IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v93y2018icp499-506.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Classification of geothermal resources in Indonesia by applying exergy concept

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammadzadeh Bina, Saeid
  • Jalilinasrabady, Saeid
  • Fujii, Hikari
  • Pambudi, Nugroho Agung

Abstract

Indonesia is well-known for its reputation for possessing the world's largest geothermal potential, which has been characterized by high temperature geothermal resources' concentration. The geothermal energy potential of Indonesia has been estimated to be 28,617 MW, which is about 40% of the world's geothermal potential. However, only about 4.5% is being utilized as electrical energy supply in this country. This paper comprises the Indonesian geothermal resources, based on their capability of doing work and efficiency. In this study, currently operating geothermal power plants in Indonesia have been classified, based on the exergy concept and the Specific Exergy Index (SExI). The results of SExI values show that nine geothermal fields are classified as high exergy resource with their SExI values exceeding 0.5, and two remaining power plants with SExI values between 0.05 and 0.5 are classified as medium geothermal resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammadzadeh Bina, Saeid & Jalilinasrabady, Saeid & Fujii, Hikari & Pambudi, Nugroho Agung, 2018. "Classification of geothermal resources in Indonesia by applying exergy concept," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 499-506.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:93:y:2018:i:c:p:499-506
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032118303630
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohammadzadeh Bina, Saeid & Jalilinasrabady, Saeid & Fujii, Hikari, 2017. "Energy, economic and environmental (3E) aspects of internal heat exchanger for ORC geothermal power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 1096-1106.
    2. Rivera Diaz, Alexandre & Kaya, Eylem & Zarrouk, Sadiq J., 2016. "Reinjection in geothermal fields − A worldwide review update," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 105-162.
    3. Unverdi, Murat & Cerci, Yunus, 2013. "Performance analysis of Germencik Geothermal Power Plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 192-200.
    4. Etemoglu, A.B. & Can, M., 2007. "Classification of geothermal resources in Turkey by exergy analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 11(7), pages 1596-1606, September.
    5. Kaya, Eylem & Zarrouk, Sadiq J. & O'Sullivan, Michael J., 2011. "Reinjection in geothermal fields: A review of worldwide experience," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 47-68, January.
    6. Shafiee, Shahriar & Topal, Erkan, 2009. "When will fossil fuel reserves be diminished?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 181-189, January.
    7. Pambudi, Nugroho Agung & Itoi, Ryuichi & Jalilinasrabady, Saeid & Jaelani, Khasani, 2015. "Performance improvement of a single-flash geothermal power plant in Dieng, Indonesia, upon conversion to a double-flash system using thermodynamic analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 424-431.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anderson, Austin & Rezaie, Behnaz, 2019. "Geothermal technology: Trends and potential role in a sustainable future," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C), pages 18-34.
    2. Li, Tailu & Qin, Haosen & Wang, Jianqiang & Gao, Xiang & Meng, Nan & Jia, Yanan & Liu, Qinghua, 2021. "Energetic and exergetic performance of a novel polygeneration energy system driven by geothermal energy and solar energy for power, hydrogen and domestic hot water," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 318-336.
    3. Fan, Huifang & Zhang, Luyi & Wang, Ruifei & Song, Hongqing & Xie, Hui & Du, Li & Sun, Pengguang, 2020. "Investigation on geothermal water reservoir development and utilization with variable temperature regulation: A case study of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    4. Rahman, Arief & Dargusch, Paul & Wadley, David, 2021. "The political economy of oil supply in Indonesia and the implications for renewable energy development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    5. Honglin Xu & Nian Peng & Tianshou Ma & Bin Yang, 2018. "Investigation of Thermal Stress of Cement Sheath for Geothermal Wells during Fracturing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, September.
    6. Hon Chung Lau & Seeram Ramakrishna & Kai Zhang & Mohamed Ziaudeen Shahul Hameed, 2021. "A Decarbonization Roadmap for Singapore and Its Energy Policy Implications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-23, October.
