IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i18p6608-d411950.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spanish Validation of the “User Reported Measure of Care Coordination” Questionnaire for Older People with Complex, Chronic Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Ester Risco

    (Intermediated Care Hospital Parc Sanitari Pere Virgili, 08035 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Glòria Sauch

    (Research Support Unit Catalunya Central, Fundació Institut Universitari per a la Recerca a l’Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Catalan Health Institute, Catalunya Central, 08272 Sant Fruitós del Bages, Spain)

  • Anna Albero

    (Emergency Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Nihan Acar-Denizli

    (Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science and Letters, Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, 34427 Istanbul, Turkey)

  • Adelaida Zabalegui

    (FEANS, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Belchin Kostov

    (Primary Healthcare Transversal Research Group, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Primary Care Centre Les Corts, Consorci d’Atenció Primària de Salut Barcelona Esquerra (CAPSBE), 08036 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Paloma Amil

    (Chronicity Prevention and Care Programme, Health Planning General Directorate, Ministry of Health, Government of Catalonia, 08028 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Albert Alonso

    (Fundació Clínic per a la Recerca Biomèdica, 08036 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Ana Rios

    (Catalan Health Institute, 08007 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Jaume Martín

    (Research Suport Unit Barcelona, Fundació Institut Universitari per a la Recerca a l’Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Catalan Health Institute Barcelona, 08025 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Núria Fabrellas

    (Department of Public Health, Mental Health and Perinatal Nursing, Universitat de Barcelona, 08907 Barcelona, Spain)

Abstract

Introduction: Older people with complex, chronic conditions often receive insufficient or inefficient care provision, and few instruments are able to measure their perception of care provision. The “User Reported Measure of Care Coordination” instrument has been satisfactorily used to evaluate chronic care provision and integration. The aim of this study is to validate this instrument in Spanish. Methods: The questionnaire was adapted and validated in two phases: translation and cultural adaptation of the questionnaire and psychometric property measurement. Study population were chronic care conditions patients. Results: A total of 332 participants completed test re-test as part of the questionnaire validation process. The final version of the questionnaire had 6 domains: Health and Well-being (D1), Health day to day (D2), Social Services (D3), Planned Care (D4), Urgent Care (D5), and Hospital Care (D6). Cronbach’s alpha for the overall questionnaire was 0.86, indicating good internal consistency. When analyzing each domain, only Planned Care (D4) and Urgent Care (D5) had Cronbach’s Alphas slightly lower than 0.7, although this could be related to the low number of items in each domain. A good temporal stability was observed for the distinct subscales and items, with intraclass correlation coefficients varying from 0.412 to 0.929 ( p < 0.05). Conclusion: The adapted version of the “User Reported Measure of Care Coordination” into Spanish proved to be a practical tool for use in our daily practice and an efficient instrument for assessment of care coordination in chronic, complex conditions in older people across services and levels of care.

Suggested Citation

  • Ester Risco & Glòria Sauch & Anna Albero & Nihan Acar-Denizli & Adelaida Zabalegui & Belchin Kostov & Paloma Amil & Albert Alonso & Ana Rios & Jaume Martín & Núria Fabrellas, 2020. "Spanish Validation of the “User Reported Measure of Care Coordination” Questionnaire for Older People with Complex, Chronic Conditions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-13, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:18:p:6608-:d:411950
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6608/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6608/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nolte, Ellen & Knai, Cécile & Hofmarcher, Maria & Conklin, Annalijn & Erler, Antje & Elissen, Arianne & Flamm, Maria & Fullerton, Brigit & Sönnichsen, Andreas & Vrijhoef, Hubertus J. M., 2012. "Overcoming fragmentation in health care: chronic care in Austria, Germany and the Netherlands," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(1), pages 125-146, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Susanne Schnitzer & Raphael Kohl & Hella Fügemann & Kathrin Gödde & Judith Stumm & Fabian Engelmann & Ulrike Grittner & Nina Rieckmann, 2022. "Patient Navigation—Who Needs What? Awareness of Patient Navigators and Ranking of Their Tasks in the General Population in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Francesca Casalini & Chiara Seghieri & Michele Emdin & Sabina Nuti, 2017. "Nuovi strumenti di management per la gestione integrata dei percorsi assistenziali dei pazienti cronici," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(102), pages 35-59.
    3. Elissen, Arianne M.J. & Struijs, Jeroen N. & Baan, Caroline A. & Ruwaard, Dirk, 2015. "Estimating community health needs against a Triple Aim background: What can we learn from current predictive risk models?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(5), pages 672-679.
    4. Yasar A. Ozcan & Jaya Khushalani, 2017. "Assessing efficiency of public health and medical care provision in OECD countries after a decade of reform," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 25(2), pages 325-343, June.
    5. Kuili Zhang & Bing Ran, 2022. "Active Health Governance—A Conceptual Framework Based on a Narrative Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-14, February.
    6. Chiara Natalie Focacci, 2023. "Old versus young: How much do countries spend on social benefits? Deterministic modeling for government expenditure," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 363-377, February.
    7. Arianne M J Elissen & Dorijn F L Hertroijs & Nicolaas C Schaper & Hans Bosma & Pieter C Dagnelie & Ronald M Henry & Carla J van der Kallen & Annemarie Koster & Miranda T Schram & Coen D A Stehouwer & , 2017. "Differences in biopsychosocial profiles of diabetes patients by level of glycaemic control and health-related quality of life: The Maastricht Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, July.
    8. Knai, Cécile & Nolte, Ellen & Brunn, Matthias & Elissen, Arianne & Conklin, Annalijn & Pedersen, Janice Pedersen & Brereton, Laura & Erler, Antje & Frølich, Anne & Flamm, Maria & Fullerton, Birgitte &, 2013. "Reported barriers to evaluation in chronic care: Experiences in six European countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(2), pages 220-228.
    9. Kriegel, Johannes & Rissbacher, Clemens & Pölzl, Alois & Tuttle-Weidinger, Linda & Reckwitz, Nanni, 2020. "Levers for integrating social work into primary healthcare networks in Austria," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 75-82.
    10. Hofmarcher, Maria M. & Festl, Eva & Bishop-Tarver, Leslie, 2016. "Health sector employment growth calls for improvements in labor productivity," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(8), pages 894-902.
    11. Schang, Laura & Thomson, Sarah & Czypionka, Thomas, 2016. "Explaining differences in stakeholder take up of disease management programmes: A comparative analysis of policy implementation in Austria and Germany," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(3), pages 281-292.
    12. Knai, Cécile & Brusamento, Serena & Legido-Quigley, Helena & Saliba, Vanessa & Panteli, Dimitra & Turk, Eva & Car, Josip & McKee, Martin & Busse, Reinhard, 2012. "Systematic review of the methodological quality of clinical guideline development for the management of chronic disease in Europe," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 157-167.
    13. He, Alex Jingwei & Tang, Vivien F.Y., 2021. "Integration of health services for the elderly in Asia: A scoping review of Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(3), pages 351-362.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:18:p:6608-:d:411950. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.