IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v69y2022ics0160791x22000835.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the stages of E-government development from public value perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Yi
  • Kimathi, Flora A.

Abstract

A variety of studies have put forward heterogeneous stage models of e-government development since 2000. However, there is lack of research on a general framework of the stages of e-government development and further theoretical foundations for the stages of e-government development seldom are discussed. Therefore, this study focuses on providing a general framework of the stages of e-government development from public value perspective. First, this study conceptualizes public value evolution from public management paradigms. Specifically, the evolution of three kinds of public value, that is, transparency, efficiency, and engagement, is identified from public management paradigms. Second, a general framework of three stages of e-government development is proposed to investigate e-government evolution approach, which consistes of information stage, transaction stage, and engagement stage. Every stage of e-government development aims at providing different focus of public value. Third, a case study is provided to demonstrate the feasibility of the three-stage-model of e-government development. Eventually, the practical implications of this model of e-government development are analyzed accordingly.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Yi & Kimathi, Flora A., 2022. "Exploring the stages of E-government development from public value perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:69:y:2022:i:c:s0160791x22000835
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101942
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X22000835
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101942?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Te Liu & Xuemin Yang & Yueping Zheng, 2020. "Understanding the evolution of public–private partnerships in Chinese e-government: four stages of development," Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(4), pages 222-247, October.
    2. Adam, Ibrahim Osman, 2020. "Examining E-Government development effects on corruption in Africa: The mediating effects of ICT development and institutional quality," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    3. Sangki, Jin, 2018. "Vision of future e-government via new e-government maturity model: Based on Korea's e-government practices," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(10), pages 860-871.
    4. Qiuyun Shang & Allison Price, 2019. "A Blockchain-Based Land Titling Project in the Republic of Georgia: Rebuilding Public Trust and Lessons for Future Pilot Projects," Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, MIT Press, vol. 12(3-4), pages 72-78, Winter-Sp.
    5. Verkijika, Silas Formunyuy & De Wet, Lizette, 2018. "A usability assessment of e-government websites in Sub-Saharan Africa," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 20-29.
    6. Krishnamurthy, Rashmi & Awazu, Yukika, 2016. "Liberating data for public value: The case of Data.gov," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 668-672.
    7. König, Pascal D. & Wenzelburger, Georg, 2021. "The legitimacy gap of algorithmic decision-making in the public sector: Why it arises and how to address it," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    8. Majdi Mellouli & Fatma Bouaziz & Omar Bentahar, 2020. "E-government success assessment from a public value perspective," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 153-174, July.
    9. Sonia Royo & Vicente Pina & Jaime Garcia-Rayado, 2020. "Decide Madrid: A Critical Analysis of an Award-Winning e-Participation Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, February.
    10. Majdi Mellouli & Fatma Bouaziz & Omar Bentahar, 2020. "E-government success assessment from a public value perspective," Post-Print hal-03021350, HAL.
    11. Safarov, Nuriiar, 2021. "Personal experiences of digital public services access and use: Older migrants’ digital choices," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    12. Khan, Sohrab & Umer, Rahila & Umer, Shumaila & Naqvi, Shabbar, 2021. "Antecedents of trust in using social media for E-government services: An empirical study in Pakistan," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    13. Adrian Smith & Pedro Prieto Martín, 2021. "Going Beyond the Smart City? Implementing Technopolitical Platforms for Urban Democracy in Madrid and Barcelona," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1-2), pages 311-330, April.
    14. Brown, A. & Fishenden, Jerry & Thompson, M. & Venters, Will, 2017. "Appraising the impact and role of platform models and Government as a Platform (GaaP) in UK Government public service reform: towards a Platform Assessment Framework (PAF)," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 73864, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Setyowati, Milla Sepliana & Utami, Niken Desila & Saragih, Arfah Habib & Hendrawan, Adang, 2023. "Strategic factors in implementing blockchain technology in Indonesia's value-added tax system," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    2. Nicu Gavriluță & Virgil Stoica & Gheorghe-Ilie Fârte, 2022. "The Official Website as an Essential E-Governance Tool: A Comparative Analysis of the Romanian Cities’ Websites in 2019 and 2022," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, June.
    3. Maura Campra & Paolo Esposito & Valerio Brescia, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility and technological perspectives in healthcare: An exploratory analysis of the evolution of the anti‐corruption system through multiple case studies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(6), pages 2816-2829, November.
