Author
Listed:
- Greifenstein, Marvin
- Nordhoff, Sina
- Wang, Xinyi
- Atluri, Bhuvan
Abstract
Robotaxis are now available for consumer service in San Francisco. Yet, a notable research gap remains in examining behavioural intentions and use behaviour of robotaxis in areas where these services are commercially available. Using survey data collected from San Francisco residents (n = 517), this paper examines factors that influence individuals’ behavioural intentions and actual use of robotaxis in California. Confirmatory factor analysis was applied to test the measurement model, while partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) was used to test the hypothesized structural path relationships between the predictors, behavioural intention and actual use of robotaxis. Additionally, multi-group analysis allowed for the examination of differences between groups varying in socio-demographic factors (e.g., gender, age, income) and mobility behaviour (e.g., use of robotaxis, ride-hailing, private vehicle). Almost half of the respondents were undecided about robotaxis being good value for money, with the neutral response rate for this question being the highest among all surveyed (43 %). Notably, respondents showed the lowest level of agreement with the statement on the importance of robotaxis among people important to them (23 % agreement). This suggests that, even in an innovation hub like San Francisco, social acceptance may lag behind individual interest and policy enthusiasm. Our study further shows that intention to use robotaxis significantly affects actual use behaviour for those having already taken robotaxi rides while personal innovativeness, hedonic motivation and social influence are the strongest predictors of behavioural intention to use. Overall, robotaxis seem to already be integrating into the urban landscape of San Francisco residents.
Suggested Citation
Greifenstein, Marvin & Nordhoff, Sina & Wang, Xinyi & Atluri, Bhuvan, 2026.
"Riding into the future: What drives the use of robotaxis in San Francisco?,"
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:transa:v:203:y:2026:i:c:s0965856425003969
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104763
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:203:y:2026:i:c:s0965856425003969. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.