IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v195y2023ics0040162523004298.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Designing a reverse supply chain network with quality control for returned products: Strategies to mitigate free-riding effect and ensure compliance with technology licensing requirements

Author

Listed:
  • Ebrahimi Bajgani, Sahar
  • Saberi, Sara
  • Toyasaki, Fuminori

Abstract

For agility and cost-effectiveness, remanufacturing was highlighted as a solution to a capacity shortage for ventilators during the Covid-19 pandemic. In post-pandemic times, recycling was introduced as a solution to raw material shortcomings. However, it is recognized that implementing these reverse logistics activities creates operational challenges, including quality control of returned ventilators and product information leakage of product information in the process of passing technical information from the original equipment manufacturer (OEM)s to the reverse logistic service provider. The proposed reverse supply chain network model includes competing collection centers, third party remanufacturers (remanufactures), and recyclers investigating the case of ventilator products in three pandemic scenarios: pre-pandemic, during the pandemic, and post-pandemic. The minimum acceptable quality for remanufacturing is determined. The model is then extended with technology acquisition settings to allow remanufacturers to receive OEM licenses for accessing technical needs. The possible leakage of technical information is then considered, along with incentivizing and penalizing strategies. We found that the penalizing strategy improves the technology acquisition level at the cost of reducing the overall profit, while the incentivizing strategy can maintain the profittextcolorblacks but does not markedly improve the technology acquisition level remarkably.

