IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v79y2022ics003801212100118x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multi-objective model for optimizing the socio-economic performance of a pharmaceutical supply chain

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmad, Firoz
  • Alnowibet, Khalid A.
  • Alrasheedi, Adel F.
  • Adhami, Ahmad Yusuf

Abstract

Potential production policies and distribution strategies for pharmaceutical products have attracted significant attention to sustainable development. End-of-life products have a severe impact on the ecological system. Thus, this paper has developed sustainable objectives in the pharmaceutical supply chain optimization framework with different constraints under uncertainty. The trade-off between socio-economic and environmental objectives is identified by ensuring the optimal allocation of different products among various echelons. Furthermore, three different solution approaches have suggested solving the proposed model. The Techniques for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) ranking method is used to rank the different solution sets. Apart from TOPSIS, multiple criteria such as baseline design, co-efficient of variance, and degree of desirability have been depicted to select the best compromise solution set. Finally, an industrial case study of a pharmaceutical company is presented to validate and demonstrate the modeling and optimization approach. The outcomes facilitate wholesome decision-making policies with the achievement of sustainable objectives and provide opportunities to further align business practices with social needs and expectations, which then promote long-term market value—recognizing the need for inter-dependence and cooperation results in a reduction in total economic costs and improvements in customers’ services, and less impact on the environment. Furthermore, by increasing customer coverage distance, the firm earns customer loyalty, which results in repurchasing behaviors. Similarly, customer satisfaction is a vital social factor concerning the TBL objectives and significantly impacts sustainable PSC planning. The in-depth managerial insights are also addressed based on the presented work. After reviewing the literature, this is the first attempt to analyze the socio-economic performance of the pharmaceutical supply chain considering uncertain parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmad, Firoz & Alnowibet, Khalid A. & Alrasheedi, Adel F. & Adhami, Ahmad Yusuf, 2022. "A multi-objective model for optimizing the socio-economic performance of a pharmaceutical supply chain," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:79:y:2022:i:c:s003801212100118x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2021.101126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003801212100118X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2021.101126?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Salem Nechi & Belaid Aouni & Zouhair Mrabet, 2020. "Managing sustainable development through goal programming model and satisfaction functions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 293(2), pages 747-766, October.
    2. Frota Neto, J. Quariguasi & Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J.M. & van Nunen, J.A.E.E. & van Heck, E., 2008. "Designing and evaluating sustainable logistics networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 195-208, February.
    3. Chen, Chen-Tung & Lin, Ching-Torng & Huang, Sue-Fn, 2006. "A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 289-301, August.
    4. Firoz Ahmad & Ahmad Yusuf Adhami, 2019. "Total cost measures with probabilistic cost function under varying supply and demand in transportation problem," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(2), pages 583-602, June.
    5. Hassini, Elkafi & Surti, Chirag & Searcy, Cory, 2012. "A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 69-82.
    6. Jimenez, Mariano & Arenas, Mar & Bilbao, Amelia & Rodri'guez, M. Victoria, 2007. "Linear programming with fuzzy parameters: An interactive method resolution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1599-1609, March.
    7. Chiu, Chui-Te & Hsu, Tseng-Hsing & Yang, Wan-Fa, 2008. "Life cycle assessment on using recycled materials for rehabilitating asphalt pavements," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 545-556.
    8. Lai, Young-Jou & Liu, Ting-Yun & Hwang, Ching-Lai, 1994. "TOPSIS for MODM," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(3), pages 486-500, August.
    9. Sujeet Kumar Singh & Mark Goh, 2019. "Multi-objective mixed integer programming and an application in a pharmaceutical supply chain," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(4), pages 1214-1237, February.
    10. Abbas Ahmadi & Mohammad Mousazadeh & S. Ali Torabi & Mir Saman Pishvaee, 2018. "OR Applications in Pharmaceutical Supply Chain Management," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Cengiz Kahraman & Y. Ilker Topcu (ed.), Operations Research Applications in Health Care Management, chapter 0, pages 461-491, Springer.
    11. Brandenburg, Marcus & Govindan, Kannan & Sarkis, Joseph & Seuring, Stefan, 2014. "Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: Developments and directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(2), pages 299-312.
    12. Chung, Sung Hoon & Kwon, Changhyun, 2016. "Integrated supply chain management for perishable products: Dynamics and oligopolistic competition perspectives with application to pharmaceuticals," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 117-129.
    13. Pishvaee, M.S. & Razmi, J. & Torabi, S.A., 2014. "An accelerated Benders decomposition algorithm for sustainable supply chain network design under uncertainty: A case study of medical needle and syringe supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 14-38.
