IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v366y2025ics0277953625000097.html

The genomic promise of cancer as “not-yet-treatable” and the moral burden of “trying”

Author

Listed:
  • Briz Hernández, Isabel

Abstract

Based on fieldwork conducted in China from November 2018 to January 2020 on biomedical innovation with advanced therapies open to foreigners, in this paper I address the question of why parents of children with incurable cancer decide to access experimental treatment on the other side of the world. While work on the “political economy of hope” has already extensively researched the relation between biomedical technology and hope, I delve into other terrains. In this paper, I will discuss the role of “ontological hope” in the moral project of caring for a child with cancer. Drawing on the Anthropology of Ethics, I conclude that in the postgenomic era, when incurable cancers are recategorize as not-yet-treatable, parents’ efforts to access experimental treatment highlight the complex moral work that parents must undergo to imagine a future good life despite their irreparable loss.

Suggested Citation

  • Briz Hernández, Isabel, 2025. "The genomic promise of cancer as “not-yet-treatable” and the moral burden of “trying”," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 366(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:366:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625000097
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117680
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625000097
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117680?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kerr, Anne & Hill, Rosemary L. & Till, Christopher, 2018. "The limits of responsible innovation: Exploring care, vulnerability and precision medicine," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 24-31.
    2. Haase, Rachel & Michie, Marsha & Skinner, Debra, 2015. "Flexible positions, managed hopes: The promissory bioeconomy of a whole genome sequencing cancer study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 146-153.
    3. Xielin Liu & Sylvia Schwaag Serger & Ulrike Tagscherer & Amber Y. Chang, 2017. "Beyond catch-up—can a new innovation policy help China overcome the middle income trap?," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 44(5), pages 656-669.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dutrénit, Gabriela & Natera, José Miguel & Puchet Anyul, Martín & Vera-Cruz, Alexandre O., 2019. "Development profiles and accumulation of technological capabilities in Latin America," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 396-412.
    2. Lehoux, P. & Miller, F.A. & Williams-Jones, B., 2020. "Anticipatory governance and moral imagination: Methodological insights from a scenario-based public deliberation study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    3. Ilan Vertinsky & Yingqiu Kuang & Dongsheng Zhou & Victor Cui, 2023. "The political economy and dynamics of bifurcated world governance and the decoupling of value chains: An alternative perspective," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(7), pages 1351-1377, September.
    4. Frietsch, Rainer, 2020. "Current R&I policy: The future development of China's R&I system," Discussion Papers "Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis" 63, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    5. Peerally, Jahan Ara & Santiago, Fernando & De Fuentes, Claudia & Moghavvemi, Sedigheh, 2022. "Towards a firm-level technological capability framework to endorse and actualize the Fourth Industrial Revolution in developing countries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(10).
    6. Simon Ndicu & Dianah Ngui & Laura Barasa, 2024. "Technological Catch-Up, Innovation, and Productivity Analysis of National Innovation Systems in Developing Countries in Africa 2010–2018," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 7941-7967, June.
    7. Borsi, Mihály Tamás & Valerio Mendoza, Octasiano Miguel & Comim, Flavio, 2022. "Measuring the provincial supply of higher education institutions in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    8. Chloé Mayeur & Heidi Mertes & Wannes Hoof, 2023. "Do genomic passports leave us more vulnerable or less vulnerable? Perspectives from an online citizen engagement," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    9. Arnt Fløysand & Emil Tomson Lindfors & Stig-Erik Jakobsen & Lars Coenen, 2020. "Place-Based Directionality of Innovation: Tasmanian Salmon Farming and Responsible Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    10. Antonio García-Sánchez & Ruth Rama, 2022. "Cooperative innovation and crises: Foreign subsidiaries, state-owned enterprises, and domestic private firms [Directorship Interlocks in Comparative Perspective: The Case of Spain]," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(6), pages 915-927.
    11. Buhmann, Alexander & Fieseler, Christian, 2021. "Towards a deliberative framework for responsible innovation in artificial intelligence," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    12. Garrard, Robert & Fielke, Simon, 2020. "Blockchain for trustworthy provenances: A case study in the Australian aquaculture industry," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    13. Dong, Jinjin & Shao, Meirong, 2025. "The impact of technology for social good (TSG) on the effectiveness of corporate ESG self-regulation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    14. Rikap, Cecilia, 2022. "Becoming an intellectual monopoly by relying on the national innovation system: the State Grid Corporation of China's experience," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(4).
    15. Song Wang & Jiexin Wang & Chenqi Wei & Xueli Wang & Fei Fan, 2021. "Collaborative innovation efficiency: From within cities to between cities—Empirical analysis based on innovative cities in China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 1330-1360, September.
    16. Lin, Jingyi & Plechero, Monica, 2019. "Global innovation networks for Chinese high tech small and medium enterprises: the supportive role of highly skilled migrants and returnees," Papers in Innovation Studies 2019/5, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    17. Suneel Kunamaneni, 2019. "CHALLENGES IN MOVING FROM INCREMENTAL TO RADICAL LOW-COST INNOVATION IN EMERGING AND TRANSITION COUNTRIES: Institutional Perspectives Based on Rechargeable Battery Innovation in China and Point-of-Use Water Purification Innovation in India," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(03), pages 1-36, April.
    18. Lundvall, Bengt-Åke & Rikap, Cecilia, 2022. "China's catching-up in artificial intelligence seen as a co-evolution of corporate and national innovation systems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1).
    19. Nijat Muradzada & Rafiga Ibrahimli, 2026. "How STI-centric myopia marginalises DUI Innovation in Azerbaijan," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 1-25, April.
    20. Yu Zhu & Feng Yang & Bengang Gong & Wei Zeng, 2023. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Assessing the efficiency of innovation entities in China: evidence from a nonhomogeneous data envelopment analysis and Tobit," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 175-205, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:366:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625000097. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.