IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eoq/bjbmjr/art63.html

Factors Influencing Consumer Purchase Intention on Products Communicated through TikTok Live Streaming among GCBS Students

Author

Listed:
  • Acharya, Pingola
  • Choden, Sangay
  • Yangki , Pema
  • Gurung, Samira
  • Nima, Sangay

Abstract

This study investigates the factors influencing consumer purchase intentions during TikTok live streaming among students at Gedu College of Business Studies in Bhutan. As TikTok rapidly gains popularity as a digital marketing platform, understanding the dynamics of live streaming commerce becomes crucial for businesses. Employing a quantitative approach, the research utilizes structured surveys to gather data from 300 respondents, focusing on five key variables: Customer Trust in Seller, Information Quality, Ease of Use, Electronic Word of Mouth (eWOM), and Streamer Attractiveness. The analysis reveals that Customer Trust is the most significant predictor of purchase intention, followed by Information Quality and Streamer Attractiveness. Although Ease of Use and eWOM showed positive correlations with purchase intention, they did not emerge as significant predictors in the regression analysis. The findings underscore the importance of establishing trust, delivering high-quality information, and leveraging streamer attractiveness in enhancing consumer engagement and driving sales. This research provides actionable insights for digital marketers and entrepreneurs in Bhutan, highlighting strategies for optimizing TikTok live streaming practices. By fostering authenticity, ensuring clarity in product information, and enhancing the appeal of streamers, businesses can effectively influence purchasing behavior in this evolving digital landscape. The study lays the groundwork for future research on digital marketing trends in Bhutan, contributing to the broader understanding of consumer behavior in live-streaming environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Acharya, Pingola & Choden, Sangay & Yangki , Pema & Gurung, Samira & Nima, Sangay, 2025. "Factors Influencing Consumer Purchase Intention on Products Communicated through TikTok Live Streaming among GCBS Students," Bhutan Journal of Business and Management, Gedu College of Business Studies, Royal University of Bhutan.
    • Handle: RePEc:eoq:bjbmjr:art63
    DOI: 10.17102/bjbm.v8.2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://bjbm.gcbs.edu.bt/index.php/bjbm/article/view/63
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17102/bjbm.v8.2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tuncer, Ilhami, 2021. "The relationship between IT affordance, flow experience, trust, and social commerce intention: An exploration using the S-O-R paradigm," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    2. Filieri, Raffaele & Alguezaui, Salma & McLeay, Fraser, 2015. "Why do travelers trust TripAdvisor? Antecedents of trust towards consumer-generated media and its influence on recommendation adoption and word of mouth," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 174-185.
    3. Elvira Ismagilova & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Emma Slade & Michael D. Williams, 2017. "Electronic Word of Mouth (eWOM) in the Marketing Context," SpringerBriefs in Business, Springer, number 978-3-319-52459-7, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Al-Adwan, Ahmad Samed & Al-Debei, Mutaz M. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2022. "E-commerce in high uncertainty avoidance cultures: The driving forces of repurchase and word-of-mouth intentions," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    2. Khirul Basar Mim & Tunmin (Catherine) Jai & Stacy H. Lee, 2022. "The Influence of Sustainable Positioning on eWOM and Brand Loyalty: Analysis of Credible Sources and Transparency Practices Based on the S-O-R Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Yan, Min & Filieri, Raffaele & Gorton, Matthew, 2021. "Continuance intention of online technologies: A systematic literature review," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    4. Chen, Hongquan & Zhang, Shuhua & Shao, Bingjia & Zhang, Yong & Zhao, Quanwu, 2026. "Instrumental vs. hedonic Affordances: Examining their impact on repurchase behavior on live commerce platforms through self-determination theory," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    5. Perez-Vega, Rodrigo & Hopkinson, Paul & Singhal, Aishwarya & Mariani, Marcello M., 2022. "From CRM to social CRM: A bibliometric review and research agenda for consumer research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1-16.
    6. Román, Sergio & Riquelme, Isabel P. & Iacobucci, Dawn, 2023. "Fake or credible? Antecedents and consequences of perceived credibility in exaggerated online reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    7. Azer, Jaylan & Anker, Thomas & Taheri, Babak & Tinsley, Ross, 2023. "Consumer-Driven racial stigmatization: The moderating role of race in online consumer-to-consumer reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    8. Ishani Patharia Chopra & Charles Jebarajakirthy & Tanu Jain & Haroon Iqbal Maseeh, 2024. "Electronic shopping cart abandonment: What do we know and where should we be heading?," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-30, December.
    9. José Alberto Martínez-González & Eduardo Parra-López & Almudena Barrientos-Báez, 2021. "Young Consumers’ Intention to Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Integrated Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, January.
    10. Farooq, Ali & Salminen, Joni & Dahabiyeh, Laila & Javed, Yousra & Jansen, Bernard J., 2026. "Does negative buzz result in social media discontinuation? Investigating the effects of negative word of mouth in the United States, India, and Finland," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    11. Koc, Erdogan & Hatipoglu, Sercan & Kivrak, Oguzhan & Celik, Cemal & Koc, Kaan, 2023. "Houston, we have a problem!: The use of ChatGPT in responding to customer complaints," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    12. Wang, Ying & Lan, Jiahui & Pan, Jialing & Fang, Lin, 2024. "How do consumers’ attitudes differ across their basic characteristics toward live-streaming commerce of green agricultural products: A preliminary exploration based on correspondence analysis, logistic regression and decision tree," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    13. Carolina Aldao & Tanja A. Mihalic, 2020. "New Frontiers in Travel Motivation and Social Media: The Case of Longyearbyen, the High Arctic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, July.
    14. T. M. Wanigapura & T. P. S. R. Guruge & I. V. Kuruppu & P. C. Abeysiriwardana, 2025. "Diversified impact of electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) on consumer communities: a developing country perspective," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 52(1), pages 37-53, March.
    15. Čaušević Amra & Fusté-Forné Francesc, 2022. "Local Cuisine in a Tourist City: Food Identity in Sarajevo Restaurant Menus as a Source of Destination Marketing," European Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Recreation, Paradigm, vol. 12(1), pages 61-77, December.
    16. Yuqian Wei & Hengyu Liu & Wenhui Zhuo & Keun-Soo Park, 2025. "The Influence of Social Media Attributes on Impulsive Travel Intentions: Integrating the Stimulus–Organism–Response Theory and Information Adoption Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-19, May.
    17. Perez-Castro, A. & Martínez-Torres, M.R. & Toral, S.L., 2023. "Efficiency of automatic text generators for online review content generation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    18. Yang, Xue, 2021. "Determinants of consumers’ continuance intention to use social recommender systems: A self-regulation perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    19. R. Filieri & F. Acikgoz & D. Hao, 2023. "Electronic word-of-mouth from video bloggers: The role of content quality and source homophily across hedonic and utilitarian products," Post-Print hal-04713695, HAL.
    20. Tseng, Aihua, 2017. "Why do online tourists need sellers' ratings? Exploration of the factors affecting regretful tourist e-satisfaction," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 413-424.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eoq:bjbmjr:art63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tshewang Phuntsho (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bsrubbt.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.