IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v68y2022ics0160791x21002852.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on service robot adoption under different service scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Yun
  • Wang, Xingyuan
  • Wang, Shuyang

Abstract

In the future, service robots are expected to become an integral part of people's experience in the service field. However, customer adoption of service robots is still low due to factors such as mismatched service scenarios and customer perception barriers. Through three experiments, this study explored the effect of different service scenarios on service robot adoption and the underlying mechanisms. For credence service, customers had a significantly lower service robot adoption intention in the core component than in the peripheral component; however, customers' service robot adoption intentions in both the core and peripheral components for experience service were relatively high. Further, perceived uncertainty mediated the interaction effect between the service type and service component on service robot adoption intention. This study deepens our understanding of customer responses to service robots and provides actionable strategic support for service providers to implement service robots.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Yun & Wang, Xingyuan & Wang, Shuyang, 2022. "Research on service robot adoption under different service scenarios," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:68:y:2022:i:c:s0160791x21002852
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101810
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X21002852
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101810?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chiara Longoni & Andrea Bonezzi & Carey K Morewedge, 2019. "Resistance to Medical Artificial Intelligence," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 46(4), pages 629-650.
    2. Jin Sun & Hean Tat Keh & Angela Y. Lee, 2012. "The Effect of Attribute Alignability on Service Evaluation: The Moderating Role of Uncertainty," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(4), pages 831-847.
    3. Ming-Hui Huang & Roland T. Rust, 2017. "Technology-driven service strategy," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(6), pages 906-924, November.
    4. Reis, João & Melão, Nuno & Salvadorinho, Juliana & Soares, Bárbara & Rosete, Ana, 2020. "Service robots in the hospitality industry: The case of Henn-na hotel, Japan," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    5. Krishnamurthy, Sandeep, 2020. "The future of business education: A commentary in the shadow of the Covid-19 pandemic," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 1-5.
    6. Heng Tang & Xiaowan Lin, 2019. "Curbing shopping cart abandonment in C2C markets — an uncertainty reduction approach," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(3), pages 533-552, September.
    7. Min Zhang & Fang Qin & G. Alan Wang & Cheng Luo, 2020. "The impact of live video streaming on online purchase intention," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(9-10), pages 656-681, July.
    8. Sylvie Borau & Tobias Otterbring & Sandra Laporte & Samuel Fosso Wamba, 2021. "The most human bot: Female gendering increases humanness perceptions of bots and acceptance of AI," Post-Print hal-03648092, HAL.
    9. Markus Blut & Cheng Wang & Nancy V. Wünderlich & Christian Brock, 2021. "Understanding anthropomorphism in service provision: a meta-analysis of physical robots, chatbots, and other AI," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 632-658, July.
    10. Fernandes, Teresa & Oliveira, Elisabete, 2021. "Understanding consumers’ acceptance of automated technologies in service encounters: Drivers of digital voice assistants adoption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 180-191.
    11. Mingzhou Yu & Fang Liu & Julie Anne Lee, 2019. "Consumers’ responses to negative publicity: the influence of culture on information search and negative word-of-mouth," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(2), pages 141-156, March.
    12. Jin, Liyin & He, Yanqun & Song, Haiyan, 2012. "Service customization: To upgrade or to downgrade? An investigation of how option framing affects tourists’ choice of package-tour services," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 266-275.
    13. Brondi, Sonia & Pivetti, Monica & Di Battista, Silvia & Sarrica, Mauro, 2021. "What do we expect from robots? Social representations, attitudes and evaluations of robots in daily life," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    14. Ivanov, Stanislav & Webster, Craig & Garenko, Aleksandra, 2018. "Young Russian adults' attitudes towards the potential use of robots in hotels," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 24-32.
    15. Daniel Belanche & Luis V. Casaló & Carlos Flavián & Jeroen Schepers, 2020. "Service robot implementation: a theoretical framework and research agenda," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3-4), pages 203-225, March.
    16. Gansser, Oliver Alexander & Reich, Christina Stefanie, 2021. "A new acceptance model for artificial intelligence with extensions to UTAUT2: An empirical study in three segments of application," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    17. Shah, Sayed Kifayat & Zhongjun, Tang & Sattar, Abdul & XinHao, Zhou, 2021. "Consumer's intention to purchase 5G: Do environmental awareness, environmental knowledge and health consciousness attitude matter?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    18. Raquel Chocarro & Monica Cortinas & Maria Luisa Villanueva, 2021. "Different channels for different services: information sources for services with search, experience and credence attributes," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(3-4), pages 261-284, February.
    19. Darby, Michael R & Karni, Edi, 1973. "Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 16(1), pages 67-88, April.
