IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v217y2025ics0040162525001817.html

Moral decision-making in AI: A comprehensive review and recommendations

Author

Listed:
  • Ram, Jiwat

Abstract

The increased reliance on artificial intelligence (AI) systems for decision-making has raised corresponding concerns about the morality of such decisions. However, knowledge on the subject remains fragmentary, and cogent understanding is lacking. This study addresses the gap by using Templier and Paré's (2015) six-step framework to perform a systematic literature review on moral decision-making by AI systems. A data sample of 494 articles was analysed to filter 280 articles for content analysis. Key findings are as follows: (1) Building moral decision-making capabilities in AI systems faces a variety of challenges relating to human decision-making, technology, ethics and values. The absence of consensus on what constitutes moral decision-making and the absence of a general theory of ethics are at the core of such challenges. (2) The literature is focused on narrative building; modelling or experiments/empirical studies are less illuminating, which causes a shortage of evidence-based knowledge. (3) Knowledge development is skewed towards a few domains, such as healthcare and transport. Academically, the study developed a four-pronged classification of challenges and a four-dimensional set of recommendations covering 18 investigation strands, to steer research that could resolve conflict between different moral principles and build a unified framework for moral decision-making in AI systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Ram, Jiwat, 2025. "Moral decision-making in AI: A comprehensive review and recommendations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:217:y:2025:i:c:s0040162525001817
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162525001817
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124150?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Awad Edmond & Bonnefon Jean-François & Shariff Azim & Rahwan Iyad, 2019. "The Thorny Challenge of Making Moral Machines: Ethical Dilemmas with Self-Driving Cars," NIM Marketing Intelligence Review, Sciendo, vol. 11(2), pages 42-47, November.
    2. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-09-2020-4934 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Jean-Marie John-Mathews & Dominique Cardon & Christine Balagué, 2022. "From reality to world. A critical perspective on AI fairness," Post-Print hal-03549730, HAL.
    4. Andreia Martinho & Nils Herber & Maarten Kroesen & Caspar Chorus, 2021. "Ethical issues in focus by the autonomous vehicles industry," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(5), pages 556-577, September.
    5. Kirsten Martin, 2019. "Ethical Implications and Accountability of Algorithms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 835-850, December.
    6. Othmar Manfred Lehner & Kim Ittonen & Hanna Silvola & Eva Ström & Alena Wührleitner, 2022. "Artificial intelligence based decision-making in accounting and auditing: ethical challenges and normative thinking," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(9), pages 109-135, June.
    7. Edmond Awad & Sohan Dsouza & Richard Kim & Jonathan Schulz & Joseph Henrich & Azim Shariff & Jean-François Bonnefon & Iyad Rahwan, 2018. "The Moral Machine experiment," Nature, Nature, vol. 563(7729), pages 59-64, November.
    8. Lee, In & Shin, Yong Jae, 2020. "Machine learning for enterprises: Applications, algorithm selection, and challenges," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 157-170.
    9. Mamak, Kamil & Glanc, Jadwiga, 2022. "Problems with the prospective connected autonomous vehicles regulation: Finding a fair balance versus the instinct for self-preservation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    10. Behera, Rajat Kumar & Bala, Pradip Kumar & Rana, Nripendra P. & Irani, Zahir, 2023. "Responsible natural language processing: A principlist framework for social benefits," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    11. Daniel Kahneman, 2003. "Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(5), pages 1449-1475, December.
    12. O.C. Ferrell & Linda Ferrell, 2021. "Applying the Hunt Vitell ethics model to artificial intelligence ethics," Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(2), pages 178-188, April.
    13. Vesnic-Alujevic, Lucia & Nascimento, Susana & Pólvora, Alexandre, 2020. "Societal and ethical impacts of artificial intelligence: Critical notes on European policy frameworks," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(6).
    14. Ivy Munoko & Helen L. Brown-Liburd & Miklos Vasarhelyi, 2020. "The Ethical Implications of Using Artificial Intelligence in Auditing," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(2), pages 209-234, November.
    15. Ulrich Leicht-Deobald & Thorsten Busch & Christoph Schank & Antoinette Weibel & Simon Schafheitle & Isabelle Wildhaber & Gabriel Kasper, 2019. "The Challenges of Algorithm-Based HR Decision-Making for Personal Integrity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(2), pages 377-392, December.
    16. Jake B. Telkamp & Marc H. Anderson, 2022. "The Implications of Diverse Human Moral Foundations for Assessing the Ethicality of Artificial Intelligence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(4), pages 961-976, July.
