IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v366y2025ics0277953625000218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Frontline professionals’ experiences of navigating boundaries in a layered care and support system for individuals with complex care needs in the Netherlands

Author

Listed:
  • van Muijden, Teyler
  • Petit-Steeghs, Violet
  • Aspria, Marcello
  • Bal, Roland
  • van de Bovenkamp, Hester

Abstract

Fragmented care systems, characterized by horizontal and vertical boundaries, hinder interprofessional collaboration for individuals with complex care needs. This study explores how frontline professionals navigate these boundaries to foster collaboration within a national program promoting integrated care for individuals with ‘misunderstood behaviour’ in the Netherlands. Using a boundary work lens, we analysed 44 semi-structured interviews with frontline professionals from the social, care, and safety domains. Our findings reveal that frontline professionals employ a multifaceted repertoire of collaborative boundary work strategies. These strategies include adjusting boundaries (expanding roles and tasks to address individuals' needs), spanning boundaries (creating boundary spanners, co-locations, and boundary objects), and working around boundaries (finding creative solutions to overcome financial and legislative limitations). The choice of strategy deployed depended on the agency professionals experienced in relation to specific types of boundaries. Professionals' limited agency regularly constrained the effectiveness of strategies. In these cases, professionals relied on interventions of higher-level actors. This reliance involved both direct interventions by managers and administrators to rearrange boundaries and indirect support, empowering frontline professionals with the flexibility and autonomy to navigate boundaries themselves. These findings introduce a power dimension to the conceptualization of boundary work and underscore the importance of addressing the interconnectedness of different types of boundaries at various levels.

Suggested Citation

  • van Muijden, Teyler & Petit-Steeghs, Violet & Aspria, Marcello & Bal, Roland & van de Bovenkamp, Hester, 2025. "Frontline professionals’ experiences of navigating boundaries in a layered care and support system for individuals with complex care needs in the Netherlands," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 366(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:366:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625000218
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117692
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625000218
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117692?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:366:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625000218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.