IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v106y2017icp65-76.html

Simultaneous confidence intervals for comparisons of several multinomial samples

Author

Listed:
  • Schaarschmidt, Frank
  • Gerhard, Daniel
  • Vogel, Charlotte

Abstract

Multinomial data occur if the major outcome of an experiment is the classification of experimental units into more than two mutually exclusive categories. In experiments with several treatment groups, one may then be interested in multiple comparisons between the treatments w.r.t several definitions of odds between the multinomial proportions. Asymptotic methods are described for constructing simultaneous confidence intervals for this inferential problem. Further, alternative methods based on sampling from Dirichlet posterior distributions with vague Dirichlet priors are described. Monte Carlo simulations are performed to compare these methods w.r.t. their frequentist simultaneous coverage probabilities for a wide range of sample sizes and multinomial proportions: The methods have comparable properties for large samples and no rare events involved. In small sample situations or when rare events are involved in the sense that the expected values in some cells of the contingency table are as low as 5 or 10, the method based on sampling from the Dirichlet posterior yields simultaneous coverage probabilities closest to the nominal confidence level. The methods are provided in an R-package and their application is illustrated for examples from developmental toxicology and differential blood counts.

Suggested Citation

  • Schaarschmidt, Frank & Gerhard, Daniel & Vogel, Charlotte, 2017. "Simultaneous confidence intervals for comparisons of several multinomial samples," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 65-76.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:106:y:2017:i:c:p:65-76
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2016.09.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947316302122
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2016.09.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:bla:biomet:v:71:y:2015:i:4:p:985-995 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. A. Hayter, 2014. "Recursive formulas for multinomial probabilities with applications," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 29(5), pages 1207-1219, October.
    3. Schaarschmidt, Frank, 2013. "Simultaneous confidence intervals for multiple comparisons among expected values of log-normal variables," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 265-275.
    4. Reiczigel, Jeno & Abonyi-Tóth, Zsolt & Singer, Júlia, 2008. "An exact confidence set for two binomial proportions and exact unconditional confidence intervals for the difference and ratio of proportions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(11), pages 5046-5053, July.
    5. Ivan S. F. Chan & Zhongxin Zhang, 1999. "Test-Based Exact Confidence Intervals for the Difference of Two Binomial Proportions," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(4), pages 1202-1209, December.
    6. Mandel, Micha & Betensky, Rebecca A., 2008. "Simultaneous confidence intervals based on the percentile bootstrap approach," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 2158-2165, January.
    7. Hou, Chia-Ding & Chiang, Jengtung & Tai, John Jen, 2003. "A family of simultaneous confidence intervals for multinomial proportions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 29-45, May.
    8. Martin, Andrew D. & Quinn, Kevin M. & Park, Jong Hee, 2011. "MCMCpack: Markov Chain Monte Carlo in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 42(i09).
    9. Michael P. Fay & Michael A. Proschan & Erica Brittain, 2015. "Combining one-sample confidence procedures for inference in the two-sample case," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(1), pages 146-156, March.
    10. Chafaï, Djalil & Concordet, Didier, 2009. "Confidence Regions for the Multinomial Parameter With Small Sample Size," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 104(487), pages 1071-1079.
    11. Alexander Shapiro & Jos Berge, 2002. "Statistical inference of minimum rank factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 67(1), pages 79-94, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Munk, A. & Skipka, G. & Stratmann, B., 2005. "Testing general hypotheses under binomial sampling: the two sample case--asymptotic theory and exact procedures," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 723-739, June.
    2. Nowak, Piotr Bolesław, 2016. "The MLE of the mean of the exponential distribution based on grouped data is stochastically increasing," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 49-54.
    3. Dirk Tasche, 2009. "Estimating discriminatory power and PD curves when the number of defaults is small," Papers 0905.3928, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2010.
    4. Karim, Md Aktar Ul & Bhagat, Supriya Ramdas & Bhowmick, Amiya Ranjan, 2022. "Empirical detection of parameter variation in growth curve models using interval specific estimators," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    5. repec:isu:genstf:2008010108000016857 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Hengtao Zhang & Guosheng Yin, 2021. "Response‐adaptive rerandomization," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(5), pages 1281-1298, November.
    7. Zhang, Ruijing & Dai, Hongzhe, 2022. "A non-Gaussian stochastic model from limited observations using polynomial chaos and fractional moments," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    8. Andrew Gelman & Daniel Lee & Jiqiang Guo, 2015. "Stan," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 40(5), pages 530-543, October.
    9. Camilo Alberto Cárdenas-Hurtado & Aaron Levi Garavito-Acosta & Jorge Hernán Toro-Córdoba, 2018. "Asymmetric Effects of Terms of Trade Shocks on Tradable and Non-tradable Investment Rates: The Colombian Case," Borradores de Economia 1043, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
    10. Zuoxian Gan & Tao Feng & Min Yang, 2018. "Exploring the Effects of Car Ownership and Commuting on Subjective Well-Being: A Nationwide Questionnaire Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    11. Rolando de la Cruz & Oslando Padilla & Mauricio A. Valle & Gonzalo A. Ruz, 2021. "Modeling Recidivism through Bayesian Regression Models and Deep Neural Networks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-14, March.
    12. Chao Xu & Didit O Pribadi & Dagmar Haase & Stephan Pauleit, 2020. "Incorporating spatial autocorrelation and settlement type segregation to improve the performance of an urban growth model," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(7), pages 1184-1200, September.
    13. Anastasiou, Andreas, 2017. "Bounds for the normal approximation of the maximum likelihood estimator from m-dependent random variables," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 171-181.
    14. Philippe Flandre, 2011. "Statistical Methods in Recent HIV Noninferiority Trials: Reanalysis of 11 Trials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-8, September.
    15. Charlotte Micheloud & Fadoua Balabdaoui & Leonhard Held, 2023. "Assessing replicability with the sceptical p$$ p $$‐value: Type‐I error control and sample size planning," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 77(4), pages 573-591, November.
    16. Lanqing Hong & Zhi-Sheng Ye & Ran Ling, 2018. "Environmental Risk Assessment of Emerging Contaminants Using Degradation Data," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 23(3), pages 390-409, September.
    17. Liu, Baisen & Xu, Lin & Zheng, Shurong & Tian, Guo-Liang, 2014. "A new test for the proportionality of two large-dimensional covariance matrices," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 293-308.
    18. Shu-Chih Su & Xiaoming Li & Yanli Zhao & Ivan S. F. Chan, 2018. "Population-Enrichment Adaptive Design Strategy for an Event-Driven Vaccine Efficacy Trial," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 10(2), pages 357-370, August.
    19. Evelina Di Corso & Tania Cerquitelli & Daniele Apiletti, 2018. "METATECH: METeorological Data Analysis for Thermal Energy CHaracterization by Means of Self-Learning Transparent Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-24, May.
    20. Silva, Ivair R., 2017. "Confidence intervals through sequential Monte Carlo," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 112-124.
    21. Jos'e Luis Montiel Olea & Chen Qiu & Jorg Stoye, 2023. "Decision Theory for Treatment Choice Problems with Partial Identification," Papers 2312.17623, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2025.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:106:y:2017:i:c:p:65-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.