    17. Wernaart, Bart, 2021. "Developing a roadmap for the moral programming of smart technology," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    18. Xie, Yibo & Ma, Wenbin & Ma, Yichuan & Ren, Zhouqi & Tong, Zelin & Wang, Yihuan, 2023. "A counterfactual thinking perspective of moral licensing effect in machine-driven communication: An example of natural language processing chatbot developed based on WeChat API," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    19. Kumar, Girish & James, Ajith Tom & Choudhary, Krishna & Sahai, Rishi & Song, Weon Keun, 2022. "Investigation and analysis of implementation challenges for autonomous vehicles in developing countries using hybrid structural modeling," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    20. Smeele, Nicholas V.R. & Chorus, Caspar G. & Schermer, Maartje H.N. & de Bekker-Grob, Esther W., 2023. "Towards machine learning for moral choice analysis in health economics: A literature review and research agenda," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    21. Jean-Marie John-Mathews & Dominique Cardon & Christine Balagué, 2022. "From Reality to World. A Critical Perspective on AI Fairness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(4), pages 945-959, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fischer, Björn & Frennert, Susanne, 2025. "Towards an experiential ethics of AI and robots: A review of empirical research on human encounters," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jake B. Telkamp & Marc H. Anderson, 2022. "The Implications of Diverse Human Moral Foundations for Assessing the Ethicality of Artificial Intelligence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(4), pages 961-976, July.
    2. Maude Lavanchy & Patrick Reichert & Jayanth Narayanan & Krishna Savani, 2023. "Applicants’ Fairness Perceptions of Algorithm-Driven Hiring Procedures," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(1), pages 125-150, November.
    3. Manis, K.T. & Madhavaram, Sreedhar, 2023. "AI-Enabled marketing capabilities and the hierarchy of capabilities: Conceptualization, proposition development, and research avenues," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    4. Emilia Vann Yaroson & Amélie Abadie & Mélanie Roux, 2025. "Human-artificial intelligence collaboration in supply chain outcomes: the mediating role of responsible artificial intelligence," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 354(1), pages 35-69, November.
    5. Chenfeng Yan & Quan Chen & Xinyue Zhou & Xin Dai & Zhilin Yang, 2024. "When the Automated fire Backfires: The Adoption of Algorithm-based HR Decision-making Could Induce Consumer’s Unfavorable Ethicality Inferences of the Company," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(4), pages 841-859, April.
    6. Maria Figueroa-Armijos & Brent B. Clark & Serge P. da Motta Veiga, 2023. "Ethical Perceptions of AI in Hiring and Organizational Trust: The Role of Performance Expectancy and Social Influence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 179-197, August.
    7. Florian Pethig & Julia Kroenung, 2023. "Biased Humans, (Un)Biased Algorithms?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(3), pages 637-652, March.
    8. Paul Kofman, 2025. "Scoring the Ethics of AI Robo-Advice: Why We Need Gateways and Ratings," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 198(1), pages 21-33, April.
    9. Lu, Yangyang & Zhang, Jing, 2025. "Balancing identity diversity and product contexts: Understanding consumer trust in AI-enhanced chatbot services," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    10. Qian, Lixian & Yin, Juelin & Huang, Youlin & Liang, Ya, 2023. "The role of values and ethics in influencing consumers’ intention to use autonomous vehicle hailing services," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    11. Chen, Pengyu & Chu, Zhongzhu & Zhao, Miao, 2024. "The Road to corporate sustainability: The importance of artificial intelligence," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    12. Alaskar, Mohammad Zaid & Kim, Ja Ryong & Nguyen, Tam Huy & Rafique, Muhammad, 2025. "Balancing performance and ethics: Navigating visual recognition technology adoption in the auditing industry," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    13. Adrian GROȘANU & Melinda-Timea FÜLÖP & Nicolae MĂGDAȘ, 2024. "Ethical Dilemmas in Digital Accounting: A Comprehensive Literature Review," CECCAR Business Review, Body of Expert and Licensed Accountants of Romania (CECCAR), vol. 5(4), pages 56-67, April.
    14. Bonsón, Enrique & Lavorato, Domenica & Lamboglia, Rita & Mancini, Daniela, 2021. "Artificial intelligence activities and ethical approaches in leading listed companies in the European Union," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    15. Chen, Xun-Qi & Ma, Chao-Qun & Ren, Yi-Shuai & Lei, Yu-Tian & Huynh, Ngoc Quang Anh & Narayan, Seema, 2023. "Explainable artificial intelligence in finance: A bibliometric review," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    16. Alina Köchling & Marius Claus Wehner, 2020. "Discriminated by an algorithm: a systematic review of discrimination and fairness by algorithmic decision-making in the context of HR recruitment and HR development," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(3), pages 795-848, November.
    17. Kuhn, Marc & Reit, Vanessa & Schwing, Maximilian & Selinka, Sarah, 2024. "“Let the Driver off the Hook?” moral decisions of autonomous cars and their impact on consumer well-being," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    18. Claudy, Marius C. & Parkinson, Mary & Aquino, Karl, 2024. "Why should innovators care about morality? Political ideology, moral foundations, and the acceptance of technological innovations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    19. Luo, Haotian & Yu, Jinlei & Mu, Tong & Zhou, Peng, 2025. "Spillover effects of enterprise digital transformation on supply chain carbon emissions: Evidence from China," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 606-617.
    20. Craig Reeves & Matthew Sinnicks, 2024. "Totally Administered Heteronomy: Adorno on Work, Leisure, and Politics in the Age of Digital Capitalism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 193(2), pages 285-301, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:217:y:2025:i:c:s0040162525001817. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.