Some Considerations on Ending the Process of Economic Transition in Romania and Slovakia
The collapse of the centrally planned economies in Eastern Europe has triggered complex economic reforms in all former communist countries, on their ways towards freemarket economic systems. Their economies have become real, real-scale, and real-time research laboratories. The multifaceted and difficult processes of economic transition were scientifically examined as far as transition trail, duration, transition strategy. Based on the matrix model of economic systems and economic transition, the paper is valuing the authors’ previous research work in the area. The main objective is to answer to the question: when the economic transition ends (when the economic reform is completed). The authors propose several ways to determine the moment when the economic transition ends, and the duration of the process respectively. Several standpoints (political, economical, managerial) are presented. The study was completed in Romania and Slovak Republic. The research results reveal similarities as well as differences; specific issues are discussed. Assessing the end of economic transition is of top importance in the circumstances of the current global crisis. When the economic recession and transition are overlapping, then the “pendulum effect” might appear and the economic reform ends before reaching its objectives. The models of analysis and research results are important for both academics and practitioners – strategists, policy makers, and managers – not only from Romania and Slovakia or other Eastern European countries but any transitional economy.
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Bartlomiej Kaminski, 1998. "Poland's transition from the perspective of performance in EU markets," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 217-239.
- Rafis Abazov, 1997. "Formation of the non-state sector and privatisation in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 431-448.
- Jens Holscher, 1997. "Economic dynamism in transition economies: Lessons from Germany," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 173-181.
- Demetrios Giannaros, 2000. "Did the "shock therapy" approach work in the economic restructuring of Eastern Europe? Some evidence from Poland and Russia: a brief review," Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(1), pages 53-66.
- Arbakhan Magomedov, 1998. "Krasnodar Krai: A 'growth pole' in the transitional economy of Russia?," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 363-374.
- Manijeh Sabi, 1997. "Banking in transition: Development and current problems in Azerbaijan," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 491-499.
- Christian VonHirschhausen, 1998. "Industrial restructuring in Ukraine seven years after independence: From socialism to a planning economy?," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 451-465.
- Mohammed Ishaq, 1997. "The Ukrainian economy and the process of reform," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 501-517.
- Wendy K. T. Gubler & Matthew W. McCarter & Kristie K. W. Seawright & Yuli Zhang, 2008. "Service Recovery in Transition Economies: Russia and China," Managing Global Transitions, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 6(1), pages 23-51.
- John Marangos, 2005. "Alternative models of transition and institutional development," Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(4), pages 390-408.
- Aristidis Bitzenis, 2007. "Political and economic alternatives for the Central and East European Region and China," Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(1), pages 101-122.
- Anatoliy G. Goncharuk, 2006. "Economic Efficiency in Transition: The Case of Ukraine," Managing Global Transitions, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 4(2), pages 129-143.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xiii:y:2010:i:1:p:169-188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Marios Agiomavritis)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.