IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/retrec/v93y2022ics0739885921001463.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enablers of resilience in the healthcare supply chain: A case study of U.S healthcare industry during COVID-19 pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Zamiela, Christian
  • Hossain, Niamat Ullah Ibne
  • Jaradat, Raed

Abstract

Healthcare is considered one basic necessity to sustaining life; thereby, assessing the character of a healthy and resilient supply chain can help a nation develop ideas to combat the healthcare crisis. COVID-19 has led to a long-term strain on the healthcare supply chain (HCSC) and has resulted in a lack of basic healthcare necessities. It has become apparent that supply chain disruptions and increased usage has led to a lack of medical supplies needed to provide the proper care to patients. Multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) will help to indicate what characteristics contribute to resilient healthcare supply chains. To assess the characteristic of a resilient supply chain, significant healthcare supply chains will help indicate significant characteristics. A case study on the medical supplies’ supply chains is presented. A rank reversal proximity index MCDM method ranks criteria to assist with decision making. The proximity index will reduce the chances of the rank reversal phenomenon that results in incorrect rankings from occurring. Results show that redundancy, collaboration, and robustness are key indicators of a resilient supply chain while, supply chain design, communication capabilities, and supply chain risk management become comparatively less important during the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, an unsupervised machine learning tecnique named "cluster analysis" is conducted to group the resilience indicators of the respective supply chain. Through this study, the best way to combat disruptions in the healthcare supply chain due to large-scale pandemics is to share information quickly, reduce reliance on the design of the supply chain, and track the usage of necessary medical supplies. Alternatively, we validated our study by comparing a Preference Selection Index (PSI) to the proposed method.