    14. Mota, Bruna & Gomes, Maria Isabel & Carvalho, Ana & Barbosa-Povoa, Ana Paula, 2018. "Sustainable supply chains: An integrated modeling approach under uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 32-57.
    15. Juan Villegas & Fernando Palacios & Andrés Medaglia, 2006. "Solution methods for the bi-objective (cost-coverage) unconstrained facility location problem with an illustrative example," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 109-141, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carmona-Benítez, Rafael Bernardo & Cruz, Héctor, 2023. "A multiproduct gasoline supply chain with product standardization and postponement strategy," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Firoz Ahmad, 2022. "Interactive neutrosophic optimization technique for multiobjective programming problems: an application to pharmaceutical supply chain management," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(2), pages 551-585, April.
    2. Fahimnia, Behnam & Jabbarzadeh, Armin, 2016. "Marrying supply chain sustainability and resilience: A match made in heaven," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 306-324.
    3. Jyoti Dhingra Darbari & Devika Kannan & Vernika Agarwal & P. C. Jha, 2019. "Fuzzy criteria programming approach for optimising the TBL performance of closed loop supply chain network design problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 273(1), pages 693-738, February.
    4. Zhalechian, M. & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. & Zahiri, B. & Mohammadi, M., 2016. "Sustainable design of a closed-loop location-routing-inventory supply chain network under mixed uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 182-214.
    5. Tuni, Andrea & Rentizelas, Athanasios, 2019. "An innovative eco-intensity based method for assessing extended supply chain environmental sustainability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 126-142.
    6. Ozden Tozanli & Gazi Murat Duman & Elif Kongar & Surendra M. Gupta, 2017. "Environmentally Concerned Logistics Operations in Fuzzy Environment: A Literature Survey," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-42, June.
    7. Shoufeng Ji & Pengyun Zhao & Tingting Ji, 2023. "A Hybrid Optimization Method for Sustainable and Flexible Design of Supply–Production–Distribution Network in the Physical Internet," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-34, April.
    8. Aleksander Banasik & Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard & Argyris Kanellopoulos & G. D. H. Claassen & Jack G. A. J. Vorst, 2018. "Multi-criteria decision making approaches for green supply chains: a review," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 366-396, September.
    9. Sara Al-Haidous & Tareq Al-Ansari, 2019. "Sustainable Liquefied Natural Gas Supply Chain Management: A Review of Quantitative Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.
    10. Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana Paula & da Silva, Cátia & Carvalho, Ana, 2018. "Opportunities and challenges in sustainable supply chain: An operations research perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(2), pages 399-431.
    11. Somayeh Soheilirad & Kannan Govindan & Abbas Mardani & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Mehrbakhsh Nilashi & Norhayati Zakuan, 2018. "Application of data envelopment analysis models in supply chain management: a systematic review and meta-analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 915-969, December.
    12. Banasik, Aleksander & Kanellopoulos, Argyris & Claassen, G.D.H. & Bloemhof-Ruwaard, Jacqueline M. & van der Vorst, Jack G.A.J., 2017. "Closing loops in agricultural supply chains using multi-objective optimization: A case study of an industrial mushroom supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 409-420.
    13. Mallidis, Ioannis & Vlachos, Dimitrios & Iakovou, Eleftherios & Dekker, Rommert, 2014. "Design and planning for green global supply chains under periodic review replenishment policies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 210-235.
    14. Maiyar, Lohithaksha M. & Thakkar, Jitesh J., 2019. "Modelling and analysis of intermodal food grain transportation under hub disruption towards sustainability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 281-297.
    15. Rohmer, S.U.K. & Gerdessen, J.C. & Claassen, G.D.H., 2019. "Sustainable supply chain design in the food system with dietary considerations: A multi-objective analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 1149-1164.
    16. Mastrocinque, Ernesto & Ramírez, F. Javier & Honrubia-Escribano, Andrés & Pham, Duc T., 2022. "Industry 4.0 enabling sustainable supply chain development in the renewable energy sector: A multi-criteria intelligent approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    17. Nihan Kabadayı, 2020. "An Integrated Fuzzy DEMATEL and Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS Method to Evaluate Sustainable Suppliers," Alphanumeric Journal, Bahadir Fatih Yildirim, vol. 8(2), pages 201-226, December.
    18. Andrzej Lis & Agata Sudolska & Mateusz Tomanek, 2020. "Mapping Research on Sustainable Supply-Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-26, May.
    19. Martins, C.L. & Melo, M.T. & Pato, M.V., 2019. "Redesigning a food bank supply chain network in a triple bottom line context," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 234-247.
    20. Luthra, Sunil & Garg, Dixit & Haleem, Abid, 2015. "An analysis of interactions among critical success factors to implement green supply chain management towards sustainability: An Indian perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(P1), pages 37-50.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:79:y:2022:i:c:s003801212100118x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.