IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v388y2026ics0277953625011013.html

Are individuals with persistently high conspiracy mentality also persistently vaccine-hesitant? Findings from a three-wave panel study

Author

Listed:
  • Lamot, Monika
  • Kirbiš, Andrej
  • Kerman, Katja

Abstract

Conspiracy mentality and vaccine hesitancy are frequently linked, yet most evidence is cross-sectional and cannot separate stable between-person differences from within-person change. Thus, it remains unclear whether conspiracy mentality drives vaccine hesitancy or vice versa. In addition, trust in science has been proposed as a key pathway connecting the two. To tackle these questions, we carried out a three-wave panel of adults (N = 574, Mean age = 52.80, SD = 15.88; 47.4 % men), who were followed over four months. Conspiracy mentality, trust in science, and vaccine hesitancy were measured at each wave. Longitudinal measurement invariance was evaluated prior to modeling. In the cross-lagged panel model, a small cross-lag emerged from conspiracy mentality at Wave 2 to vaccine hesitancy at Wave 3; other cross-lags were non-significant. In the random-intercept cross-lagged panel model, all within-person cross-lags were non-significant, while the random-intercept correlation between the two constructs was strong, indicating substantial trait-level overlap. A three-wave, time-lagged mediation model showed a significant indirect effect from conspiracy mentality to vaccine hesitancy via lower trust in science. The findings suggest that conspiracy mentality and vaccine hesitancy co-exist as stable, correlated dispositions rather than displaying robust short-term within-person effects. At the population level, lower trust in science appears to be a key pathway linking conspiracy mentality to higher vaccine hesitancy. Interventions should therefore emphasize building trust in science.

