IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v133y2020icp337-352.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling and forecasting daily non-work/school activity patterns in an activity-based model using skeleton schedule constraints

Author

Listed:
  • Dianat, Leila
  • Habib, Khandker Nurul
  • Miller, Eric J.

Abstract

A dynamic, gap-based activity scheduling model is developed for predicting out-of-home non-work/school (NWS) episodes over a day. In the developed model, work/school, and night sleep are assumed to be pre-determined, thereby providing a daily “skeleton schedule”. NWS episodes are then simultaneously generated and scheduled in the available gaps as a joint activity type and destination choice, followed by a continuous time expenditure choice. The model is built on a subset of the Transportation Tomorrow Survey (TTS) collected in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA) in 2001. The developed model is validated on another sample from the TTS 2001 and is also applied to forecast individuals’ schedules for the years 2006 and 2011, for which observed TTS data are also available. This study, which is rarely conducted in the literature, examines the model’s capability to replicate the base year schedule and predict the activity patterns of the future years, which is the ultimate purpose of any travel demand model. Simulation outcomes of the three years follow similar trends to each other. Replication of the base year’s schedule is more accurate than the future years; however, there are no significant changes in the accuracy of the outcomes of the model’s application on all the three years.

Suggested Citation

  • Dianat, Leila & Habib, Khandker Nurul & Miller, Eric J., 2020. "Modeling and forecasting daily non-work/school activity patterns in an activity-based model using skeleton schedule constraints," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 337-352.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:133:y:2020:i:c:p:337-352
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2020.01.017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856418311583
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2020.01.017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yoram Shiftan & Moshe Ben-Akiva, 2011. "A practical policy-sensitive, activity-based, travel-demand model," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 47(3), pages 517-541, December.
    2. Arentze, Theo A. & Timmermans, Harry J. P., 2004. "A learning-based transportation oriented simulation system," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 613-633, August.
    3. Rajesh Paleti & Peter Vovsha & Gaurav Vyas & Rebekah Anderson & Gregory Giaimo, 2017. "Activity sequencing, location, and formation of individual non-mandatory tours: application to the activity-based models for Columbus, Cincinnati, and Cleveland, OH," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 615-640, May.
    4. Khandker Habib, 2011. "A random utility maximization (RUM) based dynamic activity scheduling model: Application in weekend activity scheduling," Transportation, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 123-151, January.
    5. Bhat, Chandra R., 2008. "The multiple discrete-continuous extreme value (MDCEV) model: Role of utility function parameters, identification considerations, and model extensions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 274-303, March.
    6. Roorda, Matthew J. & Miller, Eric J. & Habib, Khandker M.N., 2008. "Validation of TASHA: A 24-h activity scheduling microsimulation model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 360-375, February.
    7. Ram Pendyala & Toshiyuki Yamamoto & Ryuichi Kitamura, 2002. "On the formulation of time-space prisms to model constraints on personal activity-travel engagement," Transportation, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 73-94, February.
    8. Sean Doherty & Eric Miller, 2000. "A computerized household activity scheduling survey," Transportation, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 75-97, February.
    9. Fabian Märki & David Charypar & Kay Axhausen, 2014. "Agent-based model for continuous activity planning with an open planning horizon," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 905-922, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kaili Wang & Sanjana Hossain & Khandker Nurul Habib, 2022. "A hybrid data fusion methodology for household travel surveys to reduce proxy biases and under-representation of specific sub-group of population," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(6), pages 1801-1836, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leila Dianat & Khandker Nurul Habib & Eric J. Miller, 2020. "Investigating the influence of assigning a higher priority to scheduling work and school activities in the activity-based models on the simulated travel/activity patterns," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 2109-2132, October.
    2. Yasmin, Farhana & Morency, Catherine & Roorda, Matthew J., 2015. "Assessment of spatial transferability of an activity-based model, TASHA," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 200-213.
    3. Yoon, Seo Youn & Ravulaparthy, Srinath K. & Goulias, Konstadinos G., 2014. "Dynamic diurnal social taxonomy of urban environments using data from a geocoded time use activity-travel diary and point-based business establishment inventory," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 3-17.
    4. Konstadinos G. Goulias & Ram M. Pendyala, 2014. "Choice context," Chapters, in: Stephane Hess & Andrew Daly (ed.), Handbook of Choice Modelling, chapter 5, pages 101-130, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Khandker Habib, 2011. "A random utility maximization (RUM) based dynamic activity scheduling model: Application in weekend activity scheduling," Transportation, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 123-151, January.
    6. Guo, Liya & Huang, Shan & Sadek, Adel W., 2013. "A novel agent-based transportation model of a university campus with application to quantifying the environmental cost of parking search," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 86-104.
    7. Ozonder, Gozde & Miller, Eric J., 2021. "Longitudinal investigation of skeletal activity episode timing decisions – A copula approach," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    8. André de Palma & Nathalie Picard & Robin Lindsey, 2021. "Activity and Transportation Decisions within Households," THEMA Working Papers 2021-18, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    9. Sheila Ferrer & Tomás Ruiz, 2017. "Comparison on travel scheduling between driving and walking trips by habitual car users," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 27-48, January.
    10. Dane, Gamze & Arentze, Theo A. & Timmermans, Harry J.P. & Ettema, Dick, 2014. "Simultaneous modeling of individuals’ duration and expenditure decisions in out-of-home leisure activities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 93-103.
    11. Saxena, Shobhit & Pinjari, Abdul Rawoof & Paleti, Rajesh, 2022. "A multiple discrete-continuous extreme value model with ordered preferences (MDCEV-OP): Modelling framework for episode-level activity participation and time-use analysis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 259-283.
    12. Chandra Bhat & Konstadinos Goulias & Ram Pendyala & Rajesh Paleti & Raghuprasad Sidharthan & Laura Schmitt & Hsi-Hwa Hu, 2013. "A household-level activity pattern generation model with an application for Southern California," Transportation, Springer, vol. 40(5), pages 1063-1086, September.
    13. Linda Nijland & Theo Arentze & Harry Timmermans, 2013. "Representing and estimating interactions between activities in a need-based model of activity generation," Transportation, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 413-430, February.
    14. Bhat, Chandra & Lockwood, Allison, 2004. "On distinguishing between physically active and physically passive episodes and between travel and activity episodes: an analysis of weekend recreational participation in the San Francisco Bay area," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 573-592, October.
    15. Vo, Khoa D. & Lam, William H.K. & Chen, Anthony & Shao, Hu, 2020. "A household optimum utility approach for modeling joint activity-travel choices in congested road networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 93-125.
    16. Sarah Salem & Khandker M. Nurul Habib, 2019. "Use of repeated cross-sectional travel surveys for developing meta models of activity-travel scheduling processes," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 395-423, April.
    17. Liu, Peng & Liao, Feixiong & Tian, Qiong & Huang, Hai-Jun & Timmermans, Harry, 2020. "Day-to-day needs-based activity-travel dynamics and equilibria in multi-state supernetworks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 208-227.
    18. Hasnine, Md Sami & Habib, Khandker Nurul, 2018. "What about the dynamics in daily travel mode choices? A dynamic discrete choice approach for tour-based mode choice modelling," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 70-80.
    19. Ram Pendyala & Chandra Bhat, 2004. "An Exploration of the Relationship between Timing and Duration of Maintenance Activities," Transportation, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 429-456, November.
    20. Linda Nijland & Theo Arentze & Harry Timmermans, 2012. "Incorporating planned activities and events in a dynamic multi-day activity agenda generator," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 791-806, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:133:y:2020:i:c:p:337-352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.