IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v219y2025ics0040162525003300.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The endorsement effectiveness of virtual influencers in nonprofit fundraising: The role of appearance and voice pitch

Author

Listed:
  • Song, Jiehang
  • Zheng, Chundong
  • Lv, Xiarong
  • Font, Xavier

Abstract

Virtual influencer (VI) endorsement of brands and products is growing but remains underexplored in the context of online fundraising. While existing research predominantly focuses on how a VI's appearance influences consumer decisions, this study addresses a notable gap by examining the joint effects of appearance and voice pitch on people's donation willingness—and how those effects differ with different levels of project urgency. Drawing on the Stereotype Content Model and Construal Level Theory, this research conducted three experiments for a period of three months in 2023 based on Chinese participants (Total N = 1000). The results demonstrate that for urgent charity projects, human-like (vs. anime-like) VIs with low-pitched (vs. high-pitched) voices lead to higher donations, because they elicit a greater sense of responsibility. Conversely, for non-urgent projects, human-like (vs. anime-like) VIs with high-pitched (vs. low-pitched) voices are more persuasive, due to their heightened perceived efficacy. By unveiling the fit between appearance and voice pitch of VIs and the fit between different VIs and charity projects, this research contributes to the existing literature and practice on endorsement in nonprofit fundraising.

Suggested Citation

  • Song, Jiehang & Zheng, Chundong & Lv, Xiarong & Font, Xavier, 2025. "The endorsement effectiveness of virtual influencers in nonprofit fundraising: The role of appearance and voice pitch," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:219:y:2025:i:c:s0040162525003300
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162525003300
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124299?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:219:y:2025:i:c:s0040162525003300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.