IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v194y2017icp96-104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determining geographic accessibility of family physician and nurse practitioner services in relation to the distribution of seniors within two Canadian Prairie Provinces

Author

Listed:
  • Shah, Tayyab Ikram
  • Milosavljevic, Stephan
  • Bath, Brenna

Abstract

Equitable access and distribution of health care services for rural and remote populations is a substantial challenge for health workforce planners and policy makers. Geospatial examination of access to health care considers both need and supply dimensions together to determine spatial access scores which contribute to a greater understanding of potential inequity in accessibility. This geospatial investigation explores geographic variation in accessibility to primary health care services utilizing combined access scores for family physicians and nurse practitioner services in urban and rural communities in the Canadian Prairie provinces of Saskatchewan and Alberta. An index of access scores was developed using a floating catchment area framework and a census subdivision geographic unit. Information about family physician and nurse practitioner practice locations and spatial population data were obtained from the Canadian Institute for Health Information and Statistics Canada respectively. Alberta has a better overall provincial access score than Saskatchewan for family physicians and nurse practitioners combined (11.37 vs. 9.77). The results demonstrate that nurse practitioner services are likely addressing primary care access gaps due to reduced numbers of family physician services in certain geographical areas. Combined access scores reveal inequalities in the distribution of primary health care services relative to the proportion of population aged 65 + across both provinces, particularly in rural and remote communities. This study contributes to health services research by exploration of combined access scores for family physician and nurse practitioner services in relation to the distribution of seniors. These findings provide insight into which areas may be in need of increased primary health care services with a focus on both of these health professional groups. The findings of this research will serve as a foundational model for future expansion of the methods to other health care provider groups and to other population health need indicators provincially and nationally.

Suggested Citation

  • Shah, Tayyab Ikram & Milosavljevic, Stephan & Bath, Brenna, 2017. "Determining geographic accessibility of family physician and nurse practitioner services in relation to the distribution of seniors within two Canadian Prairie Provinces," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 96-104.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:194:y:2017:i:c:p:96-104
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.10.019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953617306342
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.10.019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaltenthaler, Eva & Maheswaran, Ravi & Beverley, Catherine, 2004. "Population-based health indexes: a systematic review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 245-255, May.
    2. Nemet, Gregory F. & Bailey, Adrian J., 2000. "Distance and health care utilization among the rural elderly," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 50(9), pages 1197-1208, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ying Liu & Han Gu & Yuyu Shi, 2022. "Spatial Accessibility Analysis of Medical Facilities Based on Public Transportation Networks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Shaoyao Zhang & Xueqian Song & Yongping Wei & Wei Deng, 2019. "Spatial Equity of Multilevel Healthcare in the Metropolis of Chengdu, China: A New Assessment Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Jabrullah Ab Hamid & Muhamad Hanafiah Juni & Rosliza Abdul Manaf & Sharifah Norkhadijah Syed Ismail & Poh Ying Lim, 2023. "Spatial Accessibility of Primary Care in the Dual Public–Private Health System in Rural Areas, Malaysia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-21, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Woorim Kim & Kyu-Tae Han & Seungju Kim, 2021. "Do Patients Residing in Provincial Areas Transport and Spend More on Cancer Treatment in Korea?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-11, September.
    2. Mellow, Jeff & Schlager, Melinda D. & Caplan, Joel M., 2008. "Using GIS to evaluate post-release prisoner services in Newark, New Jersey," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 416-425, September.
    3. Ranković Plazinić, Biljana & Jović, Jadranka, 2018. "Mobility and transport potential of elderly in differently accessible rural areas," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 169-180.
    4. Panelli, Ruth & Gallagher, Lou & Kearns, Robin, 2006. "Access to rural health services: Research as community action and policy critique," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(5), pages 1103-1114, March.
    5. Cochran, Abigail L. & Wang, Jueyu & Prunkl, Lauren & Oluyede, Lindsay & Wolfe, Mary & McDonald, Noreen, 2021. "Examining Access to the COVID-19 Vaccine in Centralized and Dispersed Distribution Scenarios," SocArXiv e3sdu, Center for Open Science.
    6. Ryvicker, Miriam & Gallo, William T. & Fahs, Marianne C., 2012. "Environmental factors associated with primary care access among urban older adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(5), pages 914-921.
    7. Jing Luo & Guangping Chen & Chang Li & Bingyan Xia & Xuan Sun & Siyun Chen, 2018. "Use of an E2SFCA Method to Measure and Analyse Spatial Accessibility to Medical Services for Elderly People in Wuhan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, July.
    8. Mohan, Gretta & Nolan, Anne & Lyons, Seán, 2019. "An investigation of the effect of accessibility to General Practitioner services on healthcare utilisation among older people," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 254-263.
    9. Weinhold, Ines & Wende, Danny & Schrey, Christopher & Militzer-Horstmann, Carsta & Schang, Laura & Sundmacher, Leonie, 2022. "Assessing patients’ acceptable and realised distances to determine accessibility standards for the size of catchment areas in outpatient care," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(11), pages 1180-1186.
    10. Jehu-Appiah, Caroline & Aryeetey, Genevieve & Spaan, Ernst & de Hoop, Thomas & Agyepong, Irene & Baltussen, Rob, 2011. "Equity aspects of the National Health Insurance Scheme in Ghana: Who is enrolling, who is not and why?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 157-165, January.
    11. Cecilia S Lee & Grace L Su & Douglas M Baughman & Yue Wu & Aaron Y Lee, 2017. "Disparities in delivery of ophthalmic care; An exploration of public Medicare data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-12, August.
    12. Chris Herbst & Erdal Tekin, 2012. "Child Care Subsidies, Maternal Well-Being, and Child-Parent Interactions: Evidence from Three Nationally Representative Datasets," Working Papers 1372, Princeton University, School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Research on Child Wellbeing..
    13. Chen, Qiulin & Xu, Duo & Fu, Hongqiao & Yip, Winnie, 2022. "Distance effects and home bias in patient choice on the Internet: Evidence from an online healthcare platform in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    14. Herbst, Chris M. & Tekin, Erdal, 2012. "The geographic accessibility of child care subsidies and evidence on the impact of subsidy receipt on childhood obesity," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 37-52.
    15. Li, Ran & Tong, Daoqin, 2017. "Incorporating activity space and trip chaining into facility siting for accessibility maximization," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 1-14.
    16. Li, Ran & Tong, Daoqin, 2016. "Constructing human activity spaces: A new approach incorporating complex urban activity-travel," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 23-35.
    17. Herbst, Chris M. & Tekin, Erdal, 2010. "The Impact of Child Care Subsidies on Child Well-Being: Evidence from Geographic Variation in the Distance to Social Service Agencies," IZA Discussion Papers 5102, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    18. Hongyu Guan & Huan Wang & Juerong Huang & Kang Du & Jin Zhao & Matthew Boswell & Yaojiang Shi & Mony Iyer & Scott Rozelle, 2018. "Health Seeking Behavior among Rural Left-Behind Children: Evidence from Shaanxi and Gansu Provinces in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, April.
    19. Yamashita, Takashi & Kunkel, Suzanne R., 2010. "The association between heart disease mortality and geographic access to hospitals: County level comparisons in Ohio, USA," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(8), pages 1211-1218, April.
    20. repec:pri:crcwel:wp11-20-ff is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Weinhold, Ines & Gurtner, Sebastian, 2018. "Rural - urban differences in determinants of patient satisfaction with primary care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 76-85.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:194:y:2017:i:c:p:96-104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.