IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v86y2023ics0038012122002567.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robust building evacuation planning in a dynamic network flow model under collapsible nodes and arcs

Author

Listed:
  • Shin, Youngchul
  • Moon, Ilkyeong

Abstract

Rapid urbanization has caused various social problems. One typical example is the high population density of a building, particularly in a commercial building or a mega-mall. When an emergency, such as a natural or human-made disaster, occurs in a building with a high population, establishing a proper evacuation plan is required to minimize casualties. Accordingly, the evacuation planning problem, which determines optimal routes for evacuees from disaster-prone areas to safe areas, has been actively studied in various fields. However, research considering the possibility of further collapse of a specific area or intermediate route in the building has been overlooked. We propose a robust evacuation planning problem based on a dynamic network flow model that determines the optimal routes for evacuees from a building that has the potential to collapse. Computational results show that routes passing through areas with the potential to collapse may or may not be optimal for evacuees, depending on the given timeframe. If the timeframe is sufficient, detouring around the collapsible areas could be the optimal plan; however, if the timeframe is insufficient, passing through collapsible areas, with taking the risk, could be the optimal plan.

Suggested Citation

  • Shin, Youngchul & Moon, Ilkyeong, 2023. "Robust building evacuation planning in a dynamic network flow model under collapsible nodes and arcs," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:86:y:2023:i:c:s0038012122002567
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2022.101455
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012122002567
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101455?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dimitris Bertsimas & Melvyn Sim, 2004. "The Price of Robustness," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 35-53, February.
    2. Marc Goerigk & Ismaila Abderhamane Ndiaye, 2016. "Robust flows with losses and improvability in evacuation planning," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 4(3), pages 241-270, September.
    3. Aurell, Alexander & Djehiche, Boualem, 2019. "Modeling tagged pedestrian motion: A mean-field type game approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 168-183.
    4. L. G. Chalmet & R. L. Francis & P. B. Saunders, 1982. "Network Models for Building Evacuation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 86-105, January.
    5. Jorge A. Huertas & Daniel Duque & Ethel Segura-Durán & Raha Akhavan-Tabatabaei & Andrés L. Medaglia, 2020. "Evacuation dynamics: a modeling and visualization framework," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 42(3), pages 661-691, September.
    6. Najafi, Mehdi & Eshghi, Kourosh & Dullaert, Wout, 2013. "A multi-objective robust optimization model for logistics planning in the earthquake response phase," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 217-249.
    7. Choi, W. & Hamacher, H. W. & Tufekci, S., 1988. "Modeling of building evacuation problems by network flows with side constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 98-110, April.
    8. Dimitris Bertsimas & Ebrahim Nasrabadi & Sebastian Stiller, 2013. "Robust and Adaptive Network Flows," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1218-1242, October.
    9. Gorissen, Bram L. & Yanıkoğlu, İhsan & den Hertog, Dick, 2015. "A practical guide to robust optimization," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 124-137.
    10. Galindo, Gina & Batta, Rajan, 2013. "Review of recent developments in OR/MS research in disaster operations management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(2), pages 201-211.
    11. A. Ben-Tal & A. Nemirovski, 1998. "Robust Convex Optimization," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 769-805, November.
    12. Ismaila Abderhamane Ndiaye & Emmanuel Neron & Antoine Jouglet, 2017. "Macroscopic evacuation plans for natural disasters," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 39(1), pages 231-272, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roberto Gomes de Mattos & Fabricio Oliveira & Adriana Leiras & Abdon Baptista de Paula Filho & Paulo Gonçalves, 2019. "Robust optimization of the insecticide-treated bed nets procurement and distribution planning under uncertainty for malaria prevention and control," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1045-1078, December.
    2. Ghazaleh Ahmadi & Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam & Armand Baboli & Mehdi Najafi, 2022. "A decision support model for robust allocation and routing of search and rescue resources after earthquake: a case study," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 1039-1081, April.
    3. Wang, Xinfang (Jocelyn) & Paul, Jomon A., 2020. "Robust optimization for hurricane preparedness," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    4. Lu, Chung-Cheng & Ying, Kuo-Ching & Chen, Hui-Ju, 2016. "Real-time relief distribution in the aftermath of disasters – A rolling horizon approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 1-20.
    5. Antonio G. Martín & Manuel Díaz-Madroñero & Josefa Mula, 2020. "Master production schedule using robust optimization approaches in an automobile second-tier supplier," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(1), pages 143-166, March.
    6. Shunichi Ohmori, 2021. "A Predictive Prescription Using Minimum Volume k -Nearest Neighbor Enclosing Ellipsoid and Robust Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-16, January.
    7. Wang, Tian & Deng, Shiming, 2019. "Multi-Period energy procurement policies for smart-grid communities with deferrable demand and supplementary uncertain power supplies," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 212-226.
    8. Jiang, Sheng-Long & Peng, Gongzhuang & Bogle, I. David L. & Zheng, Zhong, 2022. "Two-stage robust optimization approach for flexible oxygen distribution under uncertainty in integrated iron and steel plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PB).
    9. Viktoryia Buhayenko & Dick den Hertog, 2017. "Adjustable Robust Optimisation approach to optimise discounts for multi-period supply chain coordination under demand uncertainty," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(22), pages 6801-6823, November.
    10. Paul, Jomon A. & Zhang, Minjiao, 2019. "Supply location and transportation planning for hurricanes: A two-stage stochastic programming framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(1), pages 108-125.
    11. Jorge A. Huertas & Daniel Duque & Ethel Segura-Durán & Raha Akhavan-Tabatabaei & Andrés L. Medaglia, 2020. "Evacuation dynamics: a modeling and visualization framework," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 42(3), pages 661-691, September.
    12. Cleber D. Rocco & Reinaldo Morabito, 2016. "Robust optimisation approach applied to the analysis of production / logistics and crop planning in the tomato processing industry," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(19), pages 5842-5861, October.
    13. Guo, Xiaotong & Caros, Nicholas S. & Zhao, Jinhua, 2021. "Robust matching-integrated vehicle rebalancing in ride-hailing system with uncertain demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 161-189.
    14. Carvalho, Andréa Nunes & Oliveira, Fabricio & Scavarda, Luiz Felipe, 2016. "Tactical capacity planning in a real-world ETO industry case: A robust optimization approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 158-171.
    15. Yanyan Wang & Baiqing Sun, 2022. "Multiperiod optimal emergency material allocation considering road network damage and risk under uncertain conditions," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 2173-2208, July.
    16. Shin, Youngchul & Lee, Sangyoon & Moon, Ilkyeong, 2021. "Robust multiperiod inventory model with a new type of buy one get one promotion: “My Own Refrigerator”," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    17. Bakker, Hannah & Dunke, Fabian & Nickel, Stefan, 2020. "A structuring review on multi-stage optimization under uncertainty: Aligning concepts from theory and practice," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    18. Marc Goerigk & Ismaila Abderhamane Ndiaye, 2016. "Robust flows with losses and improvability in evacuation planning," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 4(3), pages 241-270, September.
    19. Balcik, Burcu & Yanıkoğlu, İhsan, 2020. "A robust optimization approach for humanitarian needs assessment planning under travel time uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(1), pages 40-57.
    20. Tereza Sedlářová Nehézová & Michal Škoda & Robert Hlavatý & Helena Brožová, 2022. "Fuzzy and robust approach for decision-making in disaster situations," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 30(2), pages 617-645, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:86:y:2023:i:c:s0038012122002567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.