Economic Transition As a Crisis of Vision: Classical versus Neoclassical Theories of General Equilibrium
In this paper we compare the classical general equilibrium framework of Smith and Marx with the neoclassical one of Arrow and Debreu, and find that these competing paradigms of equilibrium clash on a number of critical issues--efficiency, power, the role of markets, time, the nature of exchanges, and the importance of institutions. We argue that it is primarily a neoclassical, Arrow-Debreu vision of the economy that underlies current shock therapy policy recommendations, and that such policy advice has often had devastating effects on the transitional economies. As an alternative, we re-examine transition and economic reform through the theories of the classical economists to suggest policy recommendations.
Volume (Year): 28 (2002)
Issue (Month): 2 (Spring)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Phone: (201) 684-7346
Web page: http://www.ramapo.edu/eea/journal.html
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Rosenberg, Alexander, 1992. "Economics--Mathematical Politics or Science of Diminishing Returns?," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, edition 1, number 9780226727233.
- Bloom, David E. & Malaney, Pia N., 1998. "Macroeconomic consequences of the Russian mortality crisis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 26(11), pages 2073-2085, November.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eej:eeconj:v:28:y:2002:i:2:p:217-240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Victor Matheson, College of the Holy Cross)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.