IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v226y2025ics0167715225001099.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cochran–Mantel–Haeszel stratified-adjusted test for multiple odds ratios

Author

Listed:
  • Ghoshal, Asmita
  • Chen, John T.

Abstract

The Cochran–Mantel–Haeszel test (thereby CMH test) is commonly applied to test whether exposure to a risk factor has significant impact on the clinical outcome. However, studies in medical research often require the identification of several significant risk factors simultaneously. In the literature, one of the ubiquitous approaches that strongly control the familywise error rate for multiple tests is the Holm’s step-down procedure. It elegantly applies the first-degree Bonferroni inequality at each step to make inference decisions. On the other hand, when the number of to-be-tested hypotheses is large, Holm’s procedure unavoidably inherits the conservativeness of the Bonferroni inequality, which makes it almost useless when dealing with large number of populations. In this paper, we propose a sequentially rejective procedure for simultaneous inference on odds ratios. We prove that, when testing multiple odds ratios, the new procedure is uniformly more powerful than the Holm’s procedure. Simulation studies show that the improvement is substantial in some scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Ghoshal, Asmita & Chen, John T., 2025. "Cochran–Mantel–Haeszel stratified-adjusted test for multiple odds ratios," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:226:y:2025:i:c:s0167715225001099
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2025.110464
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715225001099
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spl.2025.110464?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:226:y:2025:i:c:s0167715225001099. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.