Simultaneous confidence intervals for multiple comparisons among expected values of log-normal variables
In biological and medical research, continuous, strictly positive, right-skewed data, possibly with heterogeneous variances, are common, and can be described by log-normal distributions. In experiments involving multiple treatments in a one-way layout, various sets of multiple comparisons among the treatments and corresponding simultaneous confidence intervals can be of interest. The focus is on multiple contrasts of the expected values of the treatments. Previously published methods based on normal approximations and generalized pivotal quantities are extended to the case of multiple contrasts. These methods are evaluated in a simulation study that involves comparisons to a control group, all pairwise comparisons and, to illustrate more general multiple contrast types, a non-standard type of contrast matrix. A method based on generalized pivotal quantities is recommended because it is superior to all other methods in terms of simultaneous coverage probability and because the type-I-errors are distributed almost equally between lower and upper confidence bounds. Methods based on normal approximations are found to be very liberal and biased with respect to directional type-I-errors. These methods are illustrated with an example from pharmaceutical research.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 58 (2013)
Issue (Month): C ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda|
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Li, Xinmin & Wang, Juan & Liang, Hua, 2011. "Comparison of several means: A fiducial based approach," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(5), pages 1993-2002, May.
- Mandel, Micha & Betensky, Rebecca A., 2008. "Simultaneous confidence intervals based on the percentile bootstrap approach," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 2158-2165, January.
- Li, Xinmin, 2009. "A generalized p-value approach for comparing the means of several log-normal populations," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(11), pages 1404-1408, June.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:58:y:2013:i:c:p:265-275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Shamier, Wendy)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.