    4. Weck, Marina & Jackson, Eric Blake & Sihvonen, Markus & Pappel, Ingrid, 2022. "Building smart living environments for ageing societies: Decision support for cross-border e-services between Estonia and Finland," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qalati, Sikander Ali & Yuan, Li Wen & Khan, Muhammad Aamir Shafique & Anwar, Farooq, 2021. "A mediated model on the adoption of social media and SMEs’ performance in developing countries," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    2. Dodik Ariyanto & Ayu Aryista Dewi & Henny Triyana Hasibuan & Rizky Bagus Paramadani, 2022. "The Success of Information Systems and Sustainable Information Society: Measuring the Implementation of a Village Financial System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Tejedo-Romero, Francisca & Araujo, Joaquim Filipe Ferraz Esteves & Tejada, Ángel & Ramírez, Yolanda, 2022. "E-government mechanisms to enhance the participation of citizens and society: Exploratory analysis through the dimension of municipalities," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    4. Banafo Akrong, Godwin & Yunfei, Shao & Owusu, Ebenezer, 2022. "Development and validation of an improved DeLone-McLean IS success model - application to the evaluation of a tax administration ERP," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    5. Prince Donkor Ameyaw & Walter Timo de Vries, 2020. "Transparency of Land Administration and the Role of Blockchain Technology, a Four-Dimensional Framework Analysis from the Ghanaian Land Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-25, December.
    6. Johnson, Nathan & Turnbull, Benjamin & Reisslein, Martin, 2022. "Social media influence, trust, and conflict: An interview based study of leadership perceptions," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    7. Wilson, Christopher & van der Velden, Maja, 2022. "Sustainable AI: An integrated model to guide public sector decision-making," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    8. Martens, Marijn & De Wolf, Ralf & Vadendriessche, Karel & Evens, Tom & De Marez, Lieven, 2021. "Applying contextual integrity to digital contact tracing and automated triage for hospitals during COVID-19," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    9. Palmyra Repette & Jamile Sabatini-Marques & Tan Yigitcanlar & Denilson Sell & Eduardo Costa, 2021. "The Evolution of City-as-a-Platform: Smart Urban Development Governance with Collective Knowledge-Based Platform Urbanism," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-25, January.
    10. Afful-Dadzie, Eric & Afful-Dadzie, Anthony, 2017. "Liberation of public data: Exploring central themes in open government data and freedom of information research," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 664-672.
    11. Mohammad Soltani Delgosha & Tahereh Saheb & Nastaran Hajiheydari, 0. "Modelling the Asymmetrical Relationships between Digitalisation and Sustainable Competitiveness: A Cross-Country Configurational Analysis," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-21.
    12. Asongu, Simplice A. & Biekpe, Nicholas & Cassimon, Danny, 2021. "On the diffusion of mobile phone innovations for financial inclusion," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    13. Njangang, Henri & Beleck, Alim & Tadadjeu, Sosson & Kamguia, Brice, 2022. "Do ICTs drive wealth inequality? Evidence from a dynamic panel analysis," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(2).
    14. Henri Njangang & Alim Beleck & Sosson Tadadjeu & Brice Kamguia, 2021. "Do ICTs drive wealth inequality? Evidence from a dynamic panel analysis," Working Papers of the African Governance and Development Institute. 21/057, African Governance and Development Institute..
    15. Serhiy SHKARLET & Igor OLIYCHENKO & Maksym DUBYNA & Maryna DITKOVSKA & Vladimir ZHOVTOK, 2020. "Comparative Analysis Of Best Practices In E-Government Implementation And Use Of This Experience By Developing Countries," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2020(34), pages 118-136, June.
    16. Osama Abied & Othman Ibrahim & Siti Nuur-Ila Mat Kamal & Ibrahim M. Alfadli & Weam M. Binjumah & Norafida Ithnin & Maged Nasser, 2022. "Probing Determinants Affecting Intention to Adopt Cloud Technology in E-Government Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-29, November.
    17. Carmen C. Rodríguez-Martínez & Mitzi Cubilla-Montilla & Purificación Vicente-Galindo & Purificación Galindo-Villardón, 2023. "X-STATIS: A Multivariate Approach to Characterize the Evolution of E-Participation, from a Global Perspective," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, March.
    18. Xiuping Zhang & Jaewon Choi, 2022. "The Importance of Social Influencer-Generated Contents for User Cognition and Emotional Attachment: An Information Relevance Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, May.
    19. Niki Derlukiewicz & Anna Mempel-Sniezyk & Dominika Mankowska, 2021. "Development of Innovation Economy - Activity of Local Government in Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 175-195.
    20. Igor L. Sazonets & Igor G. Hanin & ?ichael V. Ryabokon & Yuriy V. Pikalov, 2018. "Efficiency of Digital Public Administration System in the Course of Implementing the Innovative Potential of National Economy," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 542-548:5.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:69:y:2022:i:c:s0160791x22000835. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.