IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v129y2022icp90-104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A qualitative exploration of factors influencing women's intention to use shared taxis: A study on the characteristics of urban commuting behavior in Iran

Author

Listed:
  • Firoozi Yeganeh, Sayna
  • Khademi, Navid
  • Farahani, Hojatollah
  • Besharat, Mohammad Ali

Abstract

Compared with men, women have different travel behavior. Various factors may affect women's transportation-related decisions, especially in a developing country like Iran with a patriarchal culture. Moreover, distinct characteristics of some transportation systems in Iran, such as rounding and fixed-route shared taxis, whose properties are different from the conventional taxis in western countries, may lead to further differences in Iranian women's transportation mode choice behavior. Studies investigating women's travel behavior and transportation mode choice have often focused on quantitative modeling and mainly highlight the gender differences rather than identifying the underlying factors contributing to women's different behavior. To fulfill this gap, this study attempts to explore the factors and motivations affecting women's shared mobility choices, specifically, shared taxis, in a less developed country with specific socio-cultural structures. Such exploratory research may necessitate a qualitative study that can clarify the cause of the behaviors. Thus, in this study, the conventional content analysis with an inductive approach, in both the latent and manifest levels, was performed. In-depth semi-structured interviews with 15 students and working women living in Tehran (the capital of Iran) were conducted. According to the latent content analysis results, a complex set of factors contributes to women's intention to use shared taxis that can be classified into seven main themes with several sub-themes. The study showed that the fear of abuse and imaginary harassment strongly influence women's transportation-related decisions. Also, women may face direct and indirect restrictions from the family and society. The gender social halo and family norms, more prevalent in traditional and developing societies, may also challenge women's everyday mobility. Moreover, the impact of individual values and beliefs, as well as personality factors on women's travel behavior, cannot be ignored. Indirect social learning is another important factor identified as influential in using shared taxis. Manifest content analysis also resulted in three main categories, including environment-specific factors, trip-vehicle-specific factors, and individual-specific factors. The study attempted to provide more profound insight into women's transportation-related behaviors for policymakers in order to reconsider transportation planning. Also, findings highlighted the role of collaborative efforts of sociologists, psychologists, and transportation planners in tackling women's transportation-related issues in less developed countries with different socio-cultural norms from Western societies.

