IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v192y2025ics0191261524002704.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investment and financing of roadway digital infrastructure for automated driving

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmadian, Amir
  • Bahrami, Sina
  • Nourinejad, Mehdi
  • Yin, Yafeng

Abstract

Connected automated vehicles (CAVs) are equipped with sensors, enabling them to scan and analyze their surrounding environment. This capability empowers CAVs to make informed and efficient decisions regarding their motion; however, the limited spatial range and resolution of these sensors present challenges for achieving full autonomy. Cooperative sensing through vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) and vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) communications offers an alternative approach to enrich CAVs’ environmental understanding. This study explores the optimal investment policy for vehicular connectivity and road-side sensor deployment under varying traffic flow conditions. It also extends the self-financing theorem to the sensor equipped roads and investigates whether an optimal toll can cover both the construction costs and the costs of equipping roads with sensing components. The stylized model of CAV mobility considers the interplay between stationary sensors installed road-side as a part of the infrastructure and mobile sensors of CAVs. Results indicate that under constrained budgets and low traffic flow, investing in infrastructure improvement is preferred. However, as traffic flow increases, prioritizing connectivity and data sharing among CAVs becomes more lucrative. Notably, in high traffic flow, a shift back to investing in stationary sensors may occur, depending on system settings. The findings provide insights into budget allocation to enhance CAV performance, advancing the development of efficient and safe automated driving systems. The analyses on the self-financing theorem also show that the optimal user tolls do not cover the cost of constructing digital infrastructure. However, if social planners consider the safety benefits of sensor equipped roads, the construction of digital infrastructure can be covered by the optimal user tolls. In addition, the revenue from optimal user tolls can cover the cost of equipping existing roads with sensors if their flow-capacity ratio is greater than a certain threshold.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmadian, Amir & Bahrami, Sina & Nourinejad, Mehdi & Yin, Yafeng, 2025. "Investment and financing of roadway digital infrastructure for automated driving," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:192:y:2025:i:c:s0191261524002704
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2024.103146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261524002704
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2024.103146?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fagnant, Daniel J. & Kockelman, Kara, 2015. "Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 167-181.
    2. Yang, Hai & Meng, Qiang, 2000. "Highway pricing and capacity choice in a road network under a build-operate-transfer scheme," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 207-222, April.
    3. Li, Xiaopeng, 2022. "Trade-off between safety, mobility and stability in automated vehicle following control: An analytical method," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1-18.
    4. Pavlos Tafidis & Haneen Farah & Tom Brijs & Ali Pirdavani, 2022. "Safety implications of higher levels of automated vehicles: a scoping review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 245-267, March.
    5. Nourinejad, Mehdi & Bahrami, Sina & Yin, Yafeng, 2023. "Optimal investment in driving automation: Individual vs. cooperative sensing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Zhengtian & Yin, Yafeng & Zha, Liteng, 2017. "Optimal parking provision for ride-sourcing services," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 559-578.
    2. Tscharaktschiew, Stefan & Reimann, Felix, 2021. "On employer-paid parking and parking (cash-out) policy: A formal synthesis of different perspectives," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 499-516.
    3. Yang, Hai & Huang, Hai-Jun, 2004. "The multi-class, multi-criteria traffic network equilibrium and systems optimum problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Kolarova, Viktoriya & Steck, Felix & Bahamonde-Birke, Francisco J., 2019. "Assessing the effect of autonomous driving on value of travel time savings: A comparison between current and future preferences," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 155-169.
    5. Pons-Prats, Jordi & Živojinović, Tanja & Kuljanin, Jovana, 2022. "On the understanding of the current status of urban air mobility development and its future prospects: Commuting in a flying vehicle as a new paradigm," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    6. Kang, Chao-Chung & Feng, Cheng-Min & Kuo, Chiu-Yen, 2012. "Comparison of royalty methods for build–operate–transfer projects from a negotiation perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 830-842.
    7. Gurumurthy, Krishna Murthy & Kockelman, Kara M., 2021. "Impacts of shared automated vehicles on airport access and operations, with opportunities for revenue recovery: Case Study of Austin, Texas," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    8. Nordhoff, Sina & Stapel, Jork & van Arem, Bart & Happee, Riender, 2020. "Passenger opinions of the perceived safety and interaction with automated shuttles: A test ride study with ‘hidden’ safety steward," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 508-524.
    9. Wang, Xianing & Lu, Linjun & Zhang, Zhan & Wang, Ying & Li, Haoming, 2025. "Introducing the vehicle-infrastructure cooperative control system by quantifying the benefits for the scenario of signalized intersections," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    10. Kassens-Noor, Eva & Cai, Meng & Kotval-Karamchandani, Zeenat & Decaminada, Travis, 2021. "Autonomous vehicles and mobility for people with special needs," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 385-397.
    11. Andreas Brenck & Thorsten Beckers & Maria Heinrich & Christian von Hirschhausen, 2005. "Public-private partnerships in new EU member countries of Central and Eastern Europe: An economic analysis with case studies from the highway sector," EIB Papers 10/2005, European Investment Bank, Economics Department.
    12. Lavoie, Brenden & Ong, Felita & Habib, Khandker Nurul, 2024. "Relax on the way to work or work on the way to relax? Influences of vehicle interior on travel time perceptions in autonomous vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    13. Zhang, Fang & Lu, Jian & Hu, Xiaojian & Meng, Qiang, 2023. "Integrated deployment of dedicated lane and roadside unit considering uncertain road capacity under the mixed-autonomy traffic environment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    14. Feng, Zhuo & Song, Jinbo & Yang, Xiaoxing & Guo, Ran, 2023. "Contractual flexibility, firm effort, and subsidy design: A comparison of PPP project contracts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(1), pages 484-496.
    15. Li, Dun & Huang, Youlin & Qian, Lixian, 2022. "Potential adoption of robotaxi service: The roles of perceived benefits to multiple stakeholders and environmental awareness," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 120-135.
    16. Kalra, Nidhi & Paddock, Susan M., 2016. "Driving to safety: How many miles of driving would it take to demonstrate autonomous vehicle reliability?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 182-193.
    17. Mao, Wei & Shepherd, Simon & Harrison, Gillian & Xu, Meng, 2024. "Autonomous vehicle market development in Beijing: A system dynamics approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    18. Gruber, Mario, 2020. "An evolutionary perspective on adoption-diffusion theory," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 535-541.
    19. Saeed, Tariq Usman & Burris, Mark W. & Labi, Samuel & Sinha, Kumares C., 2020. "An empirical discourse on forecasting the use of autonomous vehicles using consumers’ preferences," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    20. Liu, Peng & Xu, Zhigang & Zhao, Xiangmo, 2019. "Road tests of self-driving vehicles: Affective and cognitive pathways in acceptance formation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 354-369.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:192:y:2025:i:c:s0191261524002704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.