IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v381y2025ics0277953625006033.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Misinformation, trust, and health: The case for information environment as a major independent social determinant of health

Author

Listed:
  • Palmer, Amitabha
  • Gorman, Sara

Abstract

We argue for the inclusion of information environment as a major independent element in social determinants of health (SDoH) models. During the early COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare policymakers began to recognize the threat medical misinformation presents to public health, however, major health agencies have yet to formally adopt information environments into their models, which indicates that further argument and advocacy are required to bring about needed institutional changes. We present empirical evidence demonstrating how information environments significantly influence health-related beliefs, behaviors, and outcomes. Drawing on cultural evolution, social epistemology, and social network analysis, we integrate multidisciplinary theoretical frameworks which explain and predict how information environments function analogously to established SDoH factors. This parallel implies that healthcare institutions should apply similar resources and concern to information environments as they do to other SDoH. Recognizing information environment as an SDoH is critical for addressing health inequities in the digital age. We conclude with policy recommendations for public health institutions. By incorporating information environment into SDoH models, health policy can more effectively combat misinformation, promote health equity, and improve population health outcomes in our increasingly complex information landscape.

Suggested Citation

  • Palmer, Amitabha & Gorman, Sara, 2025. "Misinformation, trust, and health: The case for information environment as a major independent social determinant of health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 381(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:381:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625006033
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625006033
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118272?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:381:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625006033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.