IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v200y2024ics0040162523007874.html

The optimization of a corporate social responsibility management system based on service-orientated architecture under the concept of sustainable development

Author

Listed:
  • Su, Kun
  • Liu, Chengyun
  • Zhang, Miaomiao

Abstract

Against the background of globalization, the trend of corporate social responsibility is irreversible. In this study, a motivation analysis framework and evaluation index system of corporate social responsibility under dual constraints are established and an index system of corporate social responsibility evaluation is designed. A multiple linear regression analysis is used to build an evaluation index system model of cement enterprises' corporate social responsibility accounting. To further improve the fidelity between this model and the actual situation of cement enterprises, a self-adaptive Service-Oriented Architecture reasoning system, constructed by integrating the reasoning function of Service-Orientated Architecture logic and the learning function of the neural network, improves the evaluation index system model of the social responsibility accounting of enterprises. Through experimental analysis, the error of the corporate social responsibility accounting evaluation index in this study was within 10 %, indicating a good prediction effect. According to this set of standards, enterprises must fulfill their social responsibilities to be helpful in the future development of corporate social responsibility evaluations.

Suggested Citation

  • Su, Kun & Liu, Chengyun & Zhang, Miaomiao, 2024. "The optimization of a corporate social responsibility management system based on service-orientated architecture under the concept of sustainable development," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:200:y:2024:i:c:s0040162523007874
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162523007874
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123102?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Esben Pedersen, 2010. "Modelling CSR: How Managers Understand the Responsibilities of Business Towards Society," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 91(2), pages 155-166, January.
    2. Du, Yunzhou & Kim, Phillip H., 2021. "One size does not fit all: Strategy configurations, complex environments, and new venture performance in emerging economies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 272-285.
    3. Liu, Chengyun & Su, Kun & Zhang, Miaomiao, 2021. "Water disclosure and financial reporting quality for social changes: Empirical evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    4. Khojastehpour, Morteza & Shams, S.M. Riad, 2020. "Addressing the complexity of stakeholder management in international ecological setting: A CSR approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 302-309.
    5. Won‐Moo Hur & Seung‐Yoon Rhee & Eun Ju Lee & Hyewon Park, 2022. "Corporate social responsibility perceptions and sustainable safety behaviors among frontline employees: The mediating roles of organization‐based self‐esteem and work engagement," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 60-70, January.
    6. Yunhong Hao & Qamar Farooq & Yanni Zhang, 2018. "Unattended social wants and corporate social responsibility of leading firms: Relationship of intrinsic motivation of volunteering in proposed welfare programs and employee attributes," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 1029-1038, November.
    7. Abdelkarim Asdiou & Bouchaib Mokhtari, 2019. "The Indicators of the Corporate Social Responsibility: A Search for Efficiency or a Concern for Legitimacy Towards Stakeholders? A Proposed Explanatory Model," International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology (IJSSMET), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 10(1), pages 62-76, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Edibe Begüm Özeren & Ömer Özeren, 2025. "ChatGPT as a Jury? Multi-Modal AI Versus Human Evaluation in an Architectural Design Competition," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qamar Farooq & Jie Hao & Xuan Liu & Di Xiao & Yunhong Hao, 2020. "Social and environmental development: Fresh concepts and soft measures towards sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 1796-1803, November.
    2. Tang, Chaoli & Dong, Shuyun & Zhou, Rui, 2025. "The impact of digitalization on corporate resilience," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    3. Shen Zhong & Zhicheng Zhou & Hongjun Jing & Daizhi Jin, 2025. "What Affects Durable National Innovation Performance? An Analysis in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(3), pages 11856-11895, September.
    4. Fabien Martinez, 2014. "Corporate strategy and the environment: towards a four-dimensional compatibility model for fostering green management decisions," Post-Print hal-02887618, HAL.
    5. Zhongju Liao & Yuhan Wu, 2025. "Formal institutions, informal institutions, and firms' environmental innovation: An application of the fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis method," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 668-680, February.
    6. Xue, Biao & Lin, Yan & Ren, Fangxiao & Li, Runfo, 2024. "Business environment ecosystem and manufacturing upgrading: A configurational approach," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1225-1237.
    7. Matthew Walker & Stephen Hills & Bob Heere, 2017. "Evaluating a Socially Responsible Employment Program: Beneficiary Impacts and Stakeholder Perceptions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(1), pages 53-70, June.
    8. Zijian Zhang & Yinghao Lin & Xiaoyuan Wang & Xin Zhang, 2024. "Pathways to Resilient and Sustainable Online Education in the New Normal: Interpreting University Teachers’ Willingness to Use Online Teaching Platforms Consistently," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-20, November.
    9. Christina W. Y. Wong & Chee Yew Wong & Sakun Boon-itt & Ailie K. Y. Tang, 2021. "Strategies for Building Environmental Transparency and Accountability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-25, August.
    10. Ying Zhou & Tianping Bi & Miao Yu & Chengju Gong, 2026. "Multi-perspective evaluation of city sustainability and configuration analysis based on fsQCA method: a case study of Liaoning Province, China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 5341-5367, March.
    11. Qamar Farooq & Peihua Fu & Yunhong Hao & Tchamy Jonathan & Yanni Zhang, 2019. "A Review of Management and Importance of E-Commerce Implementation in Service Delivery of Private Express Enterprises of China," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(1), pages 21582440188, January.
    12. Anat Toder‐Alon & Eyal Rosenstreich & Tali Te'eni Harari, 2019. "Give or take? Consumers' ambivalent perspectives on the relationship between a firm's corporate social responsibility engagement and its responsible tax payments," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 872-884, July.
    13. Mengyuan Lu & Bin Guo & Xinyu Wang, 2025. "Revitalizing Idle Rural Homesteads: Configurational Paths of Farmer Differentiation and Cognition Synergistically Driving Revitalization Intentions," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-25, April.
    14. Madeleine Feder & Barbara E. Weißenberger, 2019. "Understanding the behavioral gap: Why would managers (not) engage in CSR-related activities?," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 95-126, April.
    15. Liyuan Zheng & Ling Ye & Mengjiao Wang & Yingdi Wang & Haiwei Zhou, 2022. "Does Water Matter? The Impact of Water Vulnerability on Corporate Financial Performance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-19, September.
    16. Jinyan Wen & Donghua Tan & Honglue Wang & Yanxiao Gao, 2025. "How Do Alliance Networks Affect Firms’ Capability of Influencing Technological Standardization? Configuration Analysis Based on the TOE Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-21, October.
    17. Zhou, Chao & Lin, Feng, 2024. "Does global diversification promote or hinder green innovation? Evidence from Chinese multinational corporations," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    18. Anna Kwiotkowska, 2024. "Creating Organizational Resilience through Digital Transformation and Dynamic Capabilities: Findings from fs/QCA Analysis on the Example of Polish CHP Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-18, July.
    19. José María Agudo-Valiente & Concepción Garcés-Ayerbe & Manuel Salvador-Figueras, 2017. "Corporate Social Responsibility Drivers and Barriers According to Managers’ Perception; Evidence from Spanish Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-24, October.
    20. repec:bcp:journl:v:7:y:2023:i:5:p:1431-1441 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Javier Martínez‐Falcó & Bartolomé Marco‐Lajara & Patrocinio Zaragoza‐Sáez & Luis A. Millán‐Tudela, 2023. "Analyzing the effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Green Innovation Performance in the Spanish wine industry: A structural equation modeling analysis," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(4), pages 985-1006, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:200:y:2024:i:c:s0040162523007874. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.