    7. Vivek Aggarwal & Chandan Swaroop Meena & Ashok Kumar & Tabish Alam & Anuj Kumar & Arijit Ghosh & Aritra Ghosh, 2020. "Potential and Future Prospects of Geothermal Energy in Space Conditioning of Buildings: India and Worldwide Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-19, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Inkyu & Tester, Jefferson William & You, Fengqi, 2019. "Systems analysis, design, and optimization of geothermal energy systems for power production and polygeneration: State-of-the-art and future challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 551-577.
    2. Melikoglu, Mehmet, 2017. "Geothermal energy in Turkey and around the World: A review of the literature and an analysis based on Turkey's Vision 2023 energy targets," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 485-492.
    3. Mahmoodpour, Saeed & Singh, Mrityunjay & Turan, Aysegul & Bär, Kristian & Sass, Ingo, 2022. "Simulations and global sensitivity analysis of the thermo-hydraulic-mechanical processes in a fractured geothermal reservoir," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    4. Colmenar-Santos, Antonio & Folch-Calvo, Martin & Rosales-Asensio, Enrique & Borge-Diez, David, 2016. "The geothermal potential in Spain," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 865-886.
    5. Vaccari, Marco & Pannocchia, Gabriele & Tognotti, Leonardo & Paci, Marco & Bonciani, Roberto, 2020. "A rigorous simulation model of geothermal power plants for emission control," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    6. Paoletti, V. & Langella, G. & Di Napoli, R. & Amoresano, A. & Meo, S. & Pecoraino, G. & Aiuppa, A., 2015. "A tool for evaluating geothermal power exploitability and its application to Ischia, Southern Italy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 303-312.
    7. Kaya, Eylem & Callos, Victor & Mannington, Warren, 2018. "CO2 –water mixture reinjection into two-phase liquid dominated geothermal reservoirs," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 652-667.
    8. Ciriaco, Anthony E. & Zarrouk, Sadiq J. & Zakeri, Golbon, 2020. "Geothermal resource and reserve assessment methodology: Overview, analysis and future directions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    9. Chen, Chaofan & Witte, Francesco & Tuschy, Ilja & Kolditz, Olaf & Shao, Haibing, 2022. "Parametric optimization and comparative study of an organic Rankine cycle power plant for two-phase geothermal sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    10. Alvin Kiprono Bett & Saeid Jalilinasrabady, 2021. "Optimization of ORC Power Plants for Geothermal Application in Kenya by Combining Exergy and Pinch Point Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    11. Aye, Goodness & Gupta, Rangan & Hammoudeh, Shawkat & Kim, Won Joong, 2015. "Forecasting the price of gold using dynamic model averaging," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 257-266.
    12. Ali Mubarak Al-Qahtani, 2023. "A Comprehensive Review in Microwave Pyrolysis of Biomass, Syngas Production and Utilisation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-16, September.
    13. Jen-Yu Lee & Tien-Thinh Nguyen & Hong-Giang Nguyen & Jen-Yao Lee, 2022. "Towards Predictive Crude Oil Purchase: A Case Study in the USA and Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, May.
    14. Steve Newbold & Charles Griffiths & Christopher C. Moore & Ann Wolverton & Elizabeth Kopits, 2010. "The "Social Cost of Carbon" Made Simple," NCEE Working Paper Series 201007, National Center for Environmental Economics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, revised Aug 2010.
    15. Ritter, Hendrik & Zimmermann, Karl, 2019. "Cap-and-Trade Policy vs. Carbon Taxation: Of Leakage and Linkage," EconStor Preprints 197796, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    16. Yassir El Karkri & Alexis B. Rey-Boué & Hassan El Moussaoui & Johannes Stöckl & Thomas I. Strasser, 2019. "Improved Control of Grid-connected DFIG-based Wind Turbine using Proportional-Resonant Regulators during Unbalanced Grid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, October.
    17. Jānis Krūmiņš & Māris Kļaviņš, 2023. "Investigating the Potential of Nuclear Energy in Achieving a Carbon-Free Energy Future," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-31, April.
    18. Wang, Yifei & Leung, Dennis Y.C. & Xuan, Jin & Wang, Huizhi, 2016. "A review on unitized regenerative fuel cell technologies, part-A: Unitized regenerative proton exchange membrane fuel cells," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 961-977.
    19. Bodisco, Timothy & Brown, Richard J., 2013. "Inter-cycle variability of in-cylinder pressure parameters in an ethanol fumigated common rail diesel engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 55-65.
    20. Foster, John & Bell, William Paul & Wild, Phillip & Sharma, Deepak & Sandu, Suwin & Froome, Craig & Wagner, Liam & Misra, Suchi & Bagia, Ravindra, 2013. "Analysis of institutional adaptability to redress electricity infrastructure vulnerability due to climate change," MPRA Paper 47787, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:93:y:2018:i:c:p:499-506. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.