Suggested Citation

  • Lamot, Monika & Kirbiš, Andrej & Kerman, Katja, 2026. "Are individuals with persistently high conspiracy mentality also persistently vaccine-hesitant? Findings from a three-wave panel study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 388(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:388:y:2026:i:c:s0277953625011013
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118770
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625011013
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118770?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:plo:pone00:0089177 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    3. Sahil Loomba & Alexandre Figueiredo & Simon J. Piatek & Kristen Graaf & Heidi J. Larson, 2021. "Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(3), pages 337-348, March.
    4. Sahil Loomba & Alexandre Figueiredo & Simon J. Piatek & Kristen Graaf & Heidi J. Larson, 2021. "Author Correction: Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(7), pages 960-960, July.
    5. Monika Lamot & Katja Kerman & Andrej Kirbiš, 2022. "Distrustful, Dissatisfied, and Conspiratorial: A Latent Profile Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccination Rejection," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-11, August.
    6. Milošević Đorđević, J. & Mari, S. & Vdović, M. & Milošević, A., 2021. "Links between conspiracy beliefs, vaccine knowledge, and trust: Anti-vaccine behavior of Serbian adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    7. Patrick Sturgis & Ian Brunton-Smith & Jonathan Jackson, 2021. "Trust in science, social consensus and vaccine confidence," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(11), pages 1528-1534, November.
    8. Coelho, Priscila & Foster, Katrina & Nedri, Meriam & Marques, Mathew D., 2022. "Increased belief in vaccination conspiracy theories predicts increases in vaccination hesitancy and powerlessness: Results from a longitudinal study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    9. Filip Viskupič & David L. Wiltse & Brittney A. Meyer, 2022. "Trust in physicians and trust in government predict COVID‐19 vaccine uptake," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 103(3), pages 509-520, May.
    10. Romer, Daniel & Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, 2021. "Conspiratorial thinking, selective exposure to conservative media, and response to COVID-19 in the US," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    11. Sahil Loomba & Alexandre Figueiredo & Simon J. Piatek & Kristen Graaf & Heidi J. Larson, 2021. "Author Correction: Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(3), pages 407-407, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vilmantė Pakalniškienė & Antanas Kairys & Vytautas Jurkuvėnas & Vita Mikuličiūtė & Viktorija Ivleva, 2022. "Could Belief in Fake News Predict Vaccination Behavior in the Elderly?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Giulietti, Corrado & Vlassopoulos, Michael & Zenou, Yves, 2023. "When reality bites: Local deaths and vaccine take-up," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    3. Matthew R DeVerna & Rachith Aiyappa & Diogo Pacheco & John Bryden & Filippo Menczer, 2024. "Identifying and characterizing superspreaders of low-credibility content on Twitter," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(5), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Kejriwal, Saransh & Sheth, Sarjan & Silpa, P.S. & Sarkar, Sumit & Guha, Apratim, 2022. "Attaining herd immunity to a new infectious disease through multi-stage policies incentivising voluntary vaccination," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    5. Masamune IWASAWA & Hayato NAKANISHI & Yuki ONOZUKA, 2025. "The Impact of Media Type on Belief Variance: Evidence from a Panel Study," Discussion papers 25049, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    6. Ahmad Naoras Bitar & Mohammed Zawiah & Fahmi Y Al-Ashwal & Mohammed Kubas & Ramzi Mukred Saeed & Rami Abduljabbar & Ammar Ali Saleh Jaber & Syed Azhar Syed Sulaiman & Amer Hayat Khan, 2021. "Misinformation, perceptions towards COVID-19 and willingness to be vaccinated: A population-based survey in Yemen," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-14, October.
    7. Palmer, Amitabha & Gorman, Sara, 2025. "Misinformation, trust, and health: The case for information environment as a major independent social determinant of health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 381(C).
    8. Jingyuan Yu & Emese Domahidi & Duccio Gamannossi degl’Innocenti & Fabiana Zollo, 2026. "Crisis, country, and party lines: politicians’ misinformation behavior and public engagement," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, February.
    9. Bussolo,Maurizio & Sarma,Nayantara & Torre,Ivan, 2022. "Indirect Effects of COVID-19 Nonpharmaceutical Interventions on Vaccine Acceptance," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10106, The World Bank.
    10. Serina Chang & Adam Fourney & Eric Horvitz, 2024. "Measuring vaccination coverage and concerns of vaccine holdouts from web search logs," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, December.
    11. Peter Romero & Eisaku Daniel Tanaka & Yuki Mikiya & Shinya Yoshino & Atsushi Oshio & Teruo Nakatsuma, 2023. "Vaccine Uptake - Geographic Psychology or the Information Field?," Working Papers e191, Tokyo Center for Economic Research.
    12. Alex Mukembo, 2023. "Motivators and Barriers to Uptake of Covid-19 Vaccination among Health Workers in Uganda," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 48(2), pages 39569-39575, January.
    13. Lonneke M. Poort & Jac. A. A. Swart & Ruth Mampuys & Arend J. Waarlo & Paul C. Struik & Lucien Hanssen, 2022. "Restore politics in societal debates on new genomic techniques," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(4), pages 1207-1216, December.
    14. Hess, Stephane & Lancsar, Emily & Mariel, Petr & Meyerhoff, Jürgen & Song, Fangqing & van den Broek-Altenburg, Eline & Alaba, Olufunke A. & Amaris, Gloria & Arellana, Julián & Basso, Leonardo J. & Ben, 2022. "The path towards herd immunity: Predicting COVID-19 vaccination uptake through results from a stated choice study across six continents," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    15. Maureen Ayikoru, & Cole, Jennifer & Dodds, Klaus & Atcero, Milburga & Bada, Joseph K. & Petrikova, Ivica & Worodria, William, 2023. "Addressing vaccine concerns through the spectrum of vaccine acceptance," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
    16. Nihal Ahmed & Dilawar Khan & Judit Oláh & József Popp, 2023. "A comparative study of the policy response to COVID-19 in the ASEAN region: A dynamic simulated ARDL approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(1), pages 1-16, January.
    17. repec:bcp:journl:v:7:y:2023:i:5:p:1139-1164 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Motta, Matt & Motta, Gabriella & Stecula, Dominik, 2023. "Sick as a Dog? The Prevalence, Politicization, and Health Policy Consequences of Canine Vaccine Hesitancy (CVH)," SocArXiv qmbkv, Center for Open Science.
    19. Gabriele Beccari & Matilde Giaccherini & Joanna Kopinska & Gabriele Rovigatti, 2023. "Refueling a Quiet Fire: Old Truthers and New Discontent in the Wake of Covid-19," CESifo Working Paper Series 10803, CESifo.
    20. Liu, Li-Ying & Cai, Chao-Ran & Zhang, Si-Ping & Li, Bin-Quan, 2025. "Coexistence of positive and negative information in information-epidemic dynamics on multiplex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 666(C).
    21. Hoy,Christopher Alexander & Rajee Kanagavel & Cameron,Corey Morales, 2022. "Intra-Household Dynamics and Attitudes toward Vaccines : Experimental and Survey Evidencefrom Zambia," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10136, The World Bank.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:388:y:2026:i:c:s0277953625011013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.