IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ininma/v37y2017i6p664-672.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Liberation of public data: Exploring central themes in open government data and freedom of information research

Author

Listed:
  • Afful-Dadzie, Eric
  • Afful-Dadzie, Anthony

Abstract

This paper conducts a comparative literature survey of Open Government Data (OGD) and Freedom of Information (FOI), with a view to tracking the central themes in the two civil society campaigns. With seeming similarities and a growing popularity in research, the major themes framing research on the two movements have not clearly emerged. Topic modelling, text mining and document analysis methods are used to extract the themes as well as key named entities. The topics are subsequently labeled and with expert guidance, their semantic meaning are provided. The results indicate that the major theme in FOI research borders on issues relating to disclosure, publishing, access and cost of requests. On the other hand, themes in OGD research have largely centered on technology and related concepts. The approach also helped in determining key similarities and differences in the two campaigns as reported in research.

Suggested Citation

  • Afful-Dadzie, Eric & Afful-Dadzie, Anthony, 2017. "Liberation of public data: Exploring central themes in open government data and freedom of information research," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 664-672.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:37:y:2017:i:6:p:664-672
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.05.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026840121630487X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.05.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Qi & Waltman, Ludo, 2016. "Large-scale analysis of the accuracy of the journal classification systems of Web of Science and Scopus," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 347-364.
    2. Krishnamurthy, Rashmi & Awazu, Yukika, 2016. "Liberating data for public value: The case of Data.gov," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 668-672.
    3. Aghaei Chadegani, Arezoo & Salehi, Hadi & Md Yunus, Melor & Farhadi, Hadi & Fooladi, Masood & Farhadi, Maryam & Ale Ebrahim, Nader, 2013. "A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases," MPRA Paper 46898, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 18 Mar 2013.
    4. Chyi-Kwei Yau & Alan Porter & Nils Newman & Arho Suominen, 2014. "Clustering scientific documents with topic modeling," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 100(3), pages 767-786, September.
    5. Angela M. Evans & Adriana Campos, 2013. "Open Government Initiatives: Challenges of Citizen Participation," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 172-185, January.
    6. Lau, Richard R. & Patel, Parina & Fahmy, Dalia F. & Kaufman, Robert R., 2014. "Correct Voting Across Thirty-Three Democracies: A Preliminary Analysis," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(2), pages 239-259, April.
    7. Jiang, Hanchen & Qiang, Maoshan & Lin, Peng, 2016. "A topic modeling based bibliometric exploration of hydropower research," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 226-237.
    8. Barbara Ubaldi, 2013. "Open Government Data: Towards Empirical Analysis of Open Government Data Initiatives," OECD Working Papers on Public Governance 22, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jinhua Chu & You-Yu Dai & Anyuan Zhong, 2023. "Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of Open Government Data Platforms: A Data Analysis of 61 Prefecture-Level Cities in China," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.
    2. Aminath Shausan & Aapeli Vuorinen, 2023. "Thirty-six years of contributions to queueing systems: a content analysis, topic modeling, and graph-based exploration of research published in the QUESTA journal," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 104(1), pages 3-18, June.
    3. McCarty, J. & Waibel, C. & Leow, S.W. & Schlueter, A., 2025. "Solar energy in the city: Data-driven review on urban photovoltaics," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    4. Michael Gusenbauer, 2022. "Search where you will find most: Comparing the disciplinary coverage of 56 bibliographic databases," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(5), pages 2683-2745, May.
    5. Raminta Pranckutė, 2021. "Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-59, March.
    6. Andreas Kappeler, 2015. "Estonia: Raising Productivity and Benefitting more from Openness," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1215, OECD Publishing.
    7. Massimiliano M. Pellegrini & Riccardo Rialti & Giacomo Marzi & Andrea Caputo, 2020. "Sport entrepreneurship: A synthesis of existing literature and future perspectives," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 795-826, September.
    8. Seri, Paolo & Bianchi, Annaflavia & Matteucci, Nicola, 2014. "Diffusion and usage of public e-services in Europe: An assessment of country level indicators and drivers," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 496-513.
    9. Amiri, Babak & Karimianghadim, Ramin, 2024. "A novel text clustering model based on topic modelling and social network analysis," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    10. Abood Khaled Alamoudi & Rotimi Boluwatife Abidoye & Terence Y. M. Lam, 2022. "The Impact of Stakeholders’ Management Measures on Citizens’ Participation Level in Implementing Smart Sustainable Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    11. Hoang, Yen Hai & Ngo, Vu Minh & Bich Vu, Ngoc, 2023. "Central bank digital currency: A systematic literature review using text mining approach," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    12. Kyuwoong Kim & Kyeongmin Park & Sungjoo Lee, 2019. "Investigating technology opportunities: the use of SAOx analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(1), pages 45-70, January.
    13. Perez-Vega, Rodrigo & Hopkinson, Paul & Singhal, Aishwarya & Mariani, Marcello M., 2022. "From CRM to social CRM: A bibliometric review and research agenda for consumer research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1-16.
    14. Rômulo de Oliveira Azevêdo & Paulo Rotela Junior & Luiz Célio Souza Rocha & Gianfranco Chicco & Giancarlo Aquila & Rogério Santana Peruchi, 2020. "Identification and Analysis of Impact Factors on the Economic Feasibility of Photovoltaic Energy Investments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-40, September.
    15. Dell'Anno, Roberto & Caferra, Rocco & Morone, Andrea, 2020. "A “Trojan Horse” in the peer-review process of fee-charging economic journals," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 14(3).
    16. Perianes-Rodriguez, Antonio & Ruiz-Castillo, Javier, 2017. "A comparison of the Web of Science and publication-level classification systems of science," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 32-45.
    17. Hajkowicz, Stefan & Sanderson, Conrad & Karimi, Sarvnaz & Bratanova, Alexandra & Naughtin, Claire, 2023. "Artificial intelligence adoption in the physical sciences, natural sciences, life sciences, social sciences and the arts and humanities: A bibliometric analysis of research publications from 1960-2021," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    18. Parul Khurana & Kiran Sharma, 2022. "Impact of h-index on author’s rankings: an improvement to the h-index for lower-ranked authors," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(8), pages 4483-4498, August.
    19. Katia A. Figueroa-Rodríguez & Francisco Hernández-Rosas & Benjamín Figueroa-Sandoval & Joel Velasco-Velasco & Noé Aguilar Rivera, 2019. "What Has Been the Focus of Sugarcane Research? A Bibliometric Overview," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-15, September.
    20. Zhenhua Chen & Laurie A. Schintler, 2023. "Rediscovering regional science: Positioning the field's evolving location in science and society," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(3), pages 617-642, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:37:y:2017:i:6:p:664-672. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-information-management .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.