IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Piercing the veil: The marginalization of midwives in the United States


  • Goodman, Steffie


This paper investigates the marginalization of certified nurse-midwives (CNMs) in the US. This marginalization occurs despite ample evidence demonstrating that a midwifery model delivers high-quality cost-effective care. Currently midwives attend only 7% of births, compared to 50-75% of births in other developed countries. Given the escalating costs of health care and relatively poor maternal and child health indicators in comparison with other developed countries, these findings are disturbing. This paper investigates this paradox through a qualitative case study of two prestigious but declining midwifery services in a large US city. Fifty-two multi-sited in-depth interviews were conducted along with an analysis of relevant archival sources. It was found that institutions successfully altered maternity care and diminished midwifery services without accountability for their actions. These findings illuminate the larger political-economic forces that shape the marginalization of midwifery in the US.

Suggested Citation

  • Goodman, Steffie, 2007. "Piercing the veil: The marginalization of midwives in the United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 610-621, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:65:y:2007:i:3:p:610-621

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Jackson, D.J. & Lang, J.M. & Swartz, W.H. & Ganiats, T.G. & Fullerton, J. & Ecker, J. & Nguyen, U., 2003. "Outcomes, Safety, and Resource Utilization in a Collaborative Care Birth Center Program Compared with Traditional Physician-Based Perinatal Care," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 93(6), pages 999-1006.
    2. Elizabeth Docteur & Hannes Suppanz & Jaejoon Woo, 2003. "The US Health System: An Assessment and Prospective Directions for Reform," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 350, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Pieters, A.J.H.M. & van Oorschot, K.E. & Akkermans, H.A., 2012. "Care & cure combined : Using simulation to develop organization design theory for health care processes," Other publications TiSEM cde21ab0-f8d7-4056-a98e-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. McCabe, Katharine, 2016. "Mothercraft: Birth work and the making of neoliberal mothers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 177-184.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stolpe, Michael, 2003. "Ressourcen und Ergebnisse der globalen Gesundheitsökonomie: Einführung und Überblick," Kiel Working Papers 1177, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW).
    2. Markowitz, Sara & Adams, E. Kathleen & Lewitt, Mary Jane & Dunlop, Anne L., 2017. "Competitive effects of scope of practice restrictions: Public health or public harm?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 201-218.
    3. Kumpmann, Ingmar, 2009. "Monopolistic Competition and Costs in the Health Care Sector," IWH Discussion Papers 17/2009, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    4. Greß, Stefan & Walendzik, Anke & Wasem, Jürgen, 2005. "Nichtversicherte Personen im Krankenversicherungssystem der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Bestandsaufnahme und Lösungsmöglichkeiten," IBES Diskussionsbeiträge 147, University of Duisburg-Essen, Institute of Business and Economic Studie (IBES).
    5. Cacace, Mirella, 2007. "The changing public/private mix in the American Health Care System," TranState Working Papers 58, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    6. Jan Mertl, 2014. "The Impact of Longevity on Health Care Systems," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 85-100.


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:65:y:2007:i:3:p:610-621. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.