Suggested Citation

  • Zamiela, Christian & Hossain, Niamat Ullah Ibne & Jaradat, Raed, 2022. "Enablers of resilience in the healthcare supply chain: A case study of U.S healthcare industry during COVID-19 pandemic," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:93:y:2022:i:c:s0739885921001463
    DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2021.101174
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885921001463
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.retrec.2021.101174?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Midhun Paul & R. Sridharan & T. Radha Ramanan, 2016. "A multi-objective decision-making framework using preference selection index for assembly job shop scheduling problem," International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(4), pages 362-387.
    2. Sakib, Nazmus & Ibne Hossain, Niamat Ullah & Nur, Farjana & Talluri, Srinivas & Jaradat, Raed & Lawrence, Jeanne Marie, 2021. "An assessment of probabilistic disaster in the oil and gas supply chain leveraging Bayesian belief network," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    3. Philip Berke & Ratana Chuenpagdee & Kungwan Juntarashote & Stephanie Chang, 2008. "Human-ecological dimensions of disaster resiliency in Thailand: social capital and aid delivery," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(2), pages 303-317.
    4. Kamalahmadi, Masoud & Parast, Mahour Mellat, 2016. "A review of the literature on the principles of enterprise and supply chain resilience: Major findings and directions for future research," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P1), pages 116-133.
    5. Markus Jochmann & Roberto León‐González, 2004. "Estimating the demand for health care with panel data: a semiparametric Bayesian approach," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(10), pages 1003-1014, October.
    6. Gang Kou & Wenshuai Wu, 2014. "Multi-criteria decision analysis for emergency medical service assessment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 223(1), pages 239-254, December.
    7. Liberatore, Matthew J. & Nydick, Robert L., 2008. "The analytic hierarchy process in medical and health care decision making: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(1), pages 194-207, August.
    8. Thomas Hanne & Teresa Melo & Stefan Nickel, 2009. "Bringing Robustness to Patient Flow Management Through Optimized Patient Transports in Hospitals," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 39(3), pages 241-255, June.
    9. Saedi, Samira & Kundakcioglu, O. Erhun & Henry, Andrea C., 2016. "Mitigating the impact of drug shortages for a healthcare facility: An inventory management approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(1), pages 107-123.
    10. Vipul Jain & Sameer Kumar & Umang Soni & Charu Chandra, 2017. "Supply chain resilience: model development and empirical analysis," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(22), pages 6779-6800, November.
    11. Ivanov, Dmitry, 2020. "Predicting the impacts of epidemic outbreaks on global supply chains: A simulation-based analysis on the coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2) case," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    12. Kalai Anand Ratnam & P.D.D. Dominic, 2016. "Factors associating the IT capability in healthcare services and its perceived transformation impact," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 22(1), pages 82-99.
    13. Chithambaranathan, P. & Subramanian, Nachiappan & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Palaniappan, PL.K., 2015. "Service supply chain environmental performance evaluation using grey based hybrid MCDM approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 163-176.
    14. Hashemi, Seyed Hamid & Karimi, Amir & Tavana, Madjid, 2015. "An integrated green supplier selection approach with analytic network process and improved Grey relational analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 178-191.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antonio Zavala-Alcívar & María-José Verdecho & Juan-José Alfaro-Saiz, 2020. "A Conceptual Framework to Manage Resilience and Increase Sustainability in the Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-38, August.
    2. Maria Ghufran & Khurram Iqbal Ahmad Khan & Fahim Ullah & Wesam Salah Alaloul & Muhammad Ali Musarat, 2022. "Key Enablers of Resilient and Sustainable Construction Supply Chains: A Systems Thinking Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Clavijo-Buritica, Nicolás & Triana-Sanchez, Laura & Escobar, John Willmer, 2023. "A hybrid modeling approach for resilient agri-supply network design in emerging countries: Colombian coffee supply chain," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    4. Peyman Akhavan & Maryam Philsoophian, 2023. "Improving of Supply Chain Collaboration and Performance by Using Block Chain Technology as a Mediating Role and Resilience as a Moderating Variable," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(4), pages 4561-4582, December.
    5. El-Awady Attia & Ali Alarjani & Md. Sharif Uddin & Ahmed Farouk Kineber, 2023. "Determining the Stationary Enablers of Resilient and Sustainable Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, February.
    6. Thalles Vitelli Garcez & Helder Tenório Cavalcanti & Adiel Teixeira de Almeida, 2021. "A hybrid decision support model using Grey Relational Analysis and the Additive-Veto Model for solving multicriteria decision-making problems: an approach to supplier selection," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 304(1), pages 199-231, September.
    7. Lei Ji & Chunlin Yuan & Taiwen Feng & Chen Wang, 2020. "Achieving the environmental profits of green supplier integration: The roles of supply chain resilience and knowledge combination," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4), pages 978-989, July.
    8. Chih-Hung Hsu & An-Yuan Chang & Ting-Yi Zhang & Wei-Da Lin & Wan-Ling Liu, 2021. "Deploying Resilience Enablers to Mitigate Risks in Sustainable Fashion Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-24, March.
    9. Shashi & Piera Centobelli & Roberto Cerchione & Myriam Ertz, 2020. "Managing supply chain resilience to pursue business and environmental strategies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1215-1246, March.
    10. Ananna Paul & Nagesh Shukla & Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Andrea Trianni, 2021. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-28, June.
    11. Aleksander Banasik & Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard & Argyris Kanellopoulos & G. D. H. Claassen & Jack G. A. J. Vorst, 2018. "Multi-criteria decision making approaches for green supply chains: a review," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 366-396, September.
    12. Chih-Hung Hsu & Ming-Ge Li & Ting-Yi Zhang & An-Yuan Chang & Shu-Zhen Shangguan & Wan-Ling Liu, 2022. "Deploying Big Data Enablers to Strengthen Supply Chain Resilience to Mitigate Sustainable Risks Based on Integrated HOQ-MCDM Framework," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-35, April.
    13. Naghshineh, Bardia & Carvalho, Helena, 2022. "The implications of additive manufacturing technology adoption for supply chain resilience: A systematic search and review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    14. Chen, Li-Ming & Chang, Wei-Lun, 2021. "Supply- and cyber-related disruptions in cloud supply chain firms: Determining the best recovery speeds," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    15. Morteza Yazdani & Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, 2016. "New integration of MCDM methods and QFD in the selection of green suppliers," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(6), pages 1097-1113, November.
    16. Mohammed, Ahmed & Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz & Koh, Lenny & Hubbard, Nicolas & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose & Al Ahmed, Teejan, 2022. "The sourcing decision-making process in the era of digitalization: A new quantitative methodology," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    17. Sardesai, Saskia & Klingebiel, Katja, 2023. "Maintaining viability by rapid supply chain adaptation using a process capability index," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    18. P. Siva Kumar & Ramesh Anbanandam, 2020. "Theory Building on Supply Chain Resilience: A SAP–LAP Analysis," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 21(2), pages 113-133, June.
    19. Pinyarat Sirisomboonsuk & James Burns, 2023. "Sustainability in Supply Chains through Rapid Capacity Increases and Minimized Disruptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, March.
    20. Marta Negri & Enrico Cagno & Claudia Colicchia & Joseph Sarkis, 2021. "Integrating sustainability and resilience in the supply chain: A systematic literature review and a research agenda," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 2858-2886, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:93:y:2022:i:c:s0739885921001463. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/620614/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.