Author
Abstract
This article examines the anticipated FM switch-off in Flanders (Belgium) as a case study to analyse the economic, social, and political interests shaping the transition to digital radio. Drawing on 32 semi-structured interviews with broadcasters, policymakers and other stakeholders, the study highlights how the costs and benefits of digitisation are unevenly distributed across different levels of the radio ecosystem. At the micro level, audiences face financial and practical barriers to adopting DAB+, with limited incentives to replace still-functioning FM devices. At the mezzo level, broadcasters express concern about declining audience reach, advertising revenues, and increased competition from international streaming services, while incumbents resist disruption to their entrenched market positions. At the macro level, digitisation promises benefits such as greater diversity and improved energy efficiency, but also raises risks of digital exclusion, particularly for socioeconomically disadvantaged and older listeners. The analysis demonstrates that a rapid FM switch-off could destabilize the broadcasting market and undermine universal access to radio services. The study concludes that a successful transition requires a negotiated policy process in which governments balance private and public interests, short- and long-term costs, and competing technological pathways. Rather than privileging DAB+ as the dominant successor to FM, policymakers should adopt a platform-neutral and future-proof regulatory framework that recognises the dynamic and uncertain nature of technological development.
Suggested Citation
Evens, Tom, 2026.
"The FM radio switch-off and the need for sustainable and inclusive digital radio policy,"
Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(2).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:telpol:v:50:y:2026:i:2:s0308596125002137
DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103116
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:50:y:2026:i:2:s0308596125002137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30471/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.