaries of multinational corporations in 2020 - 2021 during the Covid 19 pandemic. The goal was implemented through an analysis of the literature on the subject and empirical research in subsidiaries of international corporations located in Poland. Design/Methodology/Approach: The study presents the following research problem: What changes took place in the structures and strategies of subsidiaries of multinational corporations in 2020-2021 during the Covid 19 pandemic? Solving the research problem boiled down to carrying out the research process. For this purpose, the method of analysis of management literature was used and telephone interviews were carried out in subsidiaries of international corporations in the automotive industry. The research was conducted among key suppliers of components for car production in Poland. Findings: The conducted research shows that the changes in the structures of subsidiaries concerned mainly the production area. However, in the case of the strategy, they concerned maintaining the planned sales volume and taking a number of actions to adapt to the new situation. Practical Implications: The results presented in the article can be used by other multi-stakeholder organizations to redesign organizational structures and design more flexible strategies. The results of the research showed changes that were implemented by subsidiaries in order to survive on the market. Originality/ Value: Research has shown that the subsidiaries, by implementing specific changes during COVID 19, could continue to function and achieve the goals included in the corporate strategy. Even though they had to make changes in their organizational structures and strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Dariusz Sobotkiewicz, 2021. "Changes in the Strategies and Structures of Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations during the Covid 19 Pandemic," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4 - Part ), pages 723-736.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:4-part1:p:723-736
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/2623/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henry Mintzberg, 1990. "The design school: Reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(3), pages 171-195, March.
    2. Christophe Roux-Dufort, 2007. "Is Crisis Management (only) a Management of exceptions?," Post-Print hal-02311783, HAL.
    3. Liao, Chechen & Chuang, Shu-Hui & To, Pui-Lai, 2011. "How knowledge management mediates the relationship between environment and organizational structure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(7), pages 728-736, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:4:p:723-736 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Eren Durmus Ozdemir & Saime Mecikoglu, 2016. "A Case Study on Performance Implications of Hybrid Strategy in Automotive Supplier Industry," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(6), pages 31-43, June.
    3. Nikolay Mihaylov, 2016. "Practical Dimensions of the Debate Strategy vs Structure of Trace Group Hold AD," Eastern European Business and Economics Journal, Eastern European Business and Economics Studies Centre, vol. 2(2), pages 129-138.
    4. Siliang Tong & Nan Jia & Xueming Luo & Zheng Fang, 2021. "The Janus face of artificial intelligence feedback: Deployment versus disclosure effects on employee performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(9), pages 1600-1631, September.
    5. Augusto Felício, J. & Rodrigues, Ricardo & Patino-Alonso, Carmen & Felício, Teresa, 2022. "Allostasis and organizational excellence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 107-114.
    6. Cegarra-Navarro, Juan-Gabriel & Soto-Acosta, Pedro & Wensley, Anthony K.P., 2016. "Structured knowledge processes and firm performance: The role of organizational agility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1544-1549.
    7. Alexander T. Nicolai & Thomas W. Thomas, 2004. "Kapitalmarktkonforme Unternehmensführung: Eine Analyse im Lichte der jüngeren Strategieprozesslehre," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 452-469, August.
    8. Homburg, Christian & Krohmer, Harley & Workman, John Jr., 2004. "A strategy implementation perspective of market orientation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(12), pages 1331-1340, December.
    9. Riccardo Vecchiato & Giampiero Favato & Francesco di Maddaloni & Hang Do, 2020. "Foresight, cognition, and long‐term performance: Insights from the automotive industry and opportunities for future research," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(1), March.
    10. Hamid Rahimian & Majid Arash & Abbas Abbaspour & Ali Delavar, 2016. "Offering the Model of Structural Equations for the Parameters of Leadership Thinking, Communication and Meritocracy in Training of the Organizational Leaders of Oil Company," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(10), pages 1-42, October.
    11. Yu, Xiaoyu & Tao, Yida & Tao, Xiangming & Xia, Fan & Li, Yajie, 2018. "Managing uncertainty in emerging economies: The interaction effects between causation and effectuation on firm performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 121-131.
    12. Kémo Balde & David Carassus, 2020. "Analyse de la gouvernance publique locale : proposition d’une grille de lecture et caractérisation exploratoire des pratiques de l’intercommunalité française," Post-Print hal-02404770, HAL.
    13. Charlotte Förster & Caroline Paparella & Stephanie Duchek & Wolfgang H. Güttel, 2022. "Leading in the Paradoxical World of Crises: How Leaders Navigate Through Crises," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 631-657, December.
    14. Douglas Edward Abrahamson & Jane Goodman-Delahunty, 2014. "Impediments to Information and Knowledge Sharing Within Policing," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(1), pages 21582440135, January.
    15. Andrea Cardoni & Filippo Zanin & Francesca Bartolacci & George H. (Jody) Tompson, 2018. "Strategic planning for value creation in business networks. Conceptual framework and theoretical proposals," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(1), pages 17-44.
    16. Fabien Martinez & Ken Peattie & Diego Vazquez‐brust & Diego Vazquez-Brust, 2019. "Beyond win–win: A syncretic theory on corporate stakeholder engagement in sustainable development," Post-Print hal-02887685, HAL.
    17. Liang, Yu & Xu, Junzhuo, 2021. "Crisis response of nursing homes during COVID-19: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 700-710.
    18. Carmine Bianchi, 2021. "“System Dynamics. Theory and Applications” ‐ Edited by Brian Dangerfield," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 37(2-3), pages 241-244, April.
    19. Favato, Giampiero & Vecchiato, Riccardo, 2017. "Embedding real options in scenario planning: A new methodological approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 135-149.
    20. Vedanand, Dr., 2021. "Rethinking Strategy for Global Competitiveness: The Logistics Focus," 31st Annual Canadian Transportation Research Forum, Winnipeg, Manitoba, May 26-29, 1996 314675, Canadian Transportation Research Forum (CTRF).
    21. Robert MacIntosh & Nic Beech, 2011. "Strategy, strategists and fantasy: a dialogic constructionist perspective," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(1), pages 15-37, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L10 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - General
    • L20 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - General
    • L22 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Organization and Market Structure

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:4-part1:p:723-736. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.