IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/hecopl/v7y2012i01p125-146_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Overcoming fragmentation in health care: chronic care in Austria, Germany and the Netherlands

Author

Listed:
  • Nolte, Ellen
  • Knai, Cécile
  • Hofmarcher, Maria
  • Conklin, Annalijn
  • Erler, Antje
  • Elissen, Arianne
  • Flamm, Maria
  • Fullerton, Brigit
  • Sönnichsen, Andreas
  • Vrijhoef, Hubertus J. M.

Abstract

The growing recognition of care fragmentation is causing many countries to explore new approaches to healthcare delivery that can bridge the boundaries between professions, providers and institutions and so better support the rising number of people with chronic health problems. This paper examines the role of the regulatory, funding and organisational context for the development and implementation of approaches to chronic care, using examples from Austria, Germany and the Netherlands. We find that the three countries have implemented a range of policies and approaches to achieve better coordination within and across the primary and secondary care interface and so better meet the needs of patients with chronic conditions. This has involved changes to the regulatory framework to support more coordinated approaches to care (Austria, Germany), coupled with financial incentives (Austria, Germany) or changes in payment systems (the Netherlands). What is common to the three countries is the comparative ‘novelty’ of policies and approaches aimed at fostering coordinated care; however, the evidence of their impact remains unclear.

Suggested Citation

  • Nolte, Ellen & Knai, Cécile & Hofmarcher, Maria & Conklin, Annalijn & Erler, Antje & Elissen, Arianne & Flamm, Maria & Fullerton, Brigit & Sönnichsen, Andreas & Vrijhoef, Hubertus J. M., 2012. "Overcoming fragmentation in health care: chronic care in Austria, Germany and the Netherlands," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(1), pages 125-146, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:hecopl:v:7:y:2012:i:01:p:125-146_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744133111000338/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kriegel, Johannes & Rissbacher, Clemens & Pölzl, Alois & Tuttle-Weidinger, Linda & Reckwitz, Nanni, 2020. "Levers for integrating social work into primary healthcare networks in Austria," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 75-82.
    2. Knai, Cécile & Brusamento, Serena & Legido-Quigley, Helena & Saliba, Vanessa & Panteli, Dimitra & Turk, Eva & Car, Josip & McKee, Martin & Busse, Reinhard, 2012. "Systematic review of the methodological quality of clinical guideline development for the management of chronic disease in Europe," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 157-167.
    3. He, Alex Jingwei & Tang, Vivien F.Y., 2021. "Integration of health services for the elderly in Asia: A scoping review of Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(3), pages 351-362.
    4. Hofmarcher, Maria M. & Festl, Eva & Bishop-Tarver, Leslie, 2016. "Health sector employment growth calls for improvements in labor productivity," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(8), pages 894-902.
    5. Francesca Casalini & Chiara Seghieri & Michele Emdin & Sabina Nuti, 2017. "Nuovi strumenti di management per la gestione integrata dei percorsi assistenziali dei pazienti cronici," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(102), pages 35-59.
    6. Susanne Schnitzer & Raphael Kohl & Hella Fügemann & Kathrin Gödde & Judith Stumm & Fabian Engelmann & Ulrike Grittner & Nina Rieckmann, 2022. "Patient Navigation—Who Needs What? Awareness of Patient Navigators and Ranking of Their Tasks in the General Population in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-13, March.
    7. Kuili Zhang & Bing Ran, 2022. "Active Health Governance—A Conceptual Framework Based on a Narrative Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-14, February.
    8. Chiara Natalie Focacci, 2023. "Old versus young: How much do countries spend on social benefits? Deterministic modeling for government expenditure," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 363-377, February.
    9. Knai, Cécile & Nolte, Ellen & Brunn, Matthias & Elissen, Arianne & Conklin, Annalijn & Pedersen, Janice Pedersen & Brereton, Laura & Erler, Antje & Frølich, Anne & Flamm, Maria & Fullerton, Birgitte &, 2013. "Reported barriers to evaluation in chronic care: Experiences in six European countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(2), pages 220-228.
    10. Yasar A. Ozcan & Jaya Khushalani, 2017. "Assessing efficiency of public health and medical care provision in OECD countries after a decade of reform," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 25(2), pages 325-343, June.
    11. Ester Risco & Glòria Sauch & Anna Albero & Nihan Acar-Denizli & Adelaida Zabalegui & Belchin Kostov & Paloma Amil & Albert Alonso & Ana Rios & Jaume Martín & Núria Fabrellas, 2020. "Spanish Validation of the “User Reported Measure of Care Coordination” Questionnaire for Older People with Complex, Chronic Conditions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-13, September.
    12. Arianne M J Elissen & Dorijn F L Hertroijs & Nicolaas C Schaper & Hans Bosma & Pieter C Dagnelie & Ronald M Henry & Carla J van der Kallen & Annemarie Koster & Miranda T Schram & Coen D A Stehouwer & , 2017. "Differences in biopsychosocial profiles of diabetes patients by level of glycaemic control and health-related quality of life: The Maastricht Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, July.
    13. Schang, Laura & Thomson, Sarah & Czypionka, Thomas, 2016. "Explaining differences in stakeholder take up of disease management programmes: A comparative analysis of policy implementation in Austria and Germany," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(3), pages 281-292.
    14. Elissen, Arianne M.J. & Struijs, Jeroen N. & Baan, Caroline A. & Ruwaard, Dirk, 2015. "Estimating community health needs against a Triple Aim background: What can we learn from current predictive risk models?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(5), pages 672-679.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:hecopl:v:7:y:2012:i:01:p:125-146_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/hep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.