IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v18y2011i1p194-203.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing Park and Ride with access control: A case study of Southampton

Author

Listed:
  • Hounsell, Nick
  • Shrestha, Birendra
  • Piao, Jinan

Abstract

Implementing and promoting more sustainable forms of urban transport are key policies of Local Authorities throughout the UK. Park and Ride (P&R) is one such system implemented widely in the UK, especially in historic towns and cities with limited road and parking space in the centre. Some cities (e.g. Rome and London) have also implemented forms of 'access control' to reduce congestion and/or pollution in central areas. This paper describes a feasibility analysis of a unique application studied for potential implementation in Southampton--the integration of P&R with access control on a key corridor in Eastern Southampton where traffic demand is likely to increase significantly in the coming years because of new housing developments. The system concept is a P&R facility with express buses to the City centre, keeping the corridor free-flowing for these buses (and other traffic) using a combination of bus lanes and access control. Following an outline of the policy context and system design, this paper then describes the corridor and network modelling undertaken to predict the impacts of the scheme and alternatives of it. This has been based mainly on the CONTRAM dynamic traffic assignment model, which covers the whole of Southampton and its surrounding motorway network. The assessment of the benefits of the various options in this scheme showed that the combination of P&R with signalised access control was the best option to improve the movement of people on the corridor. The paper concludes with a discussion of potential issues for implementation, including the need for complimentary measures and a consistent policy framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Hounsell, Nick & Shrestha, Birendra & Piao, Jinan, 2011. "Enhancing Park and Ride with access control: A case study of Southampton," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 194-203, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:18:y:2011:i:1:p:194-203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967-070X(10)00097-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Parkhurst, G., 2000. "Influence of bus-based park and ride facilities on users' car traffic," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 159-172, April.
    2. Wall, Graham & McDonald, Mike, 2007. "Improving bus service quality and information in Winchester," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 165-179, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Jie & Wang, David Z.W. & Meng, Meng, 2018. "Which service is better on a linear travel corridor: Park & ride or on-demand public bus?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 803-818.
    2. Du, Bo & Wang, David Z.W., 2014. "Continuum modeling of park-and-ride services considering travel time reliability and heterogeneous commuters – A linear complementarity system approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 58-81.
    3. Habibian, Meeghat & Kermanshah, Mohammad, 2013. "Coping with congestion: Understanding the role of simultaneous transportation demand management policies on commuters," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 229-237.
    4. Zhao, Hui & Yan, Xuedong & Gao, Ziyou, 2013. "Transportation serviceability analysis for metropolitan commuting corridors based on modal choice modeling," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 270-284.
    5. Zhao, Xinwei & Chen, Peng & Jiao, Junfeng & Chen, Xiaohong & Bischak, Chris, 2019. "How does ‘park and ride’ perform? An evaluation using longitudinal data," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 15-23.
    6. L. Zhang & Y. P. Wang & J. Sun & B. Yu, 2019. "The sightseeing bus schedule optimization under Park and Ride System in tourist attractions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 273(1), pages 587-605, February.
    7. Yusuke Kono & Kenetsu Uchida & Katia Andrade, 2014. "Economical welfare maximisation analysis: assessing the use of existing Park-and-Ride services," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 839-854, July.
    8. Wang, Yacan & Geng, Kexin & May, Anthony D. & Zhou, Huiyu, 2022. "The impact of traffic demand management policy mix on commuter travel choices," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 74-87.
    9. Mingardo, Giuliano, 2013. "Transport and environmental effects of rail-based Park and Ride: evidence from the Netherlands," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 7-16.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessandro Vitale & Giuseppe Guido & Daniele Rogano, 2016. "A smartphone based DSS platform for assessing transit service attributes," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 315-340, September.
    2. Bakker, P. & Koopmans, C. & Nijkamp, P., 2009. "Appraisal of integrated transport policies," Serie Research Memoranda 0052, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    3. Redman, Lauren & Friman, Margareta & Gärling, Tommy & Hartig, Terry, 2013. "Quality attributes of public transport that attract car users: A research review," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 119-127.
    4. Mills, Gareth & White, Peter, 2018. "Evaluating the long-term impacts of bus-based park and ride," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 536-543.
    5. Celik, Erkan & Aydin, Nezir & Gumus, Alev Taskin, 2014. "A multiattribute customer satisfaction evaluation approach for rail transit network: A real case study for Istanbul, Turkey," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 283-293.
    6. Duncan, Michael, 2019. "Would the replacement of park-and-ride facilities with transit-oriented development reduce vehicle kilometers traveled in an auto-oriented US region?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 293-301.
    7. Zhao, Xinwei & Chen, Peng & Jiao, Junfeng & Chen, Xiaohong & Bischak, Chris, 2019. "How does ‘park and ride’ perform? An evaluation using longitudinal data," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 15-23.
    8. Gordon Waitt & Theresa Harada, 2012. "Driving, Cities and Changing Climates," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(15), pages 3307-3325, November.
    9. Yusuke Kono & Kenetsu Uchida & Katia Andrade, 2014. "Economical welfare maximisation analysis: assessing the use of existing Park-and-Ride services," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 839-854, July.
    10. Santos, Georgina & Behrendt, Hannah & Teytelboym, Alexander, 2010. "Part II: Policy instruments for sustainable road transport," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 46-91.
    11. Gao, Ge & Sun, Huijun & Wu, Jianjun & Liu, Xinmin & Chen, Weiya, 2018. "Park-and-ride service design under a price-based tradable credits scheme in a linear monocentric city," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 1-12.
    12. Sajjakaj Jomnonkwao & Thanapong Champahom & Vatanavongs Ratanavaraha, 2020. "Methodologies for Determining the Service Quality of the Intercity Rail Service Based on Users’ Perceptions and Expectations in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-20, May.
    13. Rodríguez, Andrés & Cordera, Rubén & Alonso, Borja & dell'Olio, Luigi & Benavente, Juan, 2022. "Microsimulation parking choice and search model to assess dynamic pricing scenarios," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 253-269.
    14. Mingardo, Giuliano & van Wee, Bert & Rye, Tom, 2015. "Urban parking policy in Europe: A conceptualization of past and possible future trends," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 268-281.
    15. Fadyushin Alexey & Zakharov Dmitrii, 2020. "Influence of the Parameters of the Bus Lane and the Bus Stop on the Delays of Private and Public Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.
    16. Luo, Qingyu & Bing, Xue & Jia, Hongfei & Song, Jinge, 2022. "An incentive subsidy mechanism for bus lines based on service level," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 1-13.
    17. Dijk, Marc & Montalvo, Carlos, 2011. "Policy frames of Park-and-Ride in Europe," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 1106-1119.
    18. Viacheslav Morozov & Sergei Iarkov, 2021. "Formation of the Traffic Flow Rate under the Influence of Traffic Flow Concentration in Time at Controlled Intersections in Tyumen, Russian Federation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-21, July.
    19. Marc Dijk & Graham Parkhurst, 2014. "Understanding the mobility-transformative qualities of urban park and ride polices in the UK and the Netherlands," International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(3/4), pages 246-270.
    20. Duy Q. Nguyen-Phuoc & William Young & Graham Currie & Chris Gruyter, 2020. "Traffic congestion relief associated with public transport: state-of-the-art," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 455-481, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:18:y:2011:i:1:p:194-203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.