IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v61y2018icp111-122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating behavioral differences in the choice of distinct Intermediate Public Transport (IPT) modes for work trips in Chennai city

Author

Listed:
  • Kunhikrishnan, Parthan
  • Srinivasan, Karthik K.

Abstract

Intermediate public transport (IPT) modes remain relatively less studied compared to personal vehicle and public transport modes. For instance, the user preferences for different IPT options such as autorickshaws, company or chartered buses, shared autorickshaws etc. are not sufficiently investigated. A lack of understanding about user preferences for IPT and the absence of a strong regulatory framework for these modes have impeded progress towards forming and implementing specific policies directed at IPT. Differences in supply and operating characteristics of various IPT alternatives warrant framing unique policies for each of these modes. However, conventional mode choice models either combine these individual IPT alternatives and/or constrain the coefficients in their utilities to be equal which limits the scope for analysis of distinct and directed policies for each IPT mode. A fully disaggregated model is proposed in this study which relaxes both these restrictions. The proposed model offers two advantages in terms of policy analysis with respect to conventional models: each IPT alternative is analyzed individually as a separate alternative as opposed to a composite alternative; the user preference and responsiveness is allowed to vary across different IPT alternatives. The models are used to evaluate and illustrate the impacts of policy related to regulatory fare structures of autorickshaw. The results provide statistical evidence that combining distinct IPT alternatives or constraining their utilities could lead to bias in model coefficients, inaccurate forecasts, erroneous behavioral inferences and misleading policy evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Kunhikrishnan, Parthan & Srinivasan, Karthik K., 2018. "Investigating behavioral differences in the choice of distinct Intermediate Public Transport (IPT) modes for work trips in Chennai city," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 111-122.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:61:y:2018:i:c:p:111-122
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.10.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X1730700X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.10.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Buehler, Ralph, 2011. "Determinants of transport mode choice: a comparison of Germany and the USA," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 644-657.
    2. Tri Joewono & Hisashi Kubota, 2007. "User satisfaction with paratransit in competition with motorization in indonesia: anticipation of future implications," Transportation, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 337-354, May.
    3. M. K. Haener & P. C. Boxall & W. L. Adamowicz & D. H. Kuhnke, 2004. "Aggregation Bias in Recreation Site Choice Models: Resolving the Resolution Problem," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 80(4).
    4. Cervero, Robert & Golub, Aaron, 2007. "Informal transport: A global perspective," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 14(6), pages 445-457, November.
    5. repec:cdl:uctcwp:qt4nq9r1c9 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kar, Manaswinee & Sadhukhan, Shubhajit & Parida, Manoranjan, 2022. "Assessing commuters’ perceptions towards improvement of intermediate public transport as access modes to metro stations," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 140-155.
    2. Bansal, Prateek & Gadepalli, Ravi & AitBihiOuali, Laila, 2023. "Eliciting mobility preferences of Indians for E-rickshaws: Evidence from Gurugram," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 19-30.
    3. Bhuyan, Atanu & Roy, Vivek, 2024. "Paratransit services and socio-economic planning: A review uncovering critical insights and developmental pathways," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    4. Kah Mun Ng & Choon Wah Yuen & Chiu Chuen Onn & Nik Ibtishamiah Ibrahim, 2024. "Urban Mobility Mode Shift to Active Transport: Sociodemographic Dependency and Potential Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(1), pages 21582440241, January.
    5. Roy, Sanghamitra & Bailey, Ajay & van Noorloos, Femke, 2024. "Understanding the barriers affecting women's mobility in the first- and last-mile stretches in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cristian Domarchi & Juan Enrique Coeymans & Juan de Dios Ortúzar, 2019. "Shared taxis: modelling the choice of a paratransit mode in Santiago de Chile," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 2243-2268, December.
    2. Tiglao, Noriel Christopher C. & De Veyra, Janna M. & Tolentino, Niki Jon Y. & Tacderas, Mark Angelo Y., 2020. "The perception of service quality among paratransit users in Metro Manila using structural equations modelling (SEM) approach," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    3. Sharma, Deepa & Pandit, Debapratim, 2021. "Determining the level of service measures to evaluate service quality of fixed-route shared motorized para-transit services," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 176-186.
    4. Hagen, Jonas Xaver & Pardo, CarlosFelipe & Valente, Johanna Burbano, 2016. "Motivations for motorcycle use for Urban travel in Latin America: A qualitative study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 93-104.
    5. Sobhani, Md. Golam & Imtiyaz, Md. Nafis & Azam, Md. Shafiul & Hossain, Moinul, 2020. "A framework for analyzing the competitiveness of unconventional modes of transportation in developing cities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 504-518.
    6. Kar, Manaswinee & Sadhukhan, Shubhajit & Parida, Manoranjan, 2022. "Assessing commuters’ perceptions towards improvement of intermediate public transport as access modes to metro stations," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 140-155.
    7. Ilan Salomon & Matan E. Singer, 2014. "'Informal Travel': A New Conceptualization of Travel Patterns?," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(5), pages 562-582, September.
    8. Qihao Liu & Yuzheng Liu & Chia-Lin Chen & Enrica Papa & Yantao Ling & Mengqiu Cao, 2023. "Is It Possible to Compete With Car Use? How Buses Can Facilitate Sustainable Transport," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 69-83.
    9. Kamruzzaman, Md. & Baker, Douglas & Washington, Simon & Turrell, Gavin, 2013. "Residential dissonance and mode choice," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 12-28.
    10. Landry, Craig E. & Shonkwiler, J. Scott & Whitehead, John C., 2020. "Economic Values of Coastal Erosion Management: Joint Estimation of Use and Existence Values with recreation demand and contingent valuation data," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    11. Wadud, Zia, 2020. "The effects of e-ridehailing on motorcycle ownership in an emerging-country megacity," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 301-312.
    12. Jaroslav Burian & Lenka Zajíčková & Igor Ivan & Karel Macků, 2018. "Attitudes and Motivation to Use Public or Individual Transport: A Case Study of Two Middle-Sized Cities," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-25, May.
    13. Duque, Ricardo B. & Gray, David & Harrison, Mariah & Davey, Elizabeth, 2014. "Invisible commuters: assessing a university’s eco-friendly transportation policies and commuting behaviours," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 122-136.
    14. Bereitschaft, Bradley, 2020. "Gentrification and the evolution of commuting behavior within America's urban cores, 2000–2015," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    15. Deyas, Gebeyew T. & Woldeamanuel, Mintesnot G., 2020. "Social and economic impacts of public transportation on adjacent communities: The case of the Addis Ababa light rail transit," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    16. Ingvardson, Jesper Bláfoss & Nielsen, Otto Anker, 2018. "How urban density, network topology and socio-economy influence public transport ridership: Empirical evidence from 48 European metropolitan areas," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 50-63.
    17. Haseeb, Attiya & Mitra, Raktim, 2024. "Travel behaviour changes among young adults and associated implications for social sustainability," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    18. Echeverría, Lucía & Giménez-Nadal, J. Ignacio & Alberto Molina, José, 2022. "Who uses green mobility? Exploring profiles in developed countries," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 247-265.
    19. Léa Ravensbergen & Tim Schwanen, 2024. "Community Transport’s Dual Role as a Transport and a Social Scheme: Implications for Policy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(4), pages 1-17, March.
    20. Bautista-Hernández, Dorian Antonio & Trejo Nieto, Alejandra, 2024. "Who uses transit in the journey to work? Multimodality, equity, and planning implications in México City," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:61:y:2018:i:c:p:111-122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.