Suggested Citation

  • Firoozi Yeganeh, Sayna & Khademi, Navid & Farahani, Hojatollah & Besharat, Mohammad Ali, 2022. "A qualitative exploration of factors influencing women's intention to use shared taxis: A study on the characteristics of urban commuting behavior in Iran," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 90-104.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:129:y:2022:i:c:p:90-104
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.10.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X22002803
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.10.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jelena Simićević & Nada Milosavljević & Vladimir Djoric, 2016. "Gender differences in travel behaviour and willingness to adopt sustainable behaviour," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(5), pages 527-537, July.
    2. Nasrin, Sharmin & Bunker, Jonathan, 2021. "Analyzing significant variables for choosing different modes by female travelers," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 312-329.
    3. Simons, Dorien & Clarys, Peter & De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse & de Geus, Bas & Vandelanotte, Corneel & Deforche, Benedicte, 2014. "Why do young adults choose different transport modes? A focus group study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 151-159.
    4. Mohammad Ali Arman & Navid Khademi & Matthieu de Lapparent, 2018. "Women’s mode and trip structure choices in daily activity-travel: a developing country perspective," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(8), pages 845-877, November.
    5. Sherwin, Henrietta & Chatterjee, Kiron & Jain, Juliet, 2014. "An exploration of the importance of social influence in the decision to start bicycling in England," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 32-45.
    6. Hagen, Jonas Xaver & Pardo, CarlosFelipe & Valente, Johanna Burbano, 2016. "Motivations for motorcycle use for Urban travel in Latin America: A qualitative study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 93-104.
    7. Steg, Linda, 2005. "Car use: lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 39(2-3), pages 147-162.
    8. Muhammad Adeel & Anthony G. O. Yeh & Feng Zhang, 2017. "Gender inequality in mobility and mode choice in Pakistan," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 1519-1534, November.
    9. Rico Krueger & Akshay Vij & Taha H. Rashidi, 2018. "Normative beliefs and modality styles: a latent class and latent variable model of travel behaviour," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 789-825, May.
    10. Wei-Shiuen Ng & Ashley Acker, 2018. "Understanding Urban Travel Behaviour by Gender for Efficient and Equitable Transport Policies," International Transport Forum Discussion Papers 2018/01, OECD Publishing.
    11. Jun Guan Neoh & Maxwell Chipulu & Alasdair Marshall, 2017. "What encourages people to carpool? An evaluation of factors with meta-analysis," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 423-447, March.
    12. Nelson, John D. & Wright, Steve & Masson, Brian & Ambrosino, Giorgio & Naniopoulos, Aristotelis, 2010. "Recent developments in Flexible Transport Services," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 243-248.
    13. Kash, Gwen, 2020. "Transportation professionals' visions of transit sexual assault: The problem of deproblematizing beliefs," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 200-216.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohammadhossein Abbasi & Amir Reza Mamdoohi & Grzegorz Sierpiński & Francesco Ciari, 2023. "Usage Intention of Shared Autonomous Vehicles with Dynamic Ride Sharing on Long-Distance Trips," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nasrin, Sharmin & Bunker, Jonathan, 2024. "Gender equality through sustainable transport policy," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 59-79.
    2. Aldred, Rachel & Woodcock, James, 2015. "Reframing safety: An analysis of perceptions of cycle safety clothing," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 103-112.
    3. Borker, Girija, 2024. "Understanding the constraints to women’s use of urban public transport in developing countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    4. Saxena, Aditya & Gupta, Vallary, 2023. "Carpooling: Who is closest to adopting it? An investigation into the potential car-poolers among private vehicle users: A case of a developing country, India," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 11-20.
    5. Guzman, Luis A. & Arellana, Julian & Alvarez, Vilma, 2020. "Confronting congestion in urban areas: Developing Sustainable Mobility Plans for public and private organizations in Bogotá," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 321-335.
    6. Hauslbauer, Andrea L. & Schade, Jens & Petzoldt, Tibor, 2022. "The identification of mobility types on a national level," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 289-298.
    7. Muhammad Ashraf Javid & Nazam Ali & Tiziana Campisi & Giovanni Tesoriere & Krisada Chaiyasarn, 2022. "Influence of Social Constraints, Mobility Incentives, and Restrictions on Commuters’ Behavioral Intentions and Moral Obligation towards the Metro-Bus Service in Lahore," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, February.
    8. Katarzyna Nosal Hoy & Sabina Puławska-Obiedowska, 2021. "The Travel Behaviour of Polish Women and Adaptation of Transport Systems to Their Needs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-27, March.
    9. Qihao Liu & Yuzheng Liu & Chia-Lin Chen & Enrica Papa & Yantao Ling & Mengqiu Cao, 2023. "Is It Possible to Compete With Car Use? How Buses Can Facilitate Sustainable Transport," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 69-83.
    10. Downward, Paul & Rasciute, Simona, 2015. "Assessing the impact of the National Cycle Network and physical activity lifestyle on cycling behaviour in England," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 425-437.
    11. Schwanen, Tim, 2020. "Towards decolonial human subjects in research on transport," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    12. Toşa, Cristian & Sato, Hitomi & Morikawa, Takayuki & Miwa, Tomio, 2018. "Commuting behavior in emerging urban areas: Findings of a revealed-preferences and stated-intentions survey in Cluj-Napoca, Romania," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 78-93.
    13. Mattauch, Linus & Hepburn, Cameron & Stern, Nicholas, 2018. "Pigou pushes preferences: decarbonisation and endogenous values," INET Oxford Working Papers 2018-16, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    14. Lois, David & López-Sáez, Mercedes, 2009. "The relationship between instrumental, symbolic and affective factors as predictors of car use: A structural equation modeling approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 43(9-10), pages 790-799, November.
    15. Mathieu Lambotte & Sandrine Mathy & Anna Risch & Carole Treibich, 2022. "Spreading active transportation: peer effects and key players in the workplace," Post-Print hal-03702684, HAL.
    16. He, Mingwei & He, Chengfeng & Shi, Zhuangbin & He, Min, 2022. "Spatiotemporal heterogeneous effects of socio-demographic and built environment on private car usage: An empirical study of Kunming, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    17. Jun Guan Neoh & Maxwell Chipulu & Alasdair Marshall, 2017. "What encourages people to carpool? An evaluation of factors with meta-analysis," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 423-447, March.
    18. Fabio Antonialli & Rodrigo Gandia & Joel Sugano & Isabelle Nicolaï & Arthur Neto, 2019. "Business Platforms For Autonomous Vehicles Within Urban Mobility," Post-Print halshs-03687640, HAL.
    19. Synek, Stefan & Koenigstorfer, Joerg, 2018. "Exploring adoption determinants of tax-subsidized company-leasing bicycles from the perspective of German employers and employees," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 238-260.
    20. Allen, Jaime & Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Ortúzar, Juan de Dios, 2019. "On evasion behaviour in public transport: Dissatisfaction or contagion?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 626-651.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:129:y:2022:i:c:p:90-104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.