IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v48y2000i3p213-216.html

Testing current status data for dependent censoring

Author

Listed:
  • Rabinowitz, Daniel

Abstract

An approach to testing current status data for dependence between the examination times and the event times is presented. The approach is based on a rank statistic that detects decreasing trends, as a function of the examination time, in the probability that the event occurs before the examination.

Suggested Citation

  • Rabinowitz, Daniel, 2000. "Testing current status data for dependent censoring," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 213-216, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:48:y:2000:i:3:p:213-216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-7152(99)00202-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Klein, Roger W & Spady, Richard H, 1993. "An Efficient Semiparametric Estimator for Binary Response Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 61(2), pages 387-421, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ai, Chunrong & Chen, Xiaohong, 2007. "Estimation of possibly misspecified semiparametric conditional moment restriction models with different conditioning variables," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 5-43, November.
    2. Patricia Moreno-Mencia & Ana Fernández-Sainz & Juan M. Rodríguez-Póo, 2025. "Do depressive symptoms influence nonattendance at work? A semiparametric approach," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 67-85, March.
    3. Töpfer, Marina, 2017. "Detailed RIF decomposition with selection: The gender pay gap in Italy," Hohenheim Discussion Papers in Business, Economics and Social Sciences 26-2017, University of Hohenheim, Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences.
    4. Bucher, Axel & El Ghouch, Anouar & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2014. "Single-index quantile regression models for censored data," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2014001, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    5. Park, Byeong U. & Simar, Léopold & Zelenyuk, Valentin, 2017. "Nonparametric estimation of dynamic discrete choice models for time series data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 97-120.
    6. Ming-Yueh Huang & Chin-Tsang Chiang, 2017. "Estimation and Inference Procedures for Semiparametric Distribution Models with Varying Linear-Index," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 44(2), pages 396-424, June.
    7. Mittelhammer, Ron C. & Judge, George, 2011. "A family of empirical likelihood functions and estimators for the binary response model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 164(2), pages 207-217, October.
    8. Lahiri, Kajal & Yang, Liu, 2013. "Forecasting Binary Outcomes," Handbook of Economic Forecasting, in: G. Elliott & C. Granger & A. Timmermann (ed.), Handbook of Economic Forecasting, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 1025-1106, Elsevier.
    9. Mittelhammer, Ronald C. & Judge, George G., 2008. "A Minimum Power Divergence Class of CDFs and Estimators for Binary Choice Models," CUDARE Working Papers 37759, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    10. Ye, Xin & Garikapati, Venu M. & You, Daehyun & Pendyala, Ram M., 2017. "A practical method to test the validity of the standard Gumbel distribution in logit-based multinomial choice models of travel behavior," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 173-192.
    11. Cizek, Pavel, 2008. "Robust and Efficient Adaptive Estimation of Binary-Choice Regression Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103, pages 687-696, June.
    12. Geweke, John, 2003. "Econometric issues in using the AHEAD panel," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 115-120, January.
    13. Lewbel, Arthur & McFadden, Daniel & Linton, Oliver, 2011. "Estimating features of a distribution from binomial data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 162(2), pages 170-188, June.
    14. Tue Gørgens, 1999. "Semiparametric Estimation of Single-Index Transition Intensities," Discussion Papers 99-25, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
    15. Yoosoon Chang & Joon Y. Park & Guo Yan, 2025. "Slope Consistency of Quasi-Maximum Likelihood Estimator for Binary Choice Models," Papers 2505.02327, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2026.
    16. Johannes Hoelzemann & Ryan Webb & Erhao Xie, 2024. "Non-Parametric Identification and Testing of Quantal Response Equilibrium," Staff Working Papers 24-24, Bank of Canada.
    17. Chen, Le-Yu & Lee, Sokbae, 2019. "Breaking the curse of dimensionality in conditional moment inequalities for discrete choice models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 210(2), pages 482-497.
    18. Juan Carlos Escanciano & Kyungchul Song, 2007. "Asymptotically Optimal Tests for Single-Index Restrictions with a Focus on Average Partial Effects," PIER Working Paper Archive 07-005, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    19. Charlier, Erwin & Melenberg, Bertrand & van Soest, Arthur, 2001. "An analysis of housing expenditure using semiparametric models and panel data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 101(1), pages 71-107, March.
    20. Coppejans, Mark, 2001. "Estimation of the binary response model using a mixture of distributions estimator (MOD)," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 231-269, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:48:y:2000:i:3:p:213-216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.