Author
Listed:
- Han, Yu
- Wu, Jiarui
- Ding, Fan
- Li, Zhibin
- Liu, Pan
- Leclercq, Ludovic
Abstract
Capacity drop, a traffic phenomenon indicating that the discharge flow from a queue is lower than the pre-queue flow, is commonly observed at freeway bottlenecks. In the literature, the majority of empirical studies on capacity drop rely on aggregated traffic flow data. To fully understand the mechanism behind capacity drop, it is essential to analyze trajectory data, which captures the microscopic behavior of individual vehicles. However, the availability of high-quality trajectory data covering both sufficient spatial and temporal scope is limited. Consequently, existing theories and mechanisms to explain capacity drop from the perspective of vehicle behavior are predominantly analytical, lacking direct evidence to validate their impacts on contributing to capacity drop. This paper fills this gap by conducting a comprehensive empirical analysis of capacity drop using high-resolution trajectory data extracted from videos recorded by unmanned aerial vehicles. The empirical analysis examines the relative effects of various capacity drop mechanisms and reveals the following findings: (i) The late responses of hesitant vehicles during the acceleration process significantly contribute to capacity drop; (ii) the impact of response delay on queue discharge rate is more pronounced at lower congestion speeds; (iii) response delays primarily result from deceleration during car-following, followed by lane changes, with their combined effect having a more pronounced triggering impact. These findings are subsequently validated using data collected from another site. The findings presented in this paper are valuable for developing more accurate microscopic traffic simulation models and designing more effective traffic management and control strategies.
Suggested Citation
Han, Yu & Wu, Jiarui & Ding, Fan & Li, Zhibin & Liu, Pan & Leclercq, Ludovic, 2025.
"Capacity drop at active bottlenecks: An empirical study based on trajectory data,"
Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:transb:v:196:y:2025:i:c:s0191261525000670
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2025.103218
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:196:y:2025:i:c:s0191261525000670. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.