IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v205y2026ics0965856426000273.html

A prototype analysis of trust in autonomous vehicles (AVs)

Author

Listed:
  • Kiffin-Petersen, Sandra
  • Purchase, Sharon
  • Smith, Brett
  • Olaru, Doina

Abstract

Trust in autonomous vehicles (AVs) plays a critical role in shaping public policy and fostering their public acceptance. As AV technology advances, measuring trust becomes increasingly important for informing government strategies. Trials currently undertaken in North America, Europe and Asia highlight the need for urban planning and transport policy departments to actively enhance public trust in AVs. This study applies prototype analysis, a technique widely used in psychology, though yet to become part of the standard toolkit in transport research, to investigate the features of trust in AVs. Prototype analysis is a novel ground-up methodology to investigate the cognitive structure of an abstract concept, here, trust in AVs. Rather than transferring human–human trust measures to trust in AVs, this study elicits context-specific constructs that may inform scale development processes through a series of five studies undertaken in Australia: feature generation, ranking/rating, best-worst, reaction time, and vignette analysis. A key outcome is a set of policy recommendations for how government departments can implement practices that can build trust in this future technology, ensuring public confidence keeps pace with technological advancements in autonomous transport.

Suggested Citation

  • Kiffin-Petersen, Sandra & Purchase, Sharon & Smith, Brett & Olaru, Doina, 2026. "A prototype analysis of trust in autonomous vehicles (AVs)," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:205:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426000273
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2026.104886
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856426000273
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2026.104886?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wu, Min & Wang, Nanxi & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2023. "Can autonomy level and anthropomorphic characteristics affect public acceptance and trust towards shared autonomous vehicles?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    2. Jan C Zoellick & Adelheid Kuhlmey & Liane Schenk & Daniel Schindel & Stefan Blüher, 2019. "Assessing acceptance of electric automated vehicles after exposure in a realistic traffic environment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-23, May.
    3. Liu, Peng & Xu, Zhigang & Zhao, Xiangmo, 2019. "Road tests of self-driving vehicles: Affective and cognitive pathways in acceptance formation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 354-369.
    4. Fagnant, Daniel J. & Kockelman, Kara, 2015. "Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 167-181.
    5. Saleh Afroogh & Ali Akbari & Emmie Malone & Mohammadali Kargar & Hananeh Alambeigi, 2024. "Trust in AI: progress, challenges, and future directions," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-30, December.
    6. Zhang, Qiyuan & Wallbridge, Christopher D. & Jones, Dylan M. & Morgan, Phillip L., 2024. "Public perception of autonomous vehicle capability determines judgment of blame and trust in road traffic accidents," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    7. Sarah Dennis & Alexander Paz & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2021. "Perceptions and Attitudes Towards the Deployment of Autonomous and Connected Vehicles: Insights from Las Vegas, Nevada," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3-4), pages 75-95, October.
    8. Schepis, Daniel & Purchase, Sharon & Olaru, Doina & Smith, Brett & Ellis, Nick, 2023. "How governments influence autonomous vehicle (AV) innovation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    9. Acheampong, Ransford A. & Legacy, Crystal & Kingston, Richard & Stone, John, 2023. "Imagining urban mobility futures in the era of autonomous vehicles—insights from participatory visioning and multi-criteria appraisal in the UK and Australia," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 193-208.
    10. Kenesei, Zsófia & Ásványi, Katalin & Kökény, László & Jászberényi, Melinda & Miskolczi, Márk & Gyulavári, Tamás & Syahrivar, Jhanghiz, 2022. "Trust and perceived risk: How different manifestations affect the adoption of autonomous vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 379-393.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Xiang & Sun, Haojie & Pei, Xiaoyang & Guan, Linghui & Wang, Zihao, 2024. "Evolution of technology investment and development of robotaxi services," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    2. Nordhoff, Sina & Stapel, Jork & van Arem, Bart & Happee, Riender, 2020. "Passenger opinions of the perceived safety and interaction with automated shuttles: A test ride study with ‘hidden’ safety steward," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 508-524.
