IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v365y2025ics0277953624010414.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ambiguous animals, ambivalent carers and arbitrary care collectives: Re-theorizing resistance to social robots in healthcare

Author

Listed:
  • Ahlin, Tanja
  • Mann, Anna

Abstract

Many countries are under pressure because of lack of healthcare staff to provide care to an increasingly aged population. Potential solutions are often sought through technological innovation, including social robots to cater to the patients' emotional needs. Despite significant financial investments in social robots, they have not been implemented at a larger scale. One reason commonly cited for this is the resistance of healthcare staff. Drawing on an ethnographic case study of a social robot Paro in an Austrian hospital, we nuance resistance to robots through the heuristic of ambivalence. We argue that the ontological ambiguity of an animal-looking robot provokes highly ambivalent reactions among healthcare staff. Additionally, these reactions are shaped by how the social robot interferes with different professions and the forms of care that they provide. Finally, we show that non-significant others, such as fellow patients, can importantly impact the (dis)use of social robots, an influence which occurs through what we call ‘arbitrary care collectives.’

Suggested Citation

  • Ahlin, Tanja & Mann, Anna, 2025. "Ambiguous animals, ambivalent carers and arbitrary care collectives: Re-theorizing resistance to social robots in healthcare," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 365(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:365:y:2025:i:c:s0277953624010414
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117587
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624010414
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117587?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dympna Casey & Eva Barrett & Tanja Kovacic & Daniele Sancarlo & Francesco Ricciardi & Kathy Murphy & Adamantios Koumpis & Adam Santorelli & Niamh Gallagher & Sally Whelan, 2020. "The Perceptions of People with Dementia and Key Stakeholders Regarding the Use and Impact of the Social Robot MARIO," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Blake E. Ashforth & Kristie M. Rogers & Michael G. Pratt & Camille Pradies, 2014. "Ambivalence in Organizations: A Multilevel Approach," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1453-1478, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xue, Jinjie & Liu, Junqi & Geng, Zizhen & Yuan, Hongping & Chao, Lei, 2023. "Why and when do paradoxical management capabilities matter to paradoxical pressure? An empirical investigation of the role of coopetition," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    2. Robert Heckert, 2019. "Challenges for a Multiple Identity Organization: A Case Study of the Dutch Blood Supply Foundation," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(3), pages 101-119, August.
    3. Inga SHALEV & Adriana PRODAN, 2018. "Limiting Terms of Office for Directors as a Policy Change in the Israeli Nursing System," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(2), pages 109-123, May.
    4. Mishra, Nidhi & Bharti, Teena & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar & Pfajfar, Gregor, 2024. "Public and scholarly interest in social robots: An investigation through Google Trends, bibliometric analysis, and systematic literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    5. Khaksar, Seyed Mohammad Sadegh & Shahmehr, Fatemeh S. & Miah, Shah & Daim, Tugrul & Ozdemir, Dilek, 2024. "Privacy concerns versus personalisation benefits in social robot acceptance by employees: A paradox theory — Contingency perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    6. Lim, Jia Hui & Tai, Kenneth & Kouchaki, Maryam, 2021. "Ambivalent bosses: An examination of supervisor expressed emotional ambivalence on subordinate task engagement," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 139-152.
    7. Liu, Xin Lucy & Lu, Jackson G. & Zhang, Hongyu & Cai, Yahua, 2021. "Helping the organization but hurting yourself: How employees’ unethical pro-organizational behavior predicts work-to-life conflict," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 88-100.
    8. Alshareef, Leena & Dietlmeier, Simon Frederic & Florian, Urmetzer, 2024. "Coopetition For The Greater Good. Exploratory study of coopetition management mechanisms in the pharmaceutical industry," MPRA Paper 120645, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Tariku Ayana Abdi & José M. Peiró & Yarid Ayala & Salvatore Zappalà, 2018. "Four Wellbeing Patterns and their Antecedents in Millennials at Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, December.
    10. Reena Devi & Adam Gordon & Tom Dening, 2022. "Enhancing the Quality of Care in Long-Term Care Settings," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-3, January.
    11. Lenka, Sambit & Parida, Vinit & Sjödin, David Rönnberg & Wincent, Joakim, 2018. "Exploring the microfoundations of servitization: How individual actions overcome organizational resistance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 328-336.
    12. Simão, Gustavo Leonardo & Antonialli, Luiz Marcelo & Netto, Túlio Carvalho C. de Souza & Santos, Antonio Carlos dos, 2017. "Strategic Institutional Management in Dairy Cooperatives – a theoretical appointment," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 55(4), January.
    13. Lalaounis, Sotiris T. & Nayak, Ajit, 2022. "Dynamic stability: Unfolding dynamics of vicious cycles in a design firm," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 137-150.
    14. Junbang Lan & Yina Mao & Kelly Z. Peng & Yong Wang, 2022. "The combined effects of positive and negative affect on job satisfaction and counterproductive work behavior," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 1051-1069, September.
    15. Abraham Carmeli & Ari Dothan, 2024. "Engagement of family executive members in intrapreneurship in the family business," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 1062-1088, June.
    16. Lívia Markoczy & Sunny Li Sun & Jigao Zhu, 2020. "Few Women on Boards: What’s Identity Got to Do With It?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(2), pages 311-327, August.
    17. Carla Mouro & Vera Lomba & Ana Patrícia Duarte, 2021. "Pro-Environmental Behaviours at Work: The Interactive Role of Norms and Attitudinal Ambivalence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, October.
    18. Aurélie Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, 2017. "An Ethical Perspective on Emerging Forms of Ubiquitous IT-Based Control," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(1), pages 139-154, April.
    19. Marent, Benjamin & Henwood, Flis & Darking, Mary, 2018. "Ambivalence in digital health: Co-designing an mHealth platform for HIV care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 133-141.
    20. Lee, Jeoung Yul & Kim, Sunghoon & Noh, Shinwon & Jang, Seung Hoon & Lee, Sang Youn, 2024. "Paradoxical organizational culture, authoritarian leadership, and international firm performance: evidence from international firms in China," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(1).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:365:y:2025:i:c:s0277953624010414. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.