    20. Xueming Luo & Siliang Tong & Zheng Fang & Zhe Qu, 2019. "Frontiers: Machines vs. Humans: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Disclosure on Customer Purchases," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(6), pages 937-947, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tong, Xinjia & Chen, Yuangao & Zhou, Shasha & Yang, Shuiqing, 2022. "How background visual complexity influences purchase intention in live streaming: The mediating role of emotion and the moderating role of gender," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    2. Uijin Jung & Jinseo Lee & Ji-Young Choi & Hyun Yim & Myoung-Jin Lee, 2023. "Future Service Robot Scenarios in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Zhang, Qi-nan & Zhang, Fan-fan & Mai, Qiang, 2023. "Robot adoption and labor demand: A new interpretation from external competition," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhu, Yimin & Zhang, Jiemin & Wu, Jifei & Liu, Yingyue, 2022. "AI is better when I'm sure: The influence of certainty of needs on consumers' acceptance of AI chatbots," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 642-652.
    2. Mark Anthony Camilleri & Ciro Troise, 2023. "Live support by chatbots with artificial intelligence: A future research agenda," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 17(1), pages 61-80, March.
    3. Jana Holthöwer & Jenny Doorn, 2023. "Robots do not judge: service robots can alleviate embarrassment in service encounters," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 767-784, July.
    4. Kamoonpuri, Sana Zehra & Sengar, Anita, 2023. "Hi, May AI help you? An analysis of the barriers impeding the implementation and use of artificial intelligence-enabled virtual assistants in retail," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    5. Ayyildiz, Ahu Yazici & Baykal, Muhammed & Koc, Erdogan, 2022. "Attitudes of hotel customers towards the use of service robots in hospitality service encounters," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    6. Mariani, Marcello M. & Hashemi, Novin & Wirtz, Jochen, 2023. "Artificial intelligence empowered conversational agents: A systematic literature review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    7. Zhang, Yaqiong & Wang, Shifu, 2023. "The influence of anthropomorphic appearance of artificial intelligence products on consumer behavior and brand evaluation under different product types," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    8. Chen Yang & Jing Hu, 2022. "When do consumers prefer AI-enabled customer service? The interaction effect of brand personality and service provision type on brand attitudes and purchase intentions," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(2), pages 167-189, March.
    9. Shengxing Yang, 2022. "A systematic literature review on the disruptions of artificial intelligence within the business world: in terms of the evolution of competences [Une revue systématique de la littérature sur les bo," Post-Print hal-03694170, HAL.
    10. Hu, Hai-hua & Ma, Fang, 2023. "Human-like bots are not humans: The weakness of sensory language for virtual streamers in livestream commerce," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    11. Vlačić, Božidar & Corbo, Leonardo & Costa e Silva, Susana & Dabić, Marina, 2021. "The evolving role of artificial intelligence in marketing: A review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 187-203.
    12. Taoufiq Dadouch & Bouchra Bennani & Malika Haoucha, 2023. "Consumer Acceptance of Mobile Shopping Apps, From Basic Apps to AI-Conversational Apps: A Literature Review," Post-Print hal-04194657, HAL.
    13. Borghi, Matteo & Mariani, Marcello M., 2022. "The role of emotions in the consumer meaning-making of interactions with social robots," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    14. Wien, Anders Hauge & Peluso, Alessandro M., 2021. "Influence of human versus AI recommenders: The roles of product type and cognitive processes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 13-27.
    15. Darima Fotheringham & Michael A. Wiles, 2023. "The effect of implementing chatbot customer service on stock returns: an event study analysis," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 802-822, July.
    16. Tinglong Dai & Sridhar Tayur, 2022. "Designing AI‐augmented healthcare delivery systems for physician buy‐in and patient acceptance," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4443-4451, December.
    17. Leah Warfield Smith & Randall Lee Rose & Alex R. Zablah & Heath McCullough & Mohammad “Mike” Saljoughian, 2023. "Examining post-purchase consumer responses to product automation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 530-550, May.
    18. Siliang Tong & Nan Jia & Xueming Luo & Zheng Fang, 2021. "The Janus face of artificial intelligence feedback: Deployment versus disclosure effects on employee performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(9), pages 1600-1631, September.
    19. Nika Meyer (née Mozafari) & Melanie Schwede & Maik Hammerschmidt & Welf Hermann Weiger, 2022. "Users taking the blame? How service failure, recovery, and robot design affect user attributions and retention," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2491-2505, December.
    20. Jan-Peter Kucklick & Jennifer Priefer & Daniel Beverungen & Oliver Müller, 2023. "Elucidating the Predictive Power of Search and Experience Qualities for Pricing of Complex Goods – A Machine Learning-based Study on Real Estate Appraisal," Working Papers Dissertations 112, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:68:y:2022:i:c:s0160791x21002852. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.