    3. Yoganathan, Vignesh & Osburg, Victoria-Sophie, 2024. "Heterogenous evaluations of autonomous vehicle services: An extended theoretical framework and empirical evidence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    4. Márta Volosin & Martin Kálnay & Ádám Bánffi & Natália Nyeső & Gabriella Viktória Molnár & Zsolt Palatinus & Tamás Martos, 2024. "The leading role of personality in concerns about autonomous vehicles," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(6), pages 1-23, June.
    5. Zhang, Qiyuan & Marcinkiewicz, Victoria & Bowen, Louise & Kozlowski, Theodor & Inatani, Tatsuhiko & Ueda, Yoshiyuki & Katsuno, Hirofumi & Asada, Minoru & Morgan, Phillip L., 2026. "Should AI be allowed to break the law? Public acceptance and tolerance of discretionary actions performed by autonomous vehicles in response to situations varying by degree of acuteness," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    6. Xu, Ningzhe & Liu, Jun & Fu, Xing & Shi, Yangming & Jones, Steven, 2025. "Understanding first responders’ familiarity and attitudes toward connected and automated vehicles (CAVs): insights from latent class analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    7. Duan, Xu & Si, Hongyun & Xiang, Pengcheng, 2025. "Technology into reality: Disentangling the challenges of shared autonomous electric vehicles implementation from stakeholder perspectives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 316(C).
    8. Pettigrew, Simone & Booth, Leon & Farrar, Victoria & Brown, Julie & Karl, Charles & Godic, Branislava & Vidanaarachchi, Rajith & Thompson, Jason, 2024. "Public support for proposed government policies to optimise the social benefits of autonomous vehicles," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 264-270.
    9. Zhao, Xiaoyun & Susilo, Yusak O. & Pernestål, Anna, 2022. "The dynamic and long-term changes of automated bus service adoption," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 450-463.
    10. Ho, Shirley S. & Cheung, Justin C., 2024. "Trust in artificial intelligence, trust in engineers, and news media: Factors shaping public perceptions of autonomous drones through UTAUT2," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    11. Yu, Jiangbo, 2025. "Preparing for an agentic era of human-machine transportation systems: Opportunities, challenges, and policy recommendations," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 78-97.
    12. Greifenstein, Marvin & Nordhoff, Sina & Wang, Xinyi & Atluri, Bhuvan, 2026. "Riding into the future: What drives the use of robotaxis in San Francisco?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    13. Xing, Yingying & Li, Lun & Sheng, Xiaolu & Zhou, Huiyu & Han, Xiao, 2025. "Understanding public perceptions of autonomous vehicles: A structural model to urban-rural differences and psychological factors," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 70-84.
    14. Wandelt, Sebastian & Zhang, Anming & Antoniou, Constantinos & Budd, Lucy & Castro-Nuno, Mercedes & Ding, Yida & Eliasson, Jonas & Goessling, Stefan & He, Sylvia Y. & Ison, Stephen & Jiang, Changmin & , 2025. "The Hitchhiker’s Guide to challenges in transport policy research: Towards ANSWERing questions regarding life, mobility, and everything," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    15. Namgung, Hyewon & Chikaraishi, Makoto & Fujiwara, Akimasa, 2023. "Influence of real and video-based experiences on stated acceptance of connected public transportation and autonomous vehicles in a transit mall: A hybrid choice modeling approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    16. Wu, Yuanyuan & Yu, Han & Yan, Zhang & Xu, Hong, 2026. "Dissociating ethical dilemma preferences and actions in autonomous driving by survey and driving experiment," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    17. Liu, Peng, 2020. "Positive, negative, ambivalent, or indifferent? Exploring the structure of public attitudes toward self-driving vehicles on public roads," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 27-38.
    18. Xu, Zhengtian & Yin, Yafeng & Zha, Liteng, 2017. "Optimal parking provision for ride-sourcing services," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 559-578.
    19. Tscharaktschiew, Stefan & Reimann, Felix, 2021. "On employer-paid parking and parking (cash-out) policy: A formal synthesis of different perspectives," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 499-516.
    20. Kolarova, Viktoriya & Steck, Felix & Bahamonde-Birke, Francisco J., 2019. "Assessing the effect of autonomous driving on value of travel time savings: A comparison between current and future preferences," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 155-169.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:205:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426000273. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.