Suggested Citation

  • Ebrahimi Bajgani, Sahar & Saberi, Sara & Toyasaki, Fuminori, 2023. "Designing a reverse supply chain network with quality control for returned products: Strategies to mitigate free-riding effect and ensure compliance with technology licensing requirements," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:195:y:2023:i:c:s0040162523004298
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122744
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162523004298
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122744?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nima Kazemi & Nikunja Mohan Modak & Kannan Govindan, 2019. "A review of reverse logistics and closed loop supply chain management studies published in IJPR: a bibliometric and content analysis," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(15-16), pages 4937-4960, August.
    2. Jamali, Mohammad-Bagher & Rasti-Barzoki, Morteza, 2022. "A game-theoretic approach for examining government support strategies and licensing contracts in an electricity supply chain with technology spillover: A case study of Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    3. Anna Nagurney & Dong Li, 2015. "A supply chain network game theory model with product differentiation, outsourcing of production and distribution, and quality and price competition," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 226(1), pages 479-503, March.
    4. Zheng, Xiao-Xue & Liu, Zhi & Li, Kevin W. & Huang, Jun & Chen, Ji, 2019. "Cooperative game approaches to coordinating a three-echelon closed-loop supply chain with fairness concerns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 92-110.
    5. Qiang, Qiang & Ke, Ke & Anderson, Trisha & Dong, June, 2013. "The closed-loop supply chain network with competition, distribution channel investment, and uncertainties," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 186-194.
    6. Zaby, Alexandra K., 2009. "The propensity to patent in oligopolistic markets," Tübinger Diskussionsbeiträge 323, University of Tübingen, School of Business and Economics.
    7. Feng Yang & Chuanya Jiao & Sheng Ang, 2019. "The optimal technology licensing strategy under supply disruption," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(7), pages 2057-2082, April.
    8. Yang, Guang-fen & Wang, Zhi-ping & Li, Xiao-qiang, 2009. "The optimization of the closed-loop supply chain network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 16-28, January.
    9. Pietro De Giovanni & Georges Zaccour, 2022. "A selective survey of game-theoretic models of closed-loop supply chains," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 314(1), pages 77-116, July.
    10. Yuan, Yanhong & Yang, Jinyao & Li, Yang & Li, Wei, 2020. "Necessary conditions for coordination of dual-channel closed-loop supply chain," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    11. Mohannad Radhi & Guoqing Zhang, 2016. "Optimal configuration of remanufacturing supply network with return quality decision," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(5), pages 1487-1502, March.
    12. Saberi, Sara & Cruz, Jose M. & Sarkis, Joseph & Nagurney, Anna, 2018. "A competitive multiperiod supply chain network model with freight carriers and green technology investment option," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 934-949.
    13. Heger, Diana & Zaby, Alexandra K., 2009. "The propensity to patent with vertically differentiated products: An empirical investigation," Tübinger Diskussionsbeiträge 325, University of Tübingen, School of Business and Economics.
    14. Toyasaki, Fuminori & Daniele, Patrizia & Wakolbinger, Tina, 2014. "A variational inequality formulation of equilibrium models for end-of-life products with nonlinear constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(1), pages 340-350.
    15. Hong, Xianpei & Govindan, Kannan & Xu, Lei & Du, Peng, 2017. "Quantity and collection decisions in a closed-loop supply chain with technology licensing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(3), pages 820-829.
    16. Yanting Huang & Zongjun Wang, 2019. "Pricing and production decisions in a closed-loop supply chain considering strategic consumers and technology licensing," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(9), pages 2847-2866, May.
    17. Yang, Yong-cong & Nie, Pu-yan, 2022. "Subsidy for clean innovation considered technological spillover," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    18. Yue Tan & Chunxiang Guo, 2019. "Research on Two-Way Logistics Operation with Uncertain Recycling Quality in Government Multi-Policy Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, February.
    19. Tosarkani, Babak Mohamadpour & Amin, Saman Hassanzadeh & Zolfagharinia, Hossein, 2020. "A scenario-based robust possibilistic model for a multi-objective electronic reverse logistics network," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    20. Jeihoonian, Mohammad & Kazemi Zanjani, Masoumeh & Gendreau, Michel, 2017. "Closed-loop supply chain network design under uncertain quality status: Case of durable products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 470-486.
    21. Jie Ning & Volodymyr Babich, 2018. "R&D Investments in the Presence of Knowledge Spillover and Debt Financing: Can Risk Shifting Cure Free Riding?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 97-112, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chan, Chi Kin & Zhou, Yan & Wong, Kar Hung, 2019. "An equilibrium model of the supply chain network under multi-attribute behaviors analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 514-535.
    2. Zhou, Yan & Chan, Chi Kin & Wong, Kar Hung, 2018. "A multi-period supply chain network equilibrium model considering retailers’ uncertain demands and dynamic loss-averse behaviors," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 51-76.
    3. E. Allevi & A. Gnudi & I. V. Konnov & G. Oggioni, 2018. "Evaluating the effects of environmental regulations on a closed-loop supply chain network: a variational inequality approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 261(1), pages 1-43, February.
    4. Qiao, Haike & Su, Qin, 2021. "Distribution channel and licensing strategy choice considering consumer online reviews in a closed-loop supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    5. Hamdouch, Younes & Ghoudi, Kilani, 2020. "A Supply Chain Equilibrium Model with General Price-Dependent Demand," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    6. Sung Hoon Chung & Robert D. Weaver & Hyun Woo Jeon, 2020. "Sustainable Management of Remanufacturing in Dynamic Supply Chains," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 703-731, September.
    7. Dong Li & Anna Nagurney, 2017. "Supply chain performance assessment and supplier and component importance identification in a general competitive multitiered supply chain network model," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 67(1), pages 223-250, January.
    8. Nagurney, Anna, 2021. "Supply chain game theory network modeling under labor constraints: Applications to the Covid-19 pandemic," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(3), pages 880-891.
    9. Zhang, Abraham & Wang, Jason X. & Farooque, Muhammad & Wang, Yulan & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2021. "Multi-dimensional circular supply chain management: A comparative review of the state-of-the-art practices and research," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    10. Qiuyun Zhu & Xiaoyang Zhou & Aijun Liu & Chong Gao & Lei Xu & Fan Zhao & Ding Zhang & Benjamin Lev, 2022. "Equilibrium Optimization with Multi-Energy-Efficiency-Grade Products: Government and Market Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-23, October.
    11. Yan Zhou & Xue-Qi Liu & Kar-Hung Wong, 2021. "Remanufacturing Policies Options for a Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-26, June.
    12. Cao, Jian & Wu, Sisi & Kumar, Sanjay, 2023. "Recovering and remanufacturing to fulfill EPR regulation in the presence of secondary market," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    13. Guitao Zhang & Xiao Zhang & Hao Sun & Xinyu Zhao, 2021. "Three-Echelon Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network Equilibrium under Cap-and-Trade Regulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-26, June.
    14. Lili Ding & Zhimeng Guo & Yuemei Xue, 2023. "Dump or recycle? Consumer's environmental awareness and express package disposal based on an evolutionary game model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 6963-6986, July.
    15. Xuemei Zhang & Haodong Zheng & Tao Hang & Qiang Meng, 2024. "How to Choose Recycling Mode between Monopoly and Competition by Considering Blockchain Technology?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-29, July.
    16. Lang Liu & Lulu Wang & Taisheng Huang & Jinhui Pang, 2022. "The Differential Game of a Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Manufacturer Competition Considering Goodwill," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, May.
    17. Anna Nagurney & Deniz Besik & Ladimer S. Nagurney, 2019. "Global supply chain networks and tariff rate quotas: equilibrium analysis with application to agricultural products," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 75(2), pages 439-460, October.
    18. Yu, Min & Cruz, Jose M. & Li, Dong Michelle, 2019. "The sustainable supply chain network competition with environmental tax policies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 218-231.
    19. Frontczak, Robert, 2009. "Valuing options in Heston's stochastic volatility model: Another analytical approach," Tübinger Diskussionsbeiträge 326, University of Tübingen, School of Business and Economics.
    20. Melissa Zengin & Saman Hassanzadeh Amin & Guoqing Zhang, 2024. "Closing the Gap: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature on Closed-Loop Supply Chains," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-16, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:195:y:2023:i:c:s0040162523004298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.