IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v84y2026ics0160791x25002556.html

The more human-like the better? Effect of anthropomorphic level on customer intention to participate in AI service recovery

Author

Listed:
  • Song, Mengmeng
  • Jiang, Wenjing
  • Xing, Xinyu
  • Mou, Jian
  • Duan, Yucong

Abstract

The increasing application of artificial intelligence (AI) technology in the service industry has required more studies on service failures caused by intelligent customer service and its repair. In this study, the influence of anthropomorphism on customers’ intention to participate in service recovery cooperation is examined by effectively controlling the appearance, expression, and language style of intelligent customer service anthropomorphism. Through three experiments, the role of the intelligent customer service anthropomorphic level on customers intention to participate in service recovery cooperation is revealed, as well as two mediating pathways (shifting emotion and aversion) and the boundary (time pressure) of the anthropomorphic level. These findings contribute toward the understanding of AI-assisted services, and they provide insights into the application of anthropomorphic design in the service industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Song, Mengmeng & Jiang, Wenjing & Xing, Xinyu & Mou, Jian & Duan, Yucong, 2026. "The more human-like the better? Effect of anthropomorphic level on customer intention to participate in AI service recovery," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:84:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x25002556
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25002556
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103065?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:84